30.11.2012 Views

(Eh) y metanólico (Em) de Pera distichophylla sobre un aislado de ...

(Eh) y metanólico (Em) de Pera distichophylla sobre un aislado de ...

(Eh) y metanólico (Em) de Pera distichophylla sobre un aislado de ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A. da S. BARBOSA et al.<br />

animals as the parameter of choice, totaling 16 soil<br />

samples collected for each collection point.<br />

The water from surface sources (raw water)<br />

was collected by means of the discharge of 2000<br />

liters in commercial Aqualimp® filters, having<br />

blanket cartridges and coiled wire with 1 µm<br />

porosity of C<strong>un</strong>o® DPPPY-1 Micro Wind II mo<strong>de</strong>l.<br />

After filtration, the cartridges were packaged in<br />

properly marked plastic bags. Aro<strong>un</strong>d two liters of<br />

reservoir-bottom sediments were collected from<br />

two polyethylene reservoirs (treated water) with<br />

the aid of a 1’ plastic hose through siphoning.<br />

This sediment was stored in 2 liter plastic bottles,<br />

previously cleaned and i<strong>de</strong>ntified.<br />

In the soil, the collections were standardized<br />

in pool system, which represents the points<br />

surro<strong>un</strong>ding each place previously <strong>de</strong>termined as<br />

reference. Each collection point is 150 cm distant<br />

from the reference, and the collection points are<br />

250 cm equidistant from each other. All the soil<br />

collected from the chosen point was stored in the<br />

same plastic bag, forming one sample. The material<br />

collected was obtained by surface scraping of the<br />

soil with a stainless steel paddle insi<strong>de</strong> a square<br />

of 25 cm 2 , and a template was used. After the<br />

collection, soil samples were packaged in properly<br />

marked plastic bags.<br />

The water and soil samples were stored in refrigerated<br />

isothermal container and sent to the Parasitology<br />

Laboratory of the Biomedical Institute, at<br />

Fe<strong>de</strong>ral Fluminense University (UFF) and then sent<br />

to the Imm<strong>un</strong>odiagnostic Laboratory of the Department<br />

of Biological Sciences (DCB), at the National<br />

School of Public Health (ENSP)/FIOCRUZ.<br />

Preprocessing:The filter cartridges were eluted<br />

by washing with one liter of neutral <strong>de</strong>tergent solution<br />

at 0.001% (q.s.p.), gauze filtered and placed for<br />

sedimentation. The samples stored in 2-liter plastic<br />

bottles were filtered and placed for sedimentation.<br />

In the soil, 100 g of each sample were used by <strong>de</strong>posit<br />

in conical bottom cups with 1-liter <strong>de</strong>tergent<br />

solution at 0.001% (q.s.p.), and the material was<br />

homogenized and filtered with a gauze and placed<br />

for sedimentation.<br />

Surveys of protozoa cysts and helminth eggs<br />

using microscopic techniques: The sediment was<br />

aliquoted and all samples were subject to survey<br />

of evolutionary forms of protozoa and helminths.<br />

One mililiter of the sediment was used for each<br />

microscopic concentration technique. Three glass<br />

92<br />

sli<strong>de</strong>s per sample were read in Ritchie’s technique<br />

modified by Yo<strong>un</strong>g et al, whereas one glass sli<strong>de</strong> per<br />

sample was read in Sheather’s technique modified<br />

by Huber et al.<br />

All sli<strong>de</strong>s were covered with a 24 x 32 mm<br />

coverslip, and viewing and photomicrography were<br />

ma<strong>de</strong> on a Olympus® Bx 41 binocular optical<br />

microscope with an increase of approximately<br />

100 times and confirmation in 400 times, coupled<br />

to a Sams<strong>un</strong>g® SDC415 digital camera, complete<br />

with Honestech® PVR capture software. For<br />

morphometry, we used an Olympus® CH30<br />

monocular optical microscope with 400 times<br />

magnification, and an ocular micrometer.<br />

Survey of surface antigens via Imm<strong>un</strong>odiagnosis:<br />

The Enzyme-linked Imm<strong>un</strong>osorbent Assay,<br />

ELISA, was conducted in all samples for survey<br />

of G. lamblia, Cryptosporidium sp., and E. histolytica.<br />

The kits were purchased commercially:<br />

Techlab ® Wampole Cryptosporidium II test, which<br />

surveys the antigens of the oocyst wall of Crypstosporidium<br />

sp.; Entamoeba Ridascreen ® , which<br />

surveys adhesins specific of E. histolytica (N-acetyl-D-galactosamine<br />

lectin inhibitor), present on<br />

the parasite membrane; and Giardia Ridascreen ® ,<br />

which surveys antigens specific of the cyst wall of<br />

G. lamblia.<br />

Before the performance of ELISA, a predilution<br />

of 60 μL of the sample and 60 μL of the<br />

diluent provi<strong>de</strong>d by manufacturer was performed,<br />

and 100 μL of this solution was transferred to the<br />

duplicate test plate. Then, we followed the protocol<br />

recommen<strong>de</strong>d by the manufacturer. The reading<br />

was ma<strong>de</strong> in ELISA rea<strong>de</strong>r (Testline® ELx 800)<br />

with wavelength according to the manufacturer’s<br />

technical standards.<br />

Statistical treatment of results: The McNemar’s<br />

statistical test with a significance level of 5% was<br />

used with comparison <strong>de</strong>gree of agreement between<br />

the laboratory techniques, using SPSS® (Statistical<br />

Package for Social Sciences, Chicago), of version<br />

17.0.<br />

RESULTS<br />

In the 48 water samples examined, was observed<br />

agreement applying Sheather’s modified<br />

and Ritchie’s modified techniques to <strong>de</strong>tect the<br />

amoeboid cyst with more than four nuclei, four-<br />

Rev. Ibero-Latinoam. Parasitol. (2012); 71 (1): 90-96

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!