Desigualdad Social y Equidad en Salud: Perspectivas Internacionales
Desigualdad Social y Equidad en Salud: Perspectivas Internacionales Desigualdad Social y Equidad en Salud: Perspectivas Internacionales
Freitas, P.F. (2000). The epidemic of caesarean sections in Brazil, factors influencing typeof delivery in Florianópolis, South Brazil. (PhD Thesis, London School of Hygiene andTropical Medicine, 2000).Freitas, P.F., Drachler, M.L., Leite, J.C.C., & Grassi, P.R. (2005).Social inequalities in caesareansection rates in primiparous. Revista de Saúde Pública, 39(5), 761-767.Hart, J. T. (1971). The inverse care law. Lancet, 1, 405–412.Krieger, N.(2001). A glossary for social epidemiology. Journal of Epidemiology and CommunityHealth, 55, 695-700.Misago, C., Freitas, P.F., Kendall, C., Haneda, K., Silveira, D., Onuky, D. et al. (2000).From 'culture of dehumanization of childbirth' to childbirth as a transformative experience:changes in five municipalities in north-east Brazil. International Journal ofGynaecology & Obstetrics, 75, 67-72.Moraes M., & Goldenberg, P. (2001). Cesarianas: um perfil epidêmico. Cadernos de SaúdePública,17, 509-19.Osis, M.J.D., Cecatti, J.G., Pádua, K.S., & Faúndes, A. (2006). Brazilian doctors' perspectiveon the second opinion strategy before a C-section. Revista de Saúde Pública, 40(2),233-239.Potter, J.E., Berquó, E., Perpétuo, I.H., Leal, O.F., Hopkins, K., Souza, M.R. et al. (2001).Unwanted caesarean sections among public and private patients in Brazil: prospectivestudy. British Medical Journal, 323, 1155-8.Puccini, R.F., Pedroso, G.C., da Silva, E.M., de Araujo, N.S., & da Silva, N.N. (2006).Prenatal and childbirth care equity in an area in Greater Metropolitan Sao Paulo, 1996.Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 19(1), 35-45.Reis, A., Marazina, I., & Gallo, P. (2004). A humanização na saúde como instância libertadora.Saúde e Sociedade, 13(3), 30-35.Ronsmans, C., De Brouwere, V., Dubourg, D., & Dieltiens, G. (2004) Measuring the needfor life-saving obstetric surgery in developing countries. BJOG: an international journalof obstetrics and gynaecology, 111(10):1027–30.Ronsmmans, C., Holtz, S., & Stanton, C. (2006). Socioeconomic differentials in caesareanrates in developing countries: a retrospective analysis. Lancet (368):1516–23.Roosmalen J.V., & Does, C.D.V.(1995). Caesarean birth rates worldwide. Tropical andGeographical Medicine, 47, 19-22.Shearer, E.L. (1993). Cesarean section: Medical benefits and costs. Social Science & Medicine,37, 1223-31.Souza Junior, J.C., Kunkel, N., Gomes, M.A., & Freitas, P.F. (2007). Inverse equity andinequalities in the use of technology in birth, in Santa Catarina, Brazil 2000-2004. RevistaBrasileira de Saúde Materno Infantil, 7 (4), 397-403.Tornquist, C. (2003). Paradoxos da humanização em uma maternidade no Brasil. Cadernosde Saúde Pública, 19, 419-427.Villar, J., Valladares, E., Wojdyla, D., Zavaleta, N., Carroli, G., Velazco, A. et al. (2006).WHO 2005 global survey on maternal and perinatal health research group. CaesareanFontoura, Drachler71
delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: the 2005 WHO global survey on maternal andperinatal health in Latin America. Lancet, 367, 1819-29.World Health Organization (1985). Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet, 326(2), 436-437.72 Desigualdades Sociais nas Taxas de Cesariana no Brasil
- Page 22 and 23: has to be discussed by taking into
- Page 24: Infante, A., I. de la Mata, et al.
- Page 27 and 28: vida (Keppel et al., 2005). Existen
- Page 29 and 30: El rangoEs una medida que puede ser
- Page 31 and 32: Desviación media relativaEs un est
- Page 33 and 34: tecimiento dividido por su compleme
- Page 35 and 36: Índice de concentraciónEn este í
- Page 37 and 38: heterocedásticos, por lo que un mo
- Page 39 and 40: variables en salud que los signatar
- Page 41 and 42: igualdad de las distribuciones, asu
- Page 43 and 44: Referencias bibliograficasAnand, S.
- Page 45 and 46: LOW, A. (2004) Measuring the gap: q
- Page 48: PARTE IIgénero, discapacidady desi
- Page 51 and 52: O Brasil apresenta uma das maiores
- Page 53 and 54: ções no entendimento dos fatores
- Page 55 and 56: ciada no pós-parto. Informação r
- Page 57 and 58: porção de analfabetismo e melhor
- Page 59 and 60: 1996% 1998% 2000% TOTAL Razão de C
- Page 61 and 62: Tabela 3. (E1). Razão de chance de
- Page 63 and 64: Variáveis N Cesariana % RPb RPaj I
- Page 65 and 66: Figura 1(E2). Variações temporais
- Page 67 and 68: Tabela 1.E3. Taxas de cesariana e R
- Page 69 and 70: Tabela 2.E4. Características da ce
- Page 71: ReferênciasAlthabe, F., Belizan, J
- Page 75 and 76: AntecedentesComo antecedentes en el
- Page 77 and 78: por la Sociedad Argentina de Cardio
- Page 79 and 80: Figura 2. Utilización de trombolí
- Page 81 and 82: Figura 6. Mortalidad en el IAM seg
- Page 83 and 84: Datos cualitativosLa información c
- Page 85 and 86: en cardiología en sus servicios ac
- Page 87 and 88: dado que las mujeres tienen arteria
- Page 89 and 90: d) Médicos con más de 10 años de
- Page 91 and 92: que el médico varón.Como puede ob
- Page 93 and 94: y los buenos equipos de trabajo. La
- Page 95 and 96: ConclusionesLa información analiza
- Page 97 and 98: en las mujeres para realizar consul
- Page 99 and 100: Es interesante observar que aun cua
- Page 101 and 102: Arango Y, (2000) "Autocuidado de la
- Page 103 and 104: Tajer D, Fernández AM, Cernadas J,
- Page 105 and 106: Conceptos y definicionesConcepto de
- Page 107 and 108: (ventaja / desventaja social, son o
- Page 109 and 110: Surge entonces la perspectiva de la
- Page 111 and 112: egistros), aunque es enorme y recog
- Page 113 and 114: Gráfica 1. Discapacitados encuesta
- Page 115 and 116: De esta forma se garantiza la impar
- Page 117 and 118: Gradiente en contra de los estratos
- Page 119 and 120: Gráfica 9. Mujeres discapacitadas
- Page 121 and 122: de accidentalidad por grupos de eda
Freitas, P.F. (2000). The epidemic of caesarean sections in Brazil, factors influ<strong>en</strong>cing typeof delivery in Florianópolis, South Brazil. (PhD Thesis, London School of Hygi<strong>en</strong>e andTropical Medicine, 2000).Freitas, P.F., Drachler, M.L., Leite, J.C.C., & Grassi, P.R. (2005).<strong>Social</strong> inequalities in caesareansection rates in primiparous. Revista de Saúde Pública, 39(5), 761-767.Hart, J. T. (1971). The inverse care law. Lancet, 1, 405–412.Krieger, N.(2001). A glossary for social epidemiology. Journal of Epidemiology and CommunityHealth, 55, 695-700.Misago, C., Freitas, P.F., K<strong>en</strong>dall, C., Haneda, K., Silveira, D., Onuky, D. et al. (2000).From 'culture of dehumanization of childbirth' to childbirth as a transformative experi<strong>en</strong>ce:changes in five municipalities in north-east Brazil. International Journal ofGynaecology & Obstetrics, 75, 67-72.Moraes M., & Gold<strong>en</strong>berg, P. (2001). Cesarianas: um perfil epidêmico. Cadernos de SaúdePública,17, 509-19.Osis, M.J.D., Cecatti, J.G., Pádua, K.S., & Faúndes, A. (2006). Brazilian doctors' perspectiveon the second opinion strategy before a C-section. Revista de Saúde Pública, 40(2),233-239.Potter, J.E., Berquó, E., Perpétuo, I.H., Leal, O.F., Hopkins, K., Souza, M.R. et al. (2001).Unwanted caesarean sections among public and private pati<strong>en</strong>ts in Brazil: prospectivestudy. British Medical Journal, 323, 1155-8.Puccini, R.F., Pedroso, G.C., da Silva, E.M., de Araujo, N.S., & da Silva, N.N. (2006).Pr<strong>en</strong>atal and childbirth care equity in an area in Greater Metropolitan Sao Paulo, 1996.Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 19(1), 35-45.Reis, A., Marazina, I., & Gallo, P. (2004). A humanização na saúde como instância libertadora.Saúde e Sociedade, 13(3), 30-35.Ronsmans, C., De Brouwere, V., Dubourg, D., & Dielti<strong>en</strong>s, G. (2004) Measuring the needfor life-saving obstetric surgery in developing countries. BJOG: an international journalof obstetrics and gynaecology, 111(10):1027–30.Ronsmmans, C., Holtz, S., & Stanton, C. (2006). Socioeconomic differ<strong>en</strong>tials in caesareanrates in developing countries: a retrospective analysis. Lancet (368):1516–23.Roosmal<strong>en</strong> J.V., & Does, C.D.V.(1995). Caesarean birth rates worldwide. Tropical andGeographical Medicine, 47, 19-22.Shearer, E.L. (1993). Cesarean section: Medical b<strong>en</strong>efits and costs. <strong>Social</strong> Sci<strong>en</strong>ce & Medicine,37, 1223-31.Souza Junior, J.C., Kunkel, N., Gomes, M.A., & Freitas, P.F. (2007). Inverse equity andinequalities in the use of technology in birth, in Santa Catarina, Brazil 2000-2004. RevistaBrasileira de Saúde Materno Infantil, 7 (4), 397-403.Tornquist, C. (2003). Paradoxos da humanização em uma maternidade no Brasil. Cadernosde Saúde Pública, 19, 419-427.Villar, J., Valladares, E., Wojdyla, D., Zavaleta, N., Carroli, G., Velazco, A. et al. (2006).WHO 2005 global survey on maternal and perinatal health research group. CaesareanFontoura, Drachler71
Change language