Portada Simposios - Supplements - Haematologica
Portada Simposios - Supplements - Haematologica Portada Simposios - Supplements - Haematologica
128 Haematologica (ed. esp.), volumen 85, supl. 2, octubre 2000 A B Figure 3. A) PCR strategy for detection of intron 22 inversion. Recombination between F8A gene located inside intron 22 of FVIII gene and either of two distal telomeric homologous genes (F8A’ and F8A˝) results in distinguishable PCR products sizes. B) Agarose gel electrophoresis of PCR products amplified from 8 inversion-negative individuals, 2 inversion-positive patients and a carrier woman. M: size marker. Laboratory techniques for the genetic diagnosis of hemophilia The molecular diagnosis of hemophilia has been achieved by a number of techniques that are continuously improved with better knowledge of the responsible genes. In severe hemophilia A, the routine protocol begins with characterization of the most frequent mutation (intron 22 inversion) by means of Southern Blot, a tedious and time-consuming technique that commonly requires the use of radioactive isotopes. However, recent description of a simple, single-tube PCR technique allows determination of the intron 22 gene inversion in patients and carriers in less time and at lower cost (fig. 3). Moreover, when applied to prenatal diagnosis, using amniofiltrated fluid of 11 weeks’ gestation, we found this technique to be highly sensitive and reliable. If the inversion is ruled out, the genetic study can be performed in several ways depending on the laboratory facilities, human resources and the diagnostic accuracy required. Techniques for the molecular diagnosis of Hemophilia A and B can be classified into three groups according to the degree of sensitivity and simplicity, and the information provided: 1. Linkage analysis techniques: these are indirect techniques based on the peculiarity that a number of polymorphic markers are present along the human genome. These markers, which can be intragenic or extragenic, allow identification and follow-up of the chromosome that carries the gene with the genetic defect, though they are not related with the pathology. Intragenic polymorphisms are most suitable for diagnosis since the probability of recombination between the marker and the gene defect is lower. The polymorphic markers used in the linkage analysis of hemophilia include the Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (RFLP), when the presence or absence of a restriction site is analyzed, or Short Tandem Repeats (STR), comprised of short sequences repeated in a variable number, with a characteristic pattern for
XLII Reunión Nacional de la AEHH y XVI Congreso de la SETH. Simposios 129 Figure 4. Schematic representation of our direct-sequencing procedure for molecular diagnosis of hemophilia. each individual. STR markers are commonly more informative, since they are multi-allelic and thus the heterozygosity in the population is higher. 2. Mutation screening techniques: This group includes several methods that allow, on a physical or chemical basis, the differentiation between a control amplified DNA fragment and an identical fragment carrying a mutation. Many screening techniques have been designed and used for molecular diagnosis of hemophilia, such as Single Strand Conformational Polymorphism (SSCP), Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis (DGGE), Conformational Sensitive Gel Electrophoresis (CSGE), Amplification and Mismatch Detection (AMD), Universal Heteroduplex Generator (UHG), etc. In all cases the first step is identification of the fragment carrying the mutation, which often involves two or more candidates. Further DNA sequencing of these fragments must be performed to confirm the presence of a mutation and to determine if it is responsible for the pathology. 3. Direct DNA sequencing: This is conceptually the simplest approach since the gene associated to the pathology is analyzed by determining the nucleotide sequence. This methodology analyzes the regulatory elements and sequences coding for all functional protein domains. Because of the significant recent advances in DNA sequencing technology, direct sequencing of genes is increasing as the preferred technique for the molecular diagnosis of a number of hereditary diseases. Optimized nucleotide sequencing in hemophilia diagnosis One of the main goals in our laboratory was the design and implementation of a new protocol for rapid, reliable and sensitive molecular diagnosis of Hemophilia A and B, based on accurate identification of the mutations responsible for these bleeding disorders. Because of the high mutational variability associated with both genes, it was essential to develop a relatively simple and cost-effective procedure with minimal hands-on time so that all the essential regions of the gene could be studied efficiently. For this purpose, we modified several previously described protocols and designed new primers that amplify a collection of fragments covering all gene essential regions (23 amplimers for factor VIII and 7 for factor IX) under identical thermocycling parameters. The complete procedure from blood sample collection to mutation identification in hemophilia A, including analysis of the intron 22 inversion, can be done in less than 4 days. For hemophilia B, we have been able to sequence the promoter, all exons and the corresponding flanking intronic regions in less than 15 hours thanks to the smaller size of the FIX gene (fig. 4). We obtained similar results
- Page 75 and 76: XLII Reunión Nacional de la AEHH y
- Page 77 and 78: XLII Reunión Nacional de la AEHH y
- Page 79 and 80: XLII Reunión Nacional de la AEHH y
- Page 81 and 82: XLII Reunión Nacional de la AEHH y
- Page 83 and 84: XLII Reunión Nacional de la AEHH y
- Page 85 and 86: XLII Reunión Nacional de la AEHH y
- Page 87 and 88: XLII Reunión Nacional de la AEHH y
- Page 89 and 90: XLII Reunión Nacional de la AEHH y
- Page 91 and 92: XLII Reunión Nacional de la AEHH y
- Page 93 and 94: XLII Reunión Nacional de la AEHH y
- Page 95 and 96: XLII Reunión Nacional de la AEHH y
- Page 97 and 98: XLII Reunión Nacional de la AEHH y
- Page 99 and 100: XLII Reunión Nacional de la AEHH y
- Page 101 and 102: XLII Reunión Nacional de la AEHH y
- Page 103 and 104: XLII Reunión Nacional de la AEHH y
- Page 105 and 106: XLII Reunión Nacional de la AEHH y
- Page 107 and 108: XLII Reunión Nacional de la AEHH y
- Page 109 and 110: XLII Reunión Nacional de la AEHH y
- Page 111 and 112: XLII Reunión Nacional de la AEHH y
- Page 113 and 114: XLII Reunión Nacional de la AEHH y
- Page 115 and 116: XLII Reunión Nacional de la AEHH y
- Page 117 and 118: XLII Reunión Nacional de la AEHH y
- Page 119 and 120: XLII Reunión Nacional de la AEHH y
- Page 121 and 122: XLII Reunión Nacional de la AEHH y
- Page 123 and 124: XLII Reunión Nacional de la AEHH y
- Page 125: XLII Reunión Nacional de la AEHH y
- Page 129 and 130: XLII Reunión Nacional de la AEHH y
- Page 131 and 132: XLII Reunión Nacional de la AEHH y
- Page 133 and 134: XLII Reunión Nacional de la AEHH y
- Page 135 and 136: XLII Reunión Nacional de la AEHH y
- Page 137 and 138: XLII Reunión Nacional de la AEHH y
- Page 139 and 140: XLII Reunión Nacional de la AEHH y
- Page 141 and 142: XLII Reunión Nacional de la AEHH y
- Page 143 and 144: XLII Reunión Nacional de la AEHH y
- Page 145 and 146: XLII Reunión Nacional de la AEHH y
- Page 147 and 148: XLII Reunión Nacional de la AEHH y
- Page 149 and 150: XLII Reunión Nacional de la AEHH y
- Page 151 and 152: XLII Reunión Nacional de la AEHH y
- Page 153 and 154: ESTADO ACTUAL DEL DIAGNÓSTICO Y TR
- Page 155 and 156: XLII Reunión Nacional de la AEHH y
- Page 157 and 158: XLII Reunión Nacional de la AEHH y
- Page 159 and 160: XLII Reunión Nacional de la AEHH y
- Page 161 and 162: XLII Reunión Nacional de la AEHH y
- Page 163 and 164: XLII Reunión Nacional de la AEHH y
- Page 165 and 166: XLII Reunión Nacional de la AEHH y
- Page 167 and 168: XLII Reunión Nacional de la AEHH y
- Page 169 and 170: BANCO DE SANGRE: SEGURIDAD EN DONAC
- Page 171 and 172: XLII Reunión Nacional de la AEHH y
- Page 173 and 174: XLII Reunión Nacional de la AEHH y
- Page 175 and 176: XLII Reunión Nacional de la AEHH y
XLII Reunión Nacional de la AEHH y XVI Congreso de la SETH. <strong>Simposios</strong><br />
129<br />
Figure 4. Schematic representation of our direct-sequencing procedure for molecular diagnosis of hemophilia.<br />
each individual. STR markers are commonly more informative,<br />
since they are multi-allelic and thus the heterozygosity<br />
in the population is higher.<br />
2. Mutation screening techniques: This group includes<br />
several methods that allow, on a physical or<br />
chemical basis, the differentiation between a control<br />
amplified DNA fragment and an identical fragment<br />
carrying a mutation. Many screening techniques<br />
have been designed and used for molecular diagnosis<br />
of hemophilia, such as Single Strand Conformational<br />
Polymorphism (SSCP), Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis<br />
(DGGE), Conformational Sensitive Gel Electrophoresis<br />
(CSGE), Amplification and Mismatch Detection<br />
(AMD), Universal Heteroduplex Generator (UHG), etc.<br />
In all cases the first step is identification of the fragment<br />
carrying the mutation, which often involves<br />
two or more candidates. Further DNA sequencing of<br />
these fragments must be performed to confirm the<br />
presence of a mutation and to determine if it is responsible<br />
for the pathology.<br />
3. Direct DNA sequencing: This is conceptually<br />
the simplest approach since the gene associated to<br />
the pathology is analyzed by determining the nucleotide<br />
sequence. This methodology analyzes the regulatory<br />
elements and sequences coding for all functional<br />
protein domains. Because of the significant<br />
recent advances in DNA sequencing technology, direct<br />
sequencing of genes is increasing as the preferred<br />
technique for the molecular diagnosis of a number<br />
of hereditary diseases.<br />
Optimized nucleotide sequencing<br />
in hemophilia diagnosis<br />
One of the main goals in our laboratory was the<br />
design and implementation of a new protocol for rapid,<br />
reliable and sensitive molecular diagnosis of Hemophilia<br />
A and B, based on accurate identification<br />
of the mutations responsible for these bleeding disorders.<br />
Because of the high mutational variability<br />
associated with both genes, it was essential to develop<br />
a relatively simple and cost-effective procedure<br />
with minimal hands-on time so that all the essential<br />
regions of the gene could be studied efficiently. For<br />
this purpose, we modified several previously described<br />
protocols and designed new primers that amplify<br />
a collection of fragments covering all gene essential<br />
regions (23 amplimers for factor VIII and<br />
7 for factor IX) under identical thermocycling parameters.<br />
The complete procedure from blood sample<br />
collection to mutation identification in hemophilia<br />
A, including analysis of the intron 22 inversion,<br />
can be done in less than 4 days. For hemophilia B,<br />
we have been able to sequence the promoter, all<br />
exons and the corresponding flanking intronic regions<br />
in less than 15 hours thanks to the smaller size<br />
of the FIX gene (fig. 4). We obtained similar results