Aca - Departamento de Física - Universidad Técnica Federico Santa ...
Aca - Departamento de Física - Universidad Técnica Federico Santa ... Aca - Departamento de Física - Universidad Técnica Federico Santa ...
V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisiones Inelásticas en la Materia 64 Valparaíso, Chile
V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisiones Inelásticas en la Materia Electron emission by grazing scattering from Be(0001) C. D. Archubi 1 , M. S. Gravielle 1,2 and V. M. Silkin 3,4 1 Instituto de Astronomía y Física del Espacio, CONICET-UBA, Buenos Aires, Argentina 2 Depto. de Física, Fac. de C. Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina 3 Donostia Internacional Physics Center (DIPC), 20018, San Sebastián, Spain 4 IKERBASQUE, Basque Foundation for Science, 48011 Bilbao, Spain email address corresponding author: archubi@iafe.uba.ar 1. INTRODUCTION Recently it has been demonstrated that occupied surface states can modify the dielectric properties of metal surfaces [1]. Thus, with the aim of investigating the influence of surface states on electron emission, we study electron distributions originated by fast protons colliding grazing with a Be(0001) surface. Beryllium presents a technological interest in modern fusion reactors and it is expected that its surface states play an important role in inelastic electronic processes. To describe the electron emission process we employ the Band-structure-based (BSB) model [2], which includes an accurate description of the electron-surface potential, incorporating information about the band structure of the solid. Within the BSB approach the surface interaction is described by a realistic onedimensional model potential [3], while the dynamic response of the medium is derived in consistent way from the unperturbed electronic states by using a linear response theory. This method has been succesfully employed to study energy loss and electron emission from Al surfaces, where the effects of the surface states were found negligible [4]. 2. RESULTS Due to the large mass of the projectile, it is reasonable to calculate its motion in terms of a classical trajectory. Within the binary collisional formalism, the transition probability per unit path reads dP 2 π ( x) = δ ( ∆) T dk vs if 2 (1) where z is the projectile distance to the surface, v s is the projectile velocity parallel to the surface plane, and the Dirac delta expresses the energy conservation. In Eq (1) T if represents the T-matrix element, which is evaluated within a first-order-perturbation theory. In this work we employ the BSB model to derive both the unperturbed electronic wave functions and the surface induced potential. The differential probability of electron transition to a given final state with momentum k , is dP dk , obtained from Eq (1) by integrating along the classical projectile trajectory, after adding the contributions coming from the different initial states. 10 1 10 0 10 -1 dP/dk (a.u.) dP/dk (a.u.) 10 -2 10 -3 10 -4 10 1 10 0 10 -1 10 -2 10 -3 10 -4 100 100 keV keV H + H + Be Be (0001) α = 1 α = 1 ο ο 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 Energy (eV) Energy (eV) θ=20 ο θ=20 ο θ=30 ο θ=30 ο θ=45 ο θ=45 ο θ=30 ο Jellium Figure 1. Differential probability of electron emission from the valence band, as a function of the electron energy, for 100 keV protons impinging on a Be (0001) surface with the angle α=1 o . Three different electron emission angles, meassured with respect to the surface plane, are considered: θ =20, 30 and 45 o . 65 Valparaíso, Chile
- Page 14 and 15: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 16 and 17: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 18 and 19: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 20 and 21: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 22 and 23: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 24 and 25: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 26 and 27: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 28 and 29: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 30 and 31: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 32 and 33: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 34 and 35: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 36 and 37: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 38 and 39: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 40 and 41: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 42 and 43: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 44 and 45: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 46 and 47: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 48 and 49: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 50 and 51: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 52 and 53: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 54 and 55: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 56 and 57: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 58 and 59: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 60 and 61: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 62 and 63: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 66 and 67: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 68 and 69: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 70 and 71: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 72 and 73: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 74 and 75: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 76 and 77: Counts V Encuentro Sud Americano de
- Page 78 and 79: Py (a.u.) V Encuentro Sud Americano
- Page 80 and 81: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 82 and 83: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 84 and 85: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 86 and 87: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 88 and 89: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 90 and 91: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 92 and 93: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 94 and 95: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 96 and 97: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 98 and 99: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 100 and 101: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 102 and 103: Intensidade Intensidade V Encuentro
- Page 104 and 105: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 106 and 107: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 108 and 109: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 110: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
V Encuentro Sud Americano <strong>de</strong> Colisiones Inelásticas en la Materia<br />
Electron emission by grazing scattering from Be(0001)<br />
C. D. Archubi 1 , M. S. Gravielle 1,2 and V. M. Silkin 3,4<br />
1 Instituto <strong>de</strong> Astronomía y <strong>Física</strong> <strong>de</strong>l Espacio, CONICET-UBA, Buenos Aires, Argentina<br />
2 Depto. <strong>de</strong> <strong>Física</strong>, Fac. <strong>de</strong> C. Exactas y Naturales, <strong>Universidad</strong> <strong>de</strong> Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina<br />
3 Donostia Internacional Physics Center (DIPC), 20018, San Sebastián, Spain<br />
4 IKERBASQUE, Basque Foundation for Science, 48011 Bilbao, Spain<br />
email address corresponding author: archubi@iafe.uba.ar<br />
1. INTRODUCTION<br />
Recently it has been <strong>de</strong>monstrated that<br />
occupied surface states can modify the dielectric<br />
properties of metal surfaces [1]. Thus, with the<br />
aim of investigating the influence of surface<br />
states on electron emission, we study electron<br />
distributions originated by fast protons colliding<br />
grazing with a Be(0001) surface. Beryllium presents<br />
a technological interest in mo<strong>de</strong>rn fusion<br />
reactors and it is expected that its surface states<br />
play an important role in inelastic electronic<br />
processes.<br />
To <strong>de</strong>scribe the electron emission process<br />
we employ the Band-structure-based (BSB)<br />
mo<strong>de</strong>l [2], which inclu<strong>de</strong>s an accurate <strong>de</strong>scription<br />
of the electron-surface potential, incorporating<br />
information about the band structure of the<br />
solid. Within the BSB approach the surface interaction<br />
is <strong>de</strong>scribed by a realistic onedimensional<br />
mo<strong>de</strong>l potential [3], while the dynamic<br />
response of the medium is <strong>de</strong>rived in consistent<br />
way from the unperturbed electronic<br />
states by using a linear response theory. This<br />
method has been succesfully employed to study<br />
energy loss and electron emission from Al surfaces,<br />
where the effects of the surface states<br />
were found negligible [4].<br />
2. RESULTS<br />
Due to the large mass of the projectile, it<br />
is reasonable to calculate its motion in terms of a<br />
classical trajectory. Within the binary collisional<br />
formalism, the transition probability per unit<br />
path reads<br />
dP 2 π<br />
( x)<br />
= δ ( ∆)<br />
T<br />
dk vs<br />
if<br />
2<br />
(1)<br />
where z is the projectile distance to the surface,<br />
v s is the projectile velocity parallel to the surface<br />
plane, and the Dirac <strong>de</strong>lta expresses the<br />
energy conservation. In Eq (1) T if represents the<br />
T-matrix element, which is evaluated within a<br />
first-or<strong>de</strong>r-perturbation theory.<br />
In this work we employ the BSB mo<strong>de</strong>l<br />
to <strong>de</strong>rive both the unperturbed electronic wave<br />
functions and the surface induced potential. The<br />
differential probability of electron transition to a<br />
<br />
given final state with momentum k , is dP dk<br />
, obtained<br />
from Eq (1) by integrating along the classical<br />
projectile trajectory, after adding the contributions<br />
coming from the different initial<br />
states.<br />
10 1<br />
10 0<br />
10 -1<br />
dP/dk (a.u.)<br />
dP/dk (a.u.)<br />
10 -2<br />
10 -3<br />
10 -4<br />
10 1<br />
10 0<br />
10 -1<br />
10 -2<br />
10 -3<br />
10 -4<br />
100 100 keV keV H + H + Be Be (0001)<br />
α = 1<br />
α = 1 ο ο<br />
30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240<br />
30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240<br />
Energy (eV)<br />
Energy (eV)<br />
θ=20 ο<br />
θ=20 ο<br />
θ=30 ο<br />
θ=30 ο<br />
θ=45 ο<br />
θ=45 ο<br />
θ=30 ο Jellium<br />
Figure 1. Differential probability of electron emission<br />
from the valence band, as a function of the electron<br />
energy, for 100 keV protons impinging on a Be<br />
(0001) surface with the angle α=1 o . Three different<br />
electron emission angles, meassured with respect to<br />
the surface plane, are consi<strong>de</strong>red: θ =20, 30 and 45<br />
o .<br />
65 Valparaíso, Chile