EL MUNDO hOy. GESTIÓN DE LA DIVERSIDAD. UN IMPERATIVO ...

EL MUNDO hOy. GESTIÓN DE LA DIVERSIDAD. UN IMPERATIVO ... EL MUNDO hOy. GESTIÓN DE LA DIVERSIDAD. UN IMPERATIVO ...

upcomillas.es
from upcomillas.es More from this publisher
27.11.2014 Views

The Assessment of Intercultural Training Efficacy... The overall findings indicate that intentional intercultural training is useful for expatriates and particularly important for employees who are on their first sojourn away from home. These employees moved from a place of polarization of «us» and «them» to an acknowledgement of the similarities they have with those who formerly represented «other». Such significant findings for this group of employees provide crucial information for company and administrators of expatriation and international relocation departments. 6.2. Implications for training The implications of this research for training are many. It is important to acknowledge that some of the learning objectives critical for trainees go beyond the cognitive content. The data from this study suggest that if intercultural effectiveness —expressed as a growth in Plasticity— is a goal of training, we need to do much more than offer cognitive training (language and conversation training). We need to add intercultural effectiveness as a learning outcome for trainees in the process of expatriation and develop a parallel training method to incorporate opportunities for such learning. Bennett (2008) argues that intercultural learning is more transferable than traditional models of cross cultural study. Cultural comparative training focuses on contact with other cultures and cultural knowledge or content as the desired outcome, while intercultural learning emphasizes a dynamic process toward the communication of meaning. Bennett and Paige (personal communication, October 24, 2008) define intercultural training as the «systematic effort to foster intercultural learning through training design.» The implications of the research discussed in this article point toward the importance of intercultural training for expatriation. The intentional intervention described in this study includes what Goldstein (1993) refers to as the pedagogy of change, and involved a training design intent on fostering intercultural learning. It is unclear whether the intercultural training alone facilitates the changes found in the intentional intervention group (Group 1) or if it was the intercultural training plus the six months on-going expatriation experience. Yet control conditions make it clear that intercultural training with the six months on-going expatriation experience was a statistically significant 219

INTERNAcionaLIZACIÓN Y CAPITAL HUMANO factor. The themes for trainers elucidated in the findings of this focus on the importance of the combination of «just in time» learning with « just in case» guided facilitation and reflection alongside the use of intercultural training and the balance of challenge and support. 7. Limitations and recommendations for further research In this case study, the training evaluation revealed the fact that NEO FFI and Plasticity thematically overlap in the connotations of cultural competences, such as cultural knowledge, awareness and sensitivity. However, other aspects such as communication skills and relationship building have received relatively limited attention (Guthrie, 1996). Future research and researchers who intend to assess training and development of cultural competence can take these dimensions into consideration and explore the possible implications of the results of the measure, i.e. how the training and expatriation time contribute to a better cultural adjustment, also in the case of relocation. Moreover and because of NEO PI-R cross-cultural validity (Mc- Crae, Costa, del Pilar, Rolland & Parker, 1998), this measure assumes that culture involves a matter of ethnicity (Kumas-Tan et all, 2007). Therefore, based on the assumption of cultural competence, that different culture should be taken into account and perceived during the measurement, the assessment design should also show a concern not only for ethnicity in cross-cultural context but also for organizational culture and how it shapes human behavior and relations inside the organization (Shein,1995). Finally, the Five Factor Model of NEO PI-R is a personality test in the form of a self-reported instrument, which is subject to the problem of socially desirable responding, though McCrae & Costa (2004) claimed that correlations between social desirability and its five scales showed no statistical significance. Face-to-face interviews is one of the solutions to alleviate the problem of social desirability (Krosnick, 1990). Nevertheless and for future research, one should not reject the assignment of the NEO FFI appliance in the pre-test phase but complementing, controlling and confirming its results in the pre- test phase with a more cross-cultural oriented assessment instrument, i.e. Learning Style Inventory (Kolb, 1993, 1999). As a pre and post test the Intercultural 220

INTERNAcionaLIZACIÓN Y CAPITAL HUMANO<br />

factor. The themes for trainers elucidated in the findings of this focus on<br />

the importance of the combination of «just in time» learning with « just<br />

in case» guided facilitation and reflection alongside the use of intercultural<br />

training and the balance of challenge and support.<br />

7. Limitations and recommendations for further research<br />

In this case study, the training evaluation revealed the fact that<br />

NEO FFI and Plasticity thematically overlap in the connotations of<br />

cultural competences, such as cultural knowledge, awareness and sensitivity.<br />

However, other aspects such as communication skills and relationship<br />

building have received relatively limited attention (Guthrie,<br />

1996). Future research and researchers who intend to assess training<br />

and development of cultural competence can take these dimensions<br />

into consideration and explore the possible implications of the results<br />

of the measure, i.e. how the training and expatriation time contribute to<br />

a better cultural adjustment, also in the case of relocation.<br />

Moreover and because of NEO PI-R cross-cultural validity (Mc-<br />

Crae, Costa, del Pilar, Rolland & Parker, 1998), this measure assumes<br />

that culture involves a matter of ethnicity (Kumas-Tan et all, 2007).<br />

Therefore, based on the assumption of cultural competence, that different<br />

culture should be taken into account and perceived during the<br />

measurement, the assessment design should also show a concern not<br />

only for ethnicity in cross-cultural context but also for organizational<br />

culture and how it shapes human behavior and relations inside the organization<br />

(Shein,1995).<br />

Finally, the Five Factor Model of NEO PI-R is a personality test<br />

in the form of a self-reported instrument, which is subject to the problem<br />

of socially desirable responding, though McCrae & Costa (2004)<br />

claimed that correlations between social desirability and its five scales<br />

showed no statistical significance. Face-to-face interviews is one of the<br />

solutions to alleviate the problem of social desirability (Krosnick, 1990).<br />

Nevertheless and for future research, one should not reject the assignment<br />

of the NEO FFI appliance in the pre-test phase but complementing,<br />

controlling and confirming its results in the pre- test phase with a<br />

more cross-cultural oriented assessment instrument, i.e. Learning Style<br />

Inventory (Kolb, 1993, 1999). As a pre and post test the Intercultural<br />

220

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!