Desigualdad Social y Equidad en Salud: Perspectivas Internacionales

Desigualdad Social y Equidad en Salud: Perspectivas Internacionales Desigualdad Social y Equidad en Salud: Perspectivas Internacionales

11.07.2015 Views

Tabela 1.E5. Complicações no pós-parto de acordo com tipo de partoTipo de partoComplicações no Pós-Parton/N (%) RP Valor de pComplicações físicasCesariana 47/130 36,2 1,49Vaginal 17/70 24,3 refDistúrbios do sonoCesariana 36/130 27,7 1,76Vaginal 11/70 15,7 refAnsiedadeCesariana 47/130 36,2 1,49Vaginal 17/70 24,3 refLimitação das atividades domésticas devido à dorCesariana 35/130 26,9 1,71Vaginal 11/70 15,7 refVolta às atividades domésticas com restriçãoCesariana 22/61 36,1 3,25Vaginal 7/63 11,1 ref*Razões de prevalência ajustadas para idade, escolaridade e frequência ao pré-natal0.0510.063

ReferênciasAlthabe, F., Belizan, J., Villar, J., Alexander, S., Bergel, E., Ramos, S., et al. (2004). Mandatorysecond opinion to reduce rates of unnecessary caesarean sections in Latin America:a cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 363,1934-40.Barros F.C., Vaughan, J.P., Victora, C.G., & Huttly, S.R. (1991). Epidemic of caesareansections in Brazil. Lancet. (338), 167-9.Barros, F.C., Victora, C.G., Barros, A.J., Santos, I.S., Albernaz, E., Matijasevich, A. etal. (2005). The challenge of reducing neonatal mortality in middle-income countries:findings from three Brazilian birth cohorts in 1982, 1993, and 2004. Lancet. (365),847-54.Béhague, D.P., Victora, C.G., & Barros, F.C. (2002). Consumer demand for caesareansections in Brazil: population based birth cohort study linking ethnographic and epidemiologicalmethods. British Medical Journal, 324, 942-945.Belizám, J.M., Althabe, F., Barros, F.C., & Alexander, S. (1999). Rates and implicationsof caesarean sections in Latin America: an ecological study. British Medical Journal,319:1397-102.BRASIL (2000) Ministério do Desevolvimento Social. Programa de humanização no pré-natale nascimento. Brasília: Secretaria de Políticas de Saúde.BRASIL (2004). Ministério do Desevolvimento Social. Política Nacional de Humanização:documento base para gestores e trabalhadores do SUS/Ministério da Saúde. Brasília.Curet, LB, Zachman, RD., Rao, AV, Poole, WK, Morrison, J, & Burkett, G (1998), ‘Effectof mode of delivery on incidence of respiratory distress syndrome’, BJOG: an InternationalJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 27, no.2, pp.165-70.DATASUS. Departamento de Informática do Sistema Único de Saúde. (2006) [July 21, 2009].Available from World Wide Web:http:// tabnet.datasus.gov.br/ tabdata/sinasc/dados/nov_indice.htm.de Mello e Souza C. (1994). C-sections as ideal births: The cultural construction ofbeneficence and patients' rights in Brazil. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics,(3), 358-66.Enkin, M., Keirse, M., Renfrew, M., & Neilson, J. A (1996). Guide to Effective Care inPregnancy and Childbirth. New York: Oxford University Press.Faundes, A., & Cecatti, J. (1993). Which policy for caesarian section in Brazil? Analysis oftrends and consequences. Health Policy and Plan, 8, 33-42.Faúndes, A., Pádua, K.S., Osis, M.J., Cecatti, J.G., & Sousa, M.H. (2004). Brazilian womenand physician's viewpoints on their preferred route of delivery. Revista de SaúdePública, 38(4), 488-494.Faundes, A., Silveira, D.M., Coutinho, E., De Oliveira, H.C., Conceição, I.S., Lopes, I.D.et al. (1994). Physicians denounce precariousness of reproductive health in the countryand propose an addendum to the Brazilian document for the Cairo conference. PlanejamentoAgora,10(249):7-8.70 Desigualdades Sociais nas Taxas de Cesariana no Brasil

ReferênciasAlthabe, F., Belizan, J., Villar, J., Alexander, S., Bergel, E., Ramos, S., et al. (2004). Mandatorysecond opinion to reduce rates of unnecessary caesarean sections in Latin America:a cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 363,1934-40.Barros F.C., Vaughan, J.P., Victora, C.G., & Huttly, S.R. (1991). Epidemic of caesareansections in Brazil. Lancet. (338), 167-9.Barros, F.C., Victora, C.G., Barros, A.J., Santos, I.S., Albernaz, E., Matijasevich, A. etal. (2005). The chall<strong>en</strong>ge of reducing neonatal mortality in middle-income countries:findings from three Brazilian birth cohorts in 1982, 1993, and 2004. Lancet. (365),847-54.Béhague, D.P., Victora, C.G., & Barros, F.C. (2002). Consumer demand for caesareansections in Brazil: population based birth cohort study linking ethnographic and epidemiologicalmethods. British Medical Journal, 324, 942-945.Belizám, J.M., Althabe, F., Barros, F.C., & Alexander, S. (1999). Rates and implicationsof caesarean sections in Latin America: an ecological study. British Medical Journal,319:1397-102.BRASIL (2000) Ministério do Desevolvim<strong>en</strong>to <strong>Social</strong>. Programa de humanização no pré-natale nascim<strong>en</strong>to. Brasília: Secretaria de Políticas de Saúde.BRASIL (2004). Ministério do Desevolvim<strong>en</strong>to <strong>Social</strong>. Política Nacional de Humanização:docum<strong>en</strong>to base para gestores e trabalhadores do SUS/Ministério da Saúde. Brasília.Curet, LB, Zachman, RD., Rao, AV, Poole, WK, Morrison, J, & Burkett, G (1998), ‘Effectof mode of delivery on incid<strong>en</strong>ce of respiratory distress syndrome’, BJOG: an InternationalJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 27, no.2, pp.165-70.DATASUS. Departam<strong>en</strong>to de Informática do Sistema Único de Saúde. (2006) [July 21, 2009].Available from World Wide Web:http:// tabnet.datasus.gov.br/ tabdata/sinasc/dados/nov_indice.htm.de Mello e Souza C. (1994). C-sections as ideal births: The cultural construction ofb<strong>en</strong>efic<strong>en</strong>ce and pati<strong>en</strong>ts' rights in Brazil. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics,(3), 358-66.Enkin, M., Keirse, M., R<strong>en</strong>frew, M., & Neilson, J. A (1996). Guide to Effective Care inPregnancy and Childbirth. New York: Oxford University Press.Faundes, A., & Cecatti, J. (1993). Which policy for caesarian section in Brazil? Analysis oftr<strong>en</strong>ds and consequ<strong>en</strong>ces. Health Policy and Plan, 8, 33-42.Faúndes, A., Pádua, K.S., Osis, M.J., Cecatti, J.G., & Sousa, M.H. (2004). Brazilian wom<strong>en</strong>and physician's viewpoints on their preferred route of delivery. Revista de SaúdePública, 38(4), 488-494.Faundes, A., Silveira, D.M., Coutinho, E., De Oliveira, H.C., Conceição, I.S., Lopes, I.D.et al. (1994). Physicians d<strong>en</strong>ounce precariousness of reproductive health in the countryand propose an add<strong>en</strong>dum to the Brazilian docum<strong>en</strong>t for the Cairo confer<strong>en</strong>ce. Planejam<strong>en</strong>toAgora,10(249):7-8.70 <strong>Desigualdad</strong>es Sociais nas Taxas de Cesariana no Brasil

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!