Portada Simposios - Supplements - Haematologica

Portada Simposios - Supplements - Haematologica Portada Simposios - Supplements - Haematologica

supplements.haematologica.org
from supplements.haematologica.org More from this publisher
02.01.2015 Views

250 Haematologica (ed. esp.), volumen 85, supl. 2, octubre 2000 marcador que demostró una diferencia significativa entre éstos grupos siendo 21 %, 27 % y 83 % respectivamente. A pesar de que en el grupo de LLC/PL hay pocos casos, este resultado es concordante con lo descrito recientemente en la literatura 18,19 . El inmunofenotipo de la LLC atípica no difiere de la LLC típica, excepto en la expresión de CD38. Al igual que en el linfoma del manto las variantes morfológicas de la LLC no se corresponden con fenotipos distintos. El diagnóstico diferencial de la LLC atípica plantea problemas en algunos casos de linfoma del manto, sobretodo aquellos que expresan CD23 y la morfología es de célula pequeña similar a la LLC. Un marcador que ayuda para diferenciar éstos procesos es el FMC-7, este marcador detecta un grupo de leucemias/linfomas B en un estadio mas maduro. Creemos que la valoración conjunta de CD79b, FMC-7 e IgS permite separar la mayoría de casos de LLC y LCM CD23 positivo. Tworek et al 20 comprueban que el CD11c es un marcador válido para diferenciar LLC de LCM ya que en este último es constantemente negativo. En nuestra experiencia el CD11c fue positivo en el 57 % de casos de LCM sí bien en un porcentaje de células inferior al 50 % y en la LLC fue positivo en el 76 % de casos en un porcentaje siempre superior al 50 % de células. Creemos que los casos de leucemias crónicas con fenotipo heterogéneo (CD5– y/o CD23–) y morfología atípica, es mejor denominarlos SLPC-B no clasificable. Además, muchos de estos casos no tienen adenopatías ni esplenomegalia por lo que tampoco la histología nos permite llegar a un diagnóstico correcto. Conclusiones Para interpretar correctamente un fenotipo linfocitario debemos conocer el comportamiento de los linfocitos normales delante de los distintos anticuerpos monoclonales. El inmunofenotipo es útil para diferenciar poblaciones linfoides reactivas de poblaciones malignas; delante de una población maligna nos permite diferenciar si es línea B o T; en el caso de las proliferaciones B nos permite demostrar clonalidad mediante la restricción de cadenas de IgS. La utilidad del fenotipo para discriminar los distintos síndromes linfoproliferativos debe basarse en un panel amplio de monoclonales, ya que no hay un marcador único específico de ningún SLPC. Debemos valorar el porcentaje de células positivas para cada marcador y la intensidad de expresión del mismo. Los marcadores no específicos de línea B deben utilizarse en dobles o triples marcajes (CD23, CD5, CD10, CD38) unidos a un marcador de línea B. En el linfoma del manto, el inmunofenotipo es un dato más a añadir a los otros marcadores bien definidos de este linfoma y a interpretar en conjunto. La coexpresión de CD19/CD5 nos permite detectar pequeñas poblaciones en MO y sangre periférica al diagnóstico, así como en el seguimiento y monitorización del tratamiento. El fenotipo es de gran utilidad en aquellos casos en que la célula del manto tiene una morfología similar a la LLC, o en algunos casos de LCM que son CD23 positivos. En el linfoma folicular la utilidad del fenotipo es más restringida debido a que la expresión en sangre periférica es infrecuente al diagnóstico y la infiltración medular puede ser únicamente paratrabecular lo que dificulta la obtención de células malignas. El inmunofenotipo en ganglio es un complemento a la histología e IHQ. La expresión de CD10 como característica fenotípica que le diferencia de otros linfomas, no es una parámetro útil si no está apoyado por la restricción de cadenas de IgS, dado que existen poblaciones normales de linfocitos en MO que expresan CD10 y poblaciones de linfoma folicular que no expresan CD10. Este es un dato importante a valorar sobre todo cuando buscamos poblaciones pequeñas o enfermedad mínima residual. En la LLC el inmunofenotipo es un arma diagnóstica de primera línea junto con la morfología, ya que la mayoría de los pacientes no presentan adenopatías y la biopsia ósea tiene más valor pronóstico que diagnóstico. En casos de LLC de morfología atípica nos permite diferenciarla de otros SLPC-B. El fenotipo es útil para diferenciar las LLC atípicas con centrocitos del linfoma folicular y del linfoma del manto. En resumen, el fenotipo es una arma imprescindible en las leucemias linfoides crónicas. En el estudio de los linfomas es un arma complementaria a las demás técnicas diagnósticas, siempre que se disponga de histología. En aquellos SLPC-B en los que no disponemos de histología ganglionar o esplénica por ausencia de organomegalias, el fenotipo es de gran utilidad. También es útil en muestras de punción aspiración con aguja fina (ganglio, mediastino, masa tumoral) y líquidos orgánicos como proceso inicial para orientar el diagnóstico. El inmunofenotipo respecto a otras técnicas diagnósticas tiene la ventaja de ser rápido, detectar pequeñas poblaciones de células y ser fiable si esta bien interpretado. Agradecimientos Agradecemos la colaboración técnica de Sonia Ramón, Magda Cuscó y Josefina Roura. Agradecemos a la Dra T. Vallespí sus consejos en la elaboración de este manuscrito y al Club Catalán de Citología. Parte de este trabajo se ha realizado con la ayuda de una Beca de la Fundación Pi i Sunyer de la CSUB de Bellvitge. Bibliografía 1. G Rothe, G Smithz for the working group on flow cytometry and image analysis. Consensus protocol for the flow cytometric immunophenotyping of hematopoietic malignancies. Leukemia 1996; 10: 877-895. 2. Davis BH, Foucar K, Szczarkowski W et al. U.S. Canadian Consensus recommendations on the immunophenotypic analysis of hematologic neoplasia by flow cytometry: Medical indications. Cytometry 1997; 30: 249-263. 3. Borowitz MJ, Bray R, Gascoyne R. U.S. Canadian Consensus recommendations on the immunophenotypic analysis of hematologic neoplasia by flow cytometry: Data analysis and interpretation. Cytometry 1997; 30: 236-244.

XLII Reunión Nacional de la AEHH y XVI Congreso de la SETH. Simposios 251 4. ES Jaffe. Hematopathology: integration of morphologic features and biologic markers for diagnosis. Mod Pathol 1999; 12: 109-115. 5. K Foucar. Chronic lymphoid leukemias and lymphoproliferative disorders. Mod Pathol 1999; 12: 141-150. 6. DiGiuseppe JA, Borowitz MJ. Clinical utility of Flow cytometry in the chronic lymphoid leukemias. Semin Oncol 1998; 25: 6-10. 7. Harris N, Jaffe E, Stein H et al. A Revised European-American classification of lymphoid neoplasm. A proposal from the international lymphoma study group. Blood 1994; 84: 1361-1392. 8. Harris LH, Jaffe ES, Diebold J et al. World Health Organization classification of neoplastic diseases of tha hematopoietic and lymphoid tissues: Report of the clinical advisory committee meeting. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17: 3835-3849. 9. Cohen PL, Kurtin PJ, Donovan KA et al. Bone marrow and peripheral blood involvement in mantle cell lymphoma. Br J Haematol 1998;101: 302-310. 10. Argatoff LH, Connors JM, Klasa RJ et al. Mantle cell lymphoma: a clinicopathologic study of 80 cases. Blood 1997; 6: 2067-2078. 11. Bennet J, Catovsky D, Daniel MT et al: Proposals for the classification of chronic (mature) B and T lymphoid leukemias. Br J Haematol 1989; 42: 567-584. 12. Matutes E, Owusu-Ankomah K, Morilla R et al. The immunologic profile of B-cell disorders and proposal of a scoring system for the diagnosis of CLL. Leukemia 1994; 8: 1640-1645. 13. Pangalis GA, Angelopoulou MK, Vassilakopoulos TP et al. B-chronic lymphocytic leukemia, small lymphocytic lymphoma and lynphoplasmacytic lymphoma, including Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia: A clinical, morphologic and biologic spectrum of similar disorders. Semin Hematol 1999; 36: 104-114. 14. Shapiro JL, Miller ML, Pohlman B et al. Cd5– B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders presenting in blood and bone marrow. Hematopathology 1999; 111: 477-487. 15. Bell PB, Rooney N, Bosanquet A. CD79a detected by ZL7.4 separates chronic lymphocytic eukemia from mantle cell lymphoma phase. Cytometry 1999; 38: 102-105. 16. Zomas AP, Matutes E, Morilla R et al. Expression of the immunoglobulin-associated protein B29 in B cell disorders with the monoclonal antibody SN8 (CD79b). Leukemia 1996; 10: 1966-1970. 17. Hanson CA, Kurtin PJ, Katzmann JA et al. Immunophenotypic analysis of peripheral blood and bone marrow in the staging of B-cell malignant lymphoma. Blood 1999; 94: 3889-3896. 18. Damle RN, Wasil T, Fais F et al. IgV gene mutation status and CD38 expression as novel prognostic indicators in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 1999; 94: 1840-1847. 19. Hamblin TJ, Davis Z, Gardiner A et al. Unmutated IgVh genes are associated with a more aggressive form of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 1999; 94: 1848-1854. 20. Tworek JA, Singleton TP, Schnitzer B et al. Flow cytometric and immunohistichemical analysis of small lymphocytic lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma and plasmacytoid small lymphocytic lymphoma. Am J Clin Pathol 1999; 110: 582-589. CYTOGENETIC AND MOLECULAR CYTOGENETIC FEATURES OF NON-HODGKIN’S LYMPHOMA OF LYMPHOID FOLLICLE ORIGIN (FOLLICLE CENTRE CELL AND MANTLE CELL) A. CUNEO, R. BIGONI, M. GRAZIA ROBERTI, A. BARDI, G. MATTEO RIGOLIN, P. AGOSTINI, R. MILANI, F. CAVAZZINI, C. DE ANGELI AND G. CASTOLDI Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche e Terapie Avanzate. Sezione di Ematologia. Università di Ferrara, Via Savonarola, 9 – 44100 Ferrara, Italy Introduction A number of recurrent chromosome translocations have been detected in lymphoid neoplasias, well characterized by molecular genetic studies, highlighting fundamental mechanisms of neoplastic transformation. Some translocations showed an association with specific clinicopathologic types: with few exceptions, the t(14;18) is a diagnostic feature of follicle centre cell lymphoma; the t(11;14)(q13;q32) indicates the origin of lymphoma cells from the follicle mantle, the t(8;14)(q24;q32) identifies Burkitt’s lymphoma and related disorders, the t(3;V)(q27;V) defines a genetically distinct subgroup of diffuse large cell lymphoma, the t(2;5)(p23;q35) and the related NPM/ALK fusion protein is the hallmark of CD30+ anaplastic large cell lymphoma. A growing body of evidence has accumulated over the last 10 years suggesting that so-called “secondary” chromosome changes play an important role in determining the clinical phenotype in lymphoid tumors 1-3 . Additional chromosome changes were shown to consist mostly of unbalanced rearrangements, leading to DNA gain or loss, and the cytogenetic profile of each form of lymphoma was found to vary according to the primary anomaly defining the stemline. Thus, while trisomy 7 and trisomy 12 occurred at a relatively high incidence in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) of follicle centre cell lineage carrying the t(14;18), monosomy 13, –Y, 6q– were listed among the most frequent aberrations occurring in addition to the 11;14 translocation in MCL. The development of molecular cytogenetic techniques, i.e. fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) allowed for a more definite assessment of the cytogentic profile of NHL. The significance of primary and secondary chromosome lesions in follicle centre cell lymphoma (FCCL) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) are summarized in this report, with reference to the correlation with clinicopathological features. Follicle centre cell lymphoma (FCCL) FCCL accounts for as many as 40 % of all NHL in western countries. This lymphoid tumor consists of a proliferation of centrocytes/centroblasts unable to progress through the germinal centre, harbouring somatic hypermutation of the IgV genes and ongoing mutations (antigen driven stimulation). The immunophenotype is typically pan-B+; CD10+/–; CD5–; sIg+. The primary chromosomal aberration is the t(14;18)(q32,q21) fusing the Ig heavy chain gene and the BCL2 gene. This chromosomal rearrangement can be detected in 70-80 % of the cases by conventional cytogenetic analysis, by southern blotting and by FISH. In most studies evidence was provided that this chromosomal rearrangement does not have an impact on prognosis 1,4 . A study found a correlation between prognosis and the breakpoint location in the BCL2 region, with a 95 %, 76 % and 57 % three-year failure free survival in those cases with mbr, MBR and germline BCL2 configuration, respectively 5 .

XLII Reunión Nacional de la AEHH y XVI Congreso de la SETH. <strong>Simposios</strong><br />

251<br />

4. ES Jaffe. Hematopathology: integration of morphologic features and<br />

biologic markers for diagnosis. Mod Pathol 1999; 12: 109-115.<br />

5. K Foucar. Chronic lymphoid leukemias and lymphoproliferative disorders.<br />

Mod Pathol 1999; 12: 141-150.<br />

6. DiGiuseppe JA, Borowitz MJ. Clinical utility of Flow cytometry in the chronic<br />

lymphoid leukemias. Semin Oncol 1998; 25: 6-10.<br />

7. Harris N, Jaffe E, Stein H et al. A Revised European-American classification<br />

of lymphoid neoplasm. A proposal from the international lymphoma<br />

study group. Blood 1994; 84: 1361-1392.<br />

8. Harris LH, Jaffe ES, Diebold J et al. World Health Organization classification<br />

of neoplastic diseases of tha hematopoietic and lymphoid tissues:<br />

Report of the clinical advisory committee meeting. J Clin Oncol<br />

1999; 17: 3835-3849.<br />

9. Cohen PL, Kurtin PJ, Donovan KA et al. Bone marrow and peripheral<br />

blood involvement in mantle cell lymphoma. Br J Haematol 1998;101:<br />

302-310.<br />

10. Argatoff LH, Connors JM, Klasa RJ et al. Mantle cell lymphoma: a clinicopathologic<br />

study of 80 cases. Blood 1997; 6: 2067-2078.<br />

11. Bennet J, Catovsky D, Daniel MT et al: Proposals for the classification of<br />

chronic (mature) B and T lymphoid leukemias. Br J Haematol 1989; 42:<br />

567-584.<br />

12. Matutes E, Owusu-Ankomah K, Morilla R et al. The immunologic profile<br />

of B-cell disorders and proposal of a scoring system for the diagnosis<br />

of CLL. Leukemia 1994; 8: 1640-1645.<br />

13. Pangalis GA, Angelopoulou MK, Vassilakopoulos TP et al. B-chronic<br />

lymphocytic leukemia, small lymphocytic lymphoma and lynphoplasmacytic<br />

lymphoma, including Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia: A<br />

clinical, morphologic and biologic spectrum of similar disorders. Semin<br />

Hematol 1999; 36: 104-114.<br />

14. Shapiro JL, Miller ML, Pohlman B et al. Cd5– B-cell lymphoproliferative<br />

disorders presenting in blood and bone marrow. Hematopathology<br />

1999; 111: 477-487.<br />

15. Bell PB, Rooney N, Bosanquet A. CD79a detected by ZL7.4 separates<br />

chronic lymphocytic eukemia from mantle cell lymphoma phase. Cytometry<br />

1999; 38: 102-105.<br />

16. Zomas AP, Matutes E, Morilla R et al. Expression of the immunoglobulin-associated<br />

protein B29 in B cell disorders with the monoclonal<br />

antibody SN8 (CD79b). Leukemia 1996; 10: 1966-1970.<br />

17. Hanson CA, Kurtin PJ, Katzmann JA et al. Immunophenotypic analysis<br />

of peripheral blood and bone marrow in the staging of B-cell malignant<br />

lymphoma. Blood 1999; 94: 3889-3896.<br />

18. Damle RN, Wasil T, Fais F et al. IgV gene mutation status and CD38 expression<br />

as novel prognostic indicators in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.<br />

Blood 1999; 94: 1840-1847.<br />

19. Hamblin TJ, Davis Z, Gardiner A et al. Unmutated IgVh genes are associated<br />

with a more aggressive form of chronic lymphocytic leukemia.<br />

Blood 1999; 94: 1848-1854.<br />

20. Tworek JA, Singleton TP, Schnitzer B et al. Flow cytometric and immunohistichemical<br />

analysis of small lymphocytic lymphoma, mantle cell<br />

lymphoma and plasmacytoid small lymphocytic lymphoma. Am J Clin<br />

Pathol 1999; 110: 582-589.<br />

CYTOGENETIC AND MOLECULAR<br />

CYTOGENETIC FEATURES<br />

OF NON-HODGKIN’S LYMPHOMA<br />

OF LYMPHOID FOLLICLE ORIGIN<br />

(FOLLICLE CENTRE CELL<br />

AND MANTLE CELL)<br />

A. CUNEO, R. BIGONI, M. GRAZIA ROBERTI,<br />

A. BARDI, G. MATTEO RIGOLIN, P. AGOSTINI,<br />

R. MILANI, F. CAVAZZINI, C. DE ANGELI<br />

AND G. CASTOLDI<br />

Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche e Terapie Avanzate.<br />

Sezione di Ematologia. Università di Ferrara, Via Savonarola,<br />

9 – 44100 Ferrara, Italy<br />

Introduction<br />

A number of recurrent chromosome translocations<br />

have been detected in lymphoid neoplasias, well characterized<br />

by molecular genetic studies, highlighting<br />

fundamental mechanisms of neoplastic transformation.<br />

Some translocations showed an association<br />

with specific clinicopathologic types: with few exceptions,<br />

the t(14;18) is a diagnostic feature of follicle<br />

centre cell lymphoma; the t(11;14)(q13;q32) indicates<br />

the origin of lymphoma cells from the follicle<br />

mantle, the t(8;14)(q24;q32) identifies Burkitt’s<br />

lymphoma and related disorders, the t(3;V)(q27;V)<br />

defines a genetically distinct subgroup of diffuse large<br />

cell lymphoma, the t(2;5)(p23;q35) and the related<br />

NPM/ALK fusion protein is the hallmark of<br />

CD30+ anaplastic large cell lymphoma.<br />

A growing body of evidence has accumulated over<br />

the last 10 years suggesting that so-called “secondary”<br />

chromosome changes play an important role<br />

in determining the clinical phenotype in lymphoid tumors<br />

1-3 . Additional chromosome changes were<br />

shown to consist mostly of unbalanced rearrangements,<br />

leading to DNA gain or loss, and the cytogenetic<br />

profile of each form of lymphoma was found to<br />

vary according to the primary anomaly defining the<br />

stemline. Thus, while trisomy 7 and trisomy 12 occurred<br />

at a relatively high incidence in non-Hodgkin’s<br />

lymphoma (NHL) of follicle centre cell lineage carrying<br />

the t(14;18), monosomy 13, –Y, 6q– were listed<br />

among the most frequent aberrations occurring in<br />

addition to the 11;14 translocation in MCL.<br />

The development of molecular cytogenetic techniques,<br />

i.e. fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)<br />

and comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) allowed<br />

for a more definite assessment of the cytogentic<br />

profile of NHL.<br />

The significance of primary and secondary chromosome<br />

lesions in follicle centre cell lymphoma<br />

(FCCL) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) are summarized<br />

in this report, with reference to the correlation<br />

with clinicopathological features.<br />

Follicle centre cell lymphoma (FCCL)<br />

FCCL accounts for as many as 40 % of all NHL in<br />

western countries.<br />

This lymphoid tumor consists of a proliferation of<br />

centrocytes/centroblasts unable to progress through<br />

the germinal centre, harbouring somatic hypermutation<br />

of the IgV genes and ongoing mutations (antigen<br />

driven stimulation). The immunophenotype is<br />

typically pan-B+; CD10+/–; CD5–; sIg+. The primary<br />

chromosomal aberration is the t(14;18)(q32,q21)<br />

fusing the Ig heavy chain gene and the BCL2 gene.<br />

This chromosomal rearrangement can be detected<br />

in 70-80 % of the cases by conventional cytogenetic<br />

analysis, by southern blotting and by FISH.<br />

In most studies evidence was provided that this<br />

chromosomal rearrangement does not have an impact<br />

on prognosis 1,4 . A study found a correlation<br />

between prognosis and the breakpoint location in<br />

the BCL2 region, with a 95 %, 76 % and 57 %<br />

three-year failure free survival in those cases with<br />

mbr, MBR and germline BCL2 configuration, respectively<br />

5 .

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!