EL MUNDO hOy. GESTIÃN DE LA DIVERSIDAD. UN IMPERATIVO ...
EL MUNDO hOy. GESTIÃN DE LA DIVERSIDAD. UN IMPERATIVO ... EL MUNDO hOy. GESTIÃN DE LA DIVERSIDAD. UN IMPERATIVO ...
The Assessment of Intercultural Training Efficacy... The overall findings indicate that intentional intercultural training is useful for expatriates and particularly important for employees who are on their first sojourn away from home. These employees moved from a place of polarization of «us» and «them» to an acknowledgement of the similarities they have with those who formerly represented «other». Such significant findings for this group of employees provide crucial information for company and administrators of expatriation and international relocation departments. 6.2. Implications for training The implications of this research for training are many. It is important to acknowledge that some of the learning objectives critical for trainees go beyond the cognitive content. The data from this study suggest that if intercultural effectiveness —expressed as a growth in Plasticity— is a goal of training, we need to do much more than offer cognitive training (language and conversation training). We need to add intercultural effectiveness as a learning outcome for trainees in the process of expatriation and develop a parallel training method to incorporate opportunities for such learning. Bennett (2008) argues that intercultural learning is more transferable than traditional models of cross cultural study. Cultural comparative training focuses on contact with other cultures and cultural knowledge or content as the desired outcome, while intercultural learning emphasizes a dynamic process toward the communication of meaning. Bennett and Paige (personal communication, October 24, 2008) define intercultural training as the «systematic effort to foster intercultural learning through training design.» The implications of the research discussed in this article point toward the importance of intercultural training for expatriation. The intentional intervention described in this study includes what Goldstein (1993) refers to as the pedagogy of change, and involved a training design intent on fostering intercultural learning. It is unclear whether the intercultural training alone facilitates the changes found in the intentional intervention group (Group 1) or if it was the intercultural training plus the six months on-going expatriation experience. Yet control conditions make it clear that intercultural training with the six months on-going expatriation experience was a statistically significant 219
INTERNAcionaLIZACIÓN Y CAPITAL HUMANO factor. The themes for trainers elucidated in the findings of this focus on the importance of the combination of «just in time» learning with « just in case» guided facilitation and reflection alongside the use of intercultural training and the balance of challenge and support. 7. Limitations and recommendations for further research In this case study, the training evaluation revealed the fact that NEO FFI and Plasticity thematically overlap in the connotations of cultural competences, such as cultural knowledge, awareness and sensitivity. However, other aspects such as communication skills and relationship building have received relatively limited attention (Guthrie, 1996). Future research and researchers who intend to assess training and development of cultural competence can take these dimensions into consideration and explore the possible implications of the results of the measure, i.e. how the training and expatriation time contribute to a better cultural adjustment, also in the case of relocation. Moreover and because of NEO PI-R cross-cultural validity (Mc- Crae, Costa, del Pilar, Rolland & Parker, 1998), this measure assumes that culture involves a matter of ethnicity (Kumas-Tan et all, 2007). Therefore, based on the assumption of cultural competence, that different culture should be taken into account and perceived during the measurement, the assessment design should also show a concern not only for ethnicity in cross-cultural context but also for organizational culture and how it shapes human behavior and relations inside the organization (Shein,1995). Finally, the Five Factor Model of NEO PI-R is a personality test in the form of a self-reported instrument, which is subject to the problem of socially desirable responding, though McCrae & Costa (2004) claimed that correlations between social desirability and its five scales showed no statistical significance. Face-to-face interviews is one of the solutions to alleviate the problem of social desirability (Krosnick, 1990). Nevertheless and for future research, one should not reject the assignment of the NEO FFI appliance in the pre-test phase but complementing, controlling and confirming its results in the pre- test phase with a more cross-cultural oriented assessment instrument, i.e. Learning Style Inventory (Kolb, 1993, 1999). As a pre and post test the Intercultural 220
- Page 169 and 170: INTERNAcionaLIZACIÓN Y CAPITAL HUM
- Page 171 and 172: INTERNAcionaLIZACIÓN Y CAPITAL HUM
- Page 173 and 174: INTERNAcionaLIZACIÓN Y CAPITAL HUM
- Page 175 and 176: INTERNAcionaLIZACIÓN Y CAPITAL HUM
- Page 177 and 178: INTERNAcionaLIZACIÓN Y CAPITAL HUM
- Page 179 and 180: INTERNAcionaLIZACIÓN Y CAPITAL HUM
- Page 181 and 182: INTERNAcionaLIZACIÓN Y CAPITAL HUM
- Page 183 and 184: INTERNAcionaLIZACIÓN Y CAPITAL HUM
- Page 185 and 186: INTERNAcionaLIZACIÓN Y CAPITAL HUM
- Page 187 and 188: INTERNAcionaLIZACIÓN Y CAPITAL HUM
- Page 189 and 190: INTERNAcionaLIZACIÓN Y CAPITAL HUM
- Page 191 and 192: INTERNAcionaLIZACIÓN Y CAPITAL HUM
- Page 193 and 194: INTERNAcionaLIZACIÓN Y CAPITAL HUM
- Page 195 and 196: INTERNAcionaLIZACIÓN Y CAPITAL HUM
- Page 197 and 198: INTERNAcionaLIZACIÓN Y CAPITAL HUM
- Page 199 and 200: INTERNAcionaLIZACIÓN Y CAPITAL HUM
- Page 201 and 202: INTERNAcionaLIZACIÓN Y CAPITAL HUM
- Page 203 and 204: INTERNAcionaLIZACIÓN Y CAPITAL HUM
- Page 205 and 206: INTERNAcionaLIZACIÓN Y CAPITAL HUM
- Page 207 and 208: INTERNAcionaLIZACIÓN Y CAPITAL HUM
- Page 209 and 210: INTERNAcionaLIZACIÓN Y CAPITAL HUM
- Page 211 and 212: INTERNAcionaLIZACIÓN Y CAPITAL HUM
- Page 213 and 214: INTERNAcionaLIZACIÓN Y CAPITAL HUM
- Page 215 and 216: Openness to experience 51.78 63.33
- Page 217 and 218: INTERNAcionaLIZACIÓN Y CAPITAL HUM
- Page 219: INTERNAcionaLIZACIÓN Y CAPITAL HUM
- Page 223 and 224: INTERNAcionaLIZACIÓN Y CAPITAL HUM
- Page 225 and 226: INTERNAcionaLIZACIÓN Y CAPITAL HUM
- Page 227 and 228: INTERNAcionaLIZACIÓN Y CAPITAL HUM
- Page 229 and 230: INTERNAcionaLIZACIÓN Y CAPITAL HUM
- Page 231 and 232: INTERNAcionaLIZACIÓN Y CAPITAL HUM
- Page 233 and 234: INTERNAcionaLIZACIÓN Y CAPITAL HUM
- Page 235 and 236: INTERNAcionaLIZACIÓN Y CAPITAL HUM
- Page 237 and 238: INTERNAcionaLIZACIÓN Y CAPITAL HUM
- Page 239 and 240: INTERNAcionaLIZACIÓN Y CAPITAL HUM
- Page 241 and 242: INTERNAcionaLIZACIÓN Y CAPITAL HUM
- Page 243 and 244: INTERNAcionaLIZACIÓN Y CAPITAL HUM
- Page 245 and 246: INTERNAcionaLIZACIÓN Y CAPITAL HUM
- Page 247 and 248: INTERNAcionaLIZACIÓN Y CAPITAL HUM
- Page 249 and 250: INTERNAcionaLIZACIÓN Y CAPITAL HUM
- Page 251 and 252: INTERNAcionaLIZACIÓN Y CAPITAL HUM
- Page 253 and 254: INTERNAcionaLIZACIÓN Y CAPITAL HUM
- Page 256 and 257: ¿Internacionalización o no? Influ
- Page 258 and 259: ¿Internacionalización o no? Influ
- Page 260 and 261: ¿Internacionalización o no? Influ
- Page 262 and 263: ¿Internacionalización o no? Influ
- Page 264 and 265: ¿Internacionalización o no? Influ
- Page 266 and 267: ¿Internacionalización o no? Influ
- Page 268 and 269: ¿Internacionalización o no? Influ
INTERNAcionaLIZACIÓN Y CAPITAL HUMANO<br />
factor. The themes for trainers elucidated in the findings of this focus on<br />
the importance of the combination of «just in time» learning with « just<br />
in case» guided facilitation and reflection alongside the use of intercultural<br />
training and the balance of challenge and support.<br />
7. Limitations and recommendations for further research<br />
In this case study, the training evaluation revealed the fact that<br />
NEO FFI and Plasticity thematically overlap in the connotations of<br />
cultural competences, such as cultural knowledge, awareness and sensitivity.<br />
However, other aspects such as communication skills and relationship<br />
building have received relatively limited attention (Guthrie,<br />
1996). Future research and researchers who intend to assess training<br />
and development of cultural competence can take these dimensions<br />
into consideration and explore the possible implications of the results<br />
of the measure, i.e. how the training and expatriation time contribute to<br />
a better cultural adjustment, also in the case of relocation.<br />
Moreover and because of NEO PI-R cross-cultural validity (Mc-<br />
Crae, Costa, del Pilar, Rolland & Parker, 1998), this measure assumes<br />
that culture involves a matter of ethnicity (Kumas-Tan et all, 2007).<br />
Therefore, based on the assumption of cultural competence, that different<br />
culture should be taken into account and perceived during the<br />
measurement, the assessment design should also show a concern not<br />
only for ethnicity in cross-cultural context but also for organizational<br />
culture and how it shapes human behavior and relations inside the organization<br />
(Shein,1995).<br />
Finally, the Five Factor Model of NEO PI-R is a personality test<br />
in the form of a self-reported instrument, which is subject to the problem<br />
of socially desirable responding, though McCrae & Costa (2004)<br />
claimed that correlations between social desirability and its five scales<br />
showed no statistical significance. Face-to-face interviews is one of the<br />
solutions to alleviate the problem of social desirability (Krosnick, 1990).<br />
Nevertheless and for future research, one should not reject the assignment<br />
of the NEO FFI appliance in the pre-test phase but complementing,<br />
controlling and confirming its results in the pre- test phase with a<br />
more cross-cultural oriented assessment instrument, i.e. Learning Style<br />
Inventory (Kolb, 1993, 1999). As a pre and post test the Intercultural<br />
220