Desigualdad Social y Equidad en Salud: Perspectivas Internacionales
Desigualdad Social y Equidad en Salud: Perspectivas Internacionales Desigualdad Social y Equidad en Salud: Perspectivas Internacionales
Tabela 1.E5. Complicações no pós-parto de acordo com tipo de partoTipo de partoComplicações no Pós-Parton/N (%) RP Valor de pComplicações físicasCesariana 47/130 36,2 1,49Vaginal 17/70 24,3 refDistúrbios do sonoCesariana 36/130 27,7 1,76Vaginal 11/70 15,7 refAnsiedadeCesariana 47/130 36,2 1,49Vaginal 17/70 24,3 refLimitação das atividades domésticas devido à dorCesariana 35/130 26,9 1,71Vaginal 11/70 15,7 refVolta às atividades domésticas com restriçãoCesariana 22/61 36,1 3,25Vaginal 7/63 11,1 ref*Razões de prevalência ajustadas para idade, escolaridade e frequência ao pré-natal0.0510.063
ReferênciasAlthabe, F., Belizan, J., Villar, J., Alexander, S., Bergel, E., Ramos, S., et al. (2004). Mandatorysecond opinion to reduce rates of unnecessary caesarean sections in Latin America:a cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 363,1934-40.Barros F.C., Vaughan, J.P., Victora, C.G., & Huttly, S.R. (1991). Epidemic of caesareansections in Brazil. Lancet. (338), 167-9.Barros, F.C., Victora, C.G., Barros, A.J., Santos, I.S., Albernaz, E., Matijasevich, A. etal. (2005). The challenge of reducing neonatal mortality in middle-income countries:findings from three Brazilian birth cohorts in 1982, 1993, and 2004. Lancet. (365),847-54.Béhague, D.P., Victora, C.G., & Barros, F.C. (2002). Consumer demand for caesareansections in Brazil: population based birth cohort study linking ethnographic and epidemiologicalmethods. British Medical Journal, 324, 942-945.Belizám, J.M., Althabe, F., Barros, F.C., & Alexander, S. (1999). Rates and implicationsof caesarean sections in Latin America: an ecological study. British Medical Journal,319:1397-102.BRASIL (2000) Ministério do Desevolvimento Social. Programa de humanização no pré-natale nascimento. Brasília: Secretaria de Políticas de Saúde.BRASIL (2004). Ministério do Desevolvimento Social. Política Nacional de Humanização:documento base para gestores e trabalhadores do SUS/Ministério da Saúde. Brasília.Curet, LB, Zachman, RD., Rao, AV, Poole, WK, Morrison, J, & Burkett, G (1998), ‘Effectof mode of delivery on incidence of respiratory distress syndrome’, BJOG: an InternationalJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 27, no.2, pp.165-70.DATASUS. Departamento de Informática do Sistema Único de Saúde. (2006) [July 21, 2009].Available from World Wide Web:http:// tabnet.datasus.gov.br/ tabdata/sinasc/dados/nov_indice.htm.de Mello e Souza C. (1994). C-sections as ideal births: The cultural construction ofbeneficence and patients' rights in Brazil. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics,(3), 358-66.Enkin, M., Keirse, M., Renfrew, M., & Neilson, J. A (1996). Guide to Effective Care inPregnancy and Childbirth. New York: Oxford University Press.Faundes, A., & Cecatti, J. (1993). Which policy for caesarian section in Brazil? Analysis oftrends and consequences. Health Policy and Plan, 8, 33-42.Faúndes, A., Pádua, K.S., Osis, M.J., Cecatti, J.G., & Sousa, M.H. (2004). Brazilian womenand physician's viewpoints on their preferred route of delivery. Revista de SaúdePública, 38(4), 488-494.Faundes, A., Silveira, D.M., Coutinho, E., De Oliveira, H.C., Conceição, I.S., Lopes, I.D.et al. (1994). Physicians denounce precariousness of reproductive health in the countryand propose an addendum to the Brazilian document for the Cairo conference. PlanejamentoAgora,10(249):7-8.70 Desigualdades Sociais nas Taxas de Cesariana no Brasil
- Page 20 and 21: esults of the decentralization in t
- Page 22 and 23: has to be discussed by taking into
- Page 24: Infante, A., I. de la Mata, et al.
- Page 27 and 28: vida (Keppel et al., 2005). Existen
- Page 29 and 30: El rangoEs una medida que puede ser
- Page 31 and 32: Desviación media relativaEs un est
- Page 33 and 34: tecimiento dividido por su compleme
- Page 35 and 36: Índice de concentraciónEn este í
- Page 37 and 38: heterocedásticos, por lo que un mo
- Page 39 and 40: variables en salud que los signatar
- Page 41 and 42: igualdad de las distribuciones, asu
- Page 43 and 44: Referencias bibliograficasAnand, S.
- Page 45 and 46: LOW, A. (2004) Measuring the gap: q
- Page 48: PARTE IIgénero, discapacidady desi
- Page 51 and 52: O Brasil apresenta uma das maiores
- Page 53 and 54: ções no entendimento dos fatores
- Page 55 and 56: ciada no pós-parto. Informação r
- Page 57 and 58: porção de analfabetismo e melhor
- Page 59 and 60: 1996% 1998% 2000% TOTAL Razão de C
- Page 61 and 62: Tabela 3. (E1). Razão de chance de
- Page 63 and 64: Variáveis N Cesariana % RPb RPaj I
- Page 65 and 66: Figura 1(E2). Variações temporais
- Page 67 and 68: Tabela 1.E3. Taxas de cesariana e R
- Page 69: Tabela 2.E4. Características da ce
- Page 73 and 74: delivery rates and pregnancy outcom
- Page 75 and 76: AntecedentesComo antecedentes en el
- Page 77 and 78: por la Sociedad Argentina de Cardio
- Page 79 and 80: Figura 2. Utilización de trombolí
- Page 81 and 82: Figura 6. Mortalidad en el IAM seg
- Page 83 and 84: Datos cualitativosLa información c
- Page 85 and 86: en cardiología en sus servicios ac
- Page 87 and 88: dado que las mujeres tienen arteria
- Page 89 and 90: d) Médicos con más de 10 años de
- Page 91 and 92: que el médico varón.Como puede ob
- Page 93 and 94: y los buenos equipos de trabajo. La
- Page 95 and 96: ConclusionesLa información analiza
- Page 97 and 98: en las mujeres para realizar consul
- Page 99 and 100: Es interesante observar que aun cua
- Page 101 and 102: Arango Y, (2000) "Autocuidado de la
- Page 103 and 104: Tajer D, Fernández AM, Cernadas J,
- Page 105 and 106: Conceptos y definicionesConcepto de
- Page 107 and 108: (ventaja / desventaja social, son o
- Page 109 and 110: Surge entonces la perspectiva de la
- Page 111 and 112: egistros), aunque es enorme y recog
- Page 113 and 114: Gráfica 1. Discapacitados encuesta
- Page 115 and 116: De esta forma se garantiza la impar
- Page 117 and 118: Gradiente en contra de los estratos
- Page 119 and 120: Gráfica 9. Mujeres discapacitadas
ReferênciasAlthabe, F., Belizan, J., Villar, J., Alexander, S., Bergel, E., Ramos, S., et al. (2004). Mandatorysecond opinion to reduce rates of unnecessary caesarean sections in Latin America:a cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 363,1934-40.Barros F.C., Vaughan, J.P., Victora, C.G., & Huttly, S.R. (1991). Epidemic of caesareansections in Brazil. Lancet. (338), 167-9.Barros, F.C., Victora, C.G., Barros, A.J., Santos, I.S., Albernaz, E., Matijasevich, A. etal. (2005). The chall<strong>en</strong>ge of reducing neonatal mortality in middle-income countries:findings from three Brazilian birth cohorts in 1982, 1993, and 2004. Lancet. (365),847-54.Béhague, D.P., Victora, C.G., & Barros, F.C. (2002). Consumer demand for caesareansections in Brazil: population based birth cohort study linking ethnographic and epidemiologicalmethods. British Medical Journal, 324, 942-945.Belizám, J.M., Althabe, F., Barros, F.C., & Alexander, S. (1999). Rates and implicationsof caesarean sections in Latin America: an ecological study. British Medical Journal,319:1397-102.BRASIL (2000) Ministério do Desevolvim<strong>en</strong>to <strong>Social</strong>. Programa de humanização no pré-natale nascim<strong>en</strong>to. Brasília: Secretaria de Políticas de Saúde.BRASIL (2004). Ministério do Desevolvim<strong>en</strong>to <strong>Social</strong>. Política Nacional de Humanização:docum<strong>en</strong>to base para gestores e trabalhadores do SUS/Ministério da Saúde. Brasília.Curet, LB, Zachman, RD., Rao, AV, Poole, WK, Morrison, J, & Burkett, G (1998), ‘Effectof mode of delivery on incid<strong>en</strong>ce of respiratory distress syndrome’, BJOG: an InternationalJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 27, no.2, pp.165-70.DATASUS. Departam<strong>en</strong>to de Informática do Sistema Único de Saúde. (2006) [July 21, 2009].Available from World Wide Web:http:// tabnet.datasus.gov.br/ tabdata/sinasc/dados/nov_indice.htm.de Mello e Souza C. (1994). C-sections as ideal births: The cultural construction ofb<strong>en</strong>efic<strong>en</strong>ce and pati<strong>en</strong>ts' rights in Brazil. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics,(3), 358-66.Enkin, M., Keirse, M., R<strong>en</strong>frew, M., & Neilson, J. A (1996). Guide to Effective Care inPregnancy and Childbirth. New York: Oxford University Press.Faundes, A., & Cecatti, J. (1993). Which policy for caesarian section in Brazil? Analysis oftr<strong>en</strong>ds and consequ<strong>en</strong>ces. Health Policy and Plan, 8, 33-42.Faúndes, A., Pádua, K.S., Osis, M.J., Cecatti, J.G., & Sousa, M.H. (2004). Brazilian wom<strong>en</strong>and physician's viewpoints on their preferred route of delivery. Revista de SaúdePública, 38(4), 488-494.Faundes, A., Silveira, D.M., Coutinho, E., De Oliveira, H.C., Conceição, I.S., Lopes, I.D.et al. (1994). Physicians d<strong>en</strong>ounce precariousness of reproductive health in the countryand propose an add<strong>en</strong>dum to the Brazilian docum<strong>en</strong>t for the Cairo confer<strong>en</strong>ce. Planejam<strong>en</strong>toAgora,10(249):7-8.70 <strong>Desigualdad</strong>es Sociais nas Taxas de Cesariana no Brasil