EL MUNDO hOy. GESTIÓN DE LA DIVERSIDAD. UN IMPERATIVO ...

INTERNAcionaLIZACIÓN Y CAPITAL HUMANO
Table 1.
Table 1: NEO FFI and its facets
NEO FFI and its facets
Cross-cultural stability of an instrument can be considered as an evidence of its validity.
Huge Cross-cultural amount of cross-cultural stability research of an has been instrument carried out can on the be Five-Factor considered Model as an
evidence of personality of by its utilizing validity. the Huge NEO-PI-R amount and the shorter of cross-cultural version, the NEO-FFI. research McCrae has been
carried and Allik out (2002) on have the presented Five-Factor a collection Model of selected of personality invited papers by from utilizing various the
NEO-PI-R researchers across and globe the covering shorter various version, issues the in cross-cultural NEO-FFI. research McCrae on the and Five Allik
(2002) Factor Model have (FFM). presented This volume a collection has also presented of selected data about invited the FFM papers from several from various
cultures. researchers The robustness across of the globe FFM has covering been proved various across issues different in cultures, cross-cultural for
research example, Chinese on the (McCrae, Five Factor Costa, & Model Yik, 1996; (FFM). Yik & This Bond, volume 1993), Estonian has also & presented
Finnish (Pulver,
data about
Allik, Pulkkinen,
the FFM
&
from
Hämäläinen,
several
1995),
cultures.
Filipino
The
and French
robustness
(McCrae,
of the
FFM has been proved across different cultures, for example, Chinese
Costa, del Pilar, Rolland, & Parker, 1998), India (Lodhi, Deo, & Belhekar, 2002),
(McCrae, Costa, & Yik, 1996; Yik & Bond, 1993), Estonian & Finnish
Portuguese (Lima, 2002), Russian (Martin, Oryol, Rukavishnikov, & Senin, 2000),
(Pulver, Allik, Pulkkinen, & Hämäläinen, 1995), Filipino and French
South Korean (Piedmont & Chae, 1997), Turkish (Gülgöz, 2002), Vietnamese
(McCrae, Costa, del Pilar, Rolland, & Parker, 1998), India (Lodhi, Deo,
(Leininger, 2002), sub-Saharan cultures like Zimbabwe (Piedmont, Bain, McCrae, &
& Belhekar, 2002), Portuguese (Lima, 2002), Russian (Martin, Oryol,
Costa, 2002), etc. Angleitner and Ostendorf (2000) presented the evidence for
Rukavishnikov, & Senin, 2000), South Korean (Piedmont & Chae,
robustness of the FFM in German speaking countries like Austria, former East and West
1997), Turkish (Gülgöz, 2002), Vietnamese (Leininger, 2002), sub-
Germany, and Switzerland. Rolland (2000), on the basis of the data from sixteen
Saharan cultures like Zimbabwe (Piedmont, Bain, McCrae, & Costa,
cultures, asserted that the neuroticism, openness, and conscientiousness dimensions are
2002), etc. Angleitner and Ostendorf (2000) presented the evidence for
cross-culturally valid. Rolland further states that extraversion and agreeableness
robustness of the FFM in German speaking countries like Austria, former
East and West Germany, and 4 Switzerland. Rolland (2000), on the
basis of the data from sixteen cultures, asserted that the neuroticism,
openness, and conscientiousness dimensions are cross-culturally valid.
206