Aca - Departamento de Física - Universidad Técnica Federico Santa ...
Aca - Departamento de Física - Universidad Técnica Federico Santa ... Aca - Departamento de Física - Universidad Técnica Federico Santa ...
V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisiones Inelásticas en la Materia Secondary Ions emission from Alkanethiol-SAMs due to highly charged ions bombardment M Flores 1 , V. Esaulov 2 and Y. Yamazaki 3 1 Depto. de Física, Facultad de ciencias físicas y matemáticas, Universidad de Chile, casilla 110-V, Santiago, Chile. 2 Laboratoire des Collisions Atomiques et Moleculaires, Universite Paris-Sud, Orsay Cedex, France. 3 Atomic Physics Laboratory, Riken Institute, Wako, Saitama, Japan. email address corresponding author: mflorescarra@ing.uchile.cl Self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) are ordered molecular assemblies formed by the adsorption of an active surfactant on a solid surface. SAMs provide a convenient, flexible, and simple system with which to tailor the interfacial properties of metal, metal oxides and semiconductors [1]. The alkanethiols are a common type of molecules used to build SAMs. Several techniques have been used to study and characterize SAMs, for example SPM, optical and ion spectroscopies. In the latter case, the interaction of ions with SAM surfaces leads to the sputtering of molecules from the surface, with the detection of such molecules giving information on both the chemical and structural composition of the SAM. For this reason much experimental and theoretical effort has been directed towards ion-SAM collisions. Special case is the highly charged ions (HCI). For slow HCI, the potential energy stored in the projectile can far exceed its kinetic energy. In contrast to the kinetic sputtering process, which is due to momentum transfer from the ion to the surface, HCI may also transfer significant potential energy, removing ions and molecules from the surface in a process called potential sputtering. SAMs of the alkanethiol molecules Undecanethiol (UDT), HS(CH 2 ) 10 CH 3 , and Dodecanethiol (DDT), HS(CH 2 ) 11 CH 3 , were prepared on atomically flat Au(111) which was deposited as a thin film on freshly cleaved mica. The quality of the SAMs was confirmed by STM observations [2]. The samples were bombardment with Ar q+ ions. The q-dependence of the proton sputtering yield from hydrogen contaminated/covered surfaces has been found to follow a power law dependence and this was explained by the classical over barrier model. In this model a HCI approaching an atom/molecule induces multielectron transfer. In the case of our SAM it would induce electron transfer from the alkanethiol molecule terminal functional group. Removal of two electrons from the most external part of the SAM, would create a doubly charged chemical bond (C-H) 2+ . Because the molecule is a poor conductor, the reneutralization probability in the molecular layer should be lower than on a metal, and a proton may be released in the bond direction by Coulomb repulsion [3]. In general, in the above model the proton yield is then dependent on the probabilities of removal of the first and second electron and on reneutralization as the ion moves away from the surface, given a power law, Fig 1(a,b), and in the case under study the probabilities are strong dependent of the orientation of the terminal functional group, Fig. 1(c,d). Figure 1. Proton Yields from (a)UDT and (b)DDT under bombardment with Ar q+ ions. Top surface scheme of the SAMs corresponding to (c)UDT and (d)DDT. References [1] Love et al, Chem. Rev. 105 (2005) 1103. [2] O’Rourke et al, Appl. Phys. Lett., submitted. [3] Flores et al, Phys. Rev. A79 (2009) 022902. 54 Valparaíso, Chile
V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisiones Inelásticas en la Materia Structural characterization of Pb nanoislands in SiO 2 /Si interface synthesized by ion implantation through MEIS analysis D. F. Sanchez 1 , F. P. Luce 2 , Z. E. Fabrim 1 , M. A. Sortica 1 , P. F. P. Fichtner 1 and P. L. Grande 1 1 Institute of Physics, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil email address corresponding author: dario.f.sanchez@gmail.com Recently, the Medium Energy Ion Scattering (MEIS) technique has been used as an additional tool for characterization of nanoparticles (NPs), where basically their shape, composition, size distribution, stoichiometry and the determination of depth distributions of different elements in a single NP have been successfully obtained. We have developed a Monte Carlo simulation and fitting software, the PowerMeis [1], that considers any geometry, size distribution, density of the nanostructures and also the asymmetry of the energy loss-distribution. In this work we investigate buried Pb NPs synthesized by ion implantation on SiO 2 /Si thin film, with low temperature and long aging time treatments followed by a high temperature thermal annealing. This process [2] leads to the formation of a dense 2D NPs array located at the SiO 2 /Si interface, as shown in Fig. 1. Through the 2D MEIS spectra (energy and angle), we have studied the nanostructure geometry, number density and mean NP size of such system. The present results are compared to transmission electron microscopy (TEM) measurements. Figure 1. (a) HRTEM micrograph from a [011] oriented sample presenting a cross-section view of the NPs partially embedded in the Si matrix; (b) Brightfield two-beam image, underfocus, demonstrating that the NPs are exclusively located at the SiO 2 /Si (100) interface. (c) Plan-view image (bright field, in focus) close to the (001) zone axis, showing square based NPs preferentially aligned parallel to the (011) planes of the matrix. In Fig. 2 is compared the experimental MEIS spectra to the simulation performed by the PowerMeis software using the NP geometrical shape described in Fig. 3 and number density of 3.5×10 11 cm -2 , close to 55 Valparaíso, Chile
- Page 4 and 5: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 6 and 7: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 8 and 9: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 10 and 11: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 12 and 13: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 14 and 15: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 16 and 17: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 18 and 19: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 20 and 21: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 22 and 23: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 24 and 25: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 26 and 27: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 28 and 29: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 30 and 31: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 32 and 33: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 34 and 35: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 36 and 37: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 38 and 39: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 40 and 41: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 42 and 43: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 44 and 45: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 46 and 47: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 48 and 49: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 50 and 51: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 52 and 53: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 56 and 57: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 58 and 59: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 60 and 61: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 62 and 63: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 64 and 65: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 66 and 67: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 68 and 69: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 70 and 71: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 72 and 73: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 74 and 75: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 76 and 77: Counts V Encuentro Sud Americano de
- Page 78 and 79: Py (a.u.) V Encuentro Sud Americano
- Page 80 and 81: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 82 and 83: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 84 and 85: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 86 and 87: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 88 and 89: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 90 and 91: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 92 and 93: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 94 and 95: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 96 and 97: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 98 and 99: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 100 and 101: V Encuentro Sud Americano de Colisi
- Page 102 and 103: Intensidade Intensidade V Encuentro
V Encuentro Sud Americano <strong>de</strong> Colisiones Inelásticas en la Materia<br />
Structural characterization of Pb nanoislands in SiO 2 /Si interface synthesized<br />
by ion implantation through MEIS analysis<br />
D. F. Sanchez 1 , F. P. Luce 2 , Z. E. Fabrim 1 , M. A. Sortica 1 , P. F. P. Fichtner 1 and P. L.<br />
Gran<strong>de</strong> 1<br />
1 Institute of Physics, Universida<strong>de</strong> Fe<strong>de</strong>ral do Rio Gran<strong>de</strong> do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil<br />
email address corresponding author: dario.f.sanchez@gmail.com<br />
Recently, the Medium Energy Ion Scattering<br />
(MEIS) technique has been used as an<br />
additional tool for characterization of<br />
nanoparticles (NPs), where basically their<br />
shape, composition, size distribution,<br />
stoichiometry and the <strong>de</strong>termination of <strong>de</strong>pth<br />
distributions of different elements in a single<br />
NP have been successfully obtained. We have<br />
<strong>de</strong>veloped a Monte Carlo simulation and fitting<br />
software, the PowerMeis [1], that consi<strong>de</strong>rs<br />
any geometry, size distribution, <strong>de</strong>nsity<br />
of the nanostructures and also the asymmetry<br />
of the energy loss-distribution. In this<br />
work we investigate buried Pb NPs synthesized<br />
by ion implantation on SiO 2 /Si thin<br />
film, with low temperature and long aging<br />
time treatments followed by a high temperature<br />
thermal annealing. This process [2] leads<br />
to the formation of a <strong>de</strong>nse 2D NPs array located<br />
at the SiO 2 /Si interface, as shown in<br />
Fig. 1. Through the 2D MEIS spectra (energy<br />
and angle), we have studied the nanostructure<br />
geometry, number <strong>de</strong>nsity and mean NP size<br />
of such system. The present results are compared<br />
to transmission electron microscopy<br />
(TEM) measurements.<br />
Figure 1. (a) HRTEM micrograph from a [011] oriented<br />
sample presenting a cross-section view of the<br />
NPs partially embed<strong>de</strong>d in the Si matrix; (b) Brightfield<br />
two-beam image, un<strong>de</strong>rfocus, <strong>de</strong>monstrating<br />
that the NPs are exclusively located at the SiO 2 /Si<br />
(100) interface. (c) Plan-view image (bright field, in<br />
focus) close to the (001) zone axis, showing square<br />
based NPs preferentially aligned parallel to the (011)<br />
planes of the matrix.<br />
In Fig. 2 is compared the experimental<br />
MEIS spectra to the simulation performed by<br />
the PowerMeis software using the NP geometrical<br />
shape <strong>de</strong>scribed in Fig. 3 and number<br />
<strong>de</strong>nsity of 3.5×10 11 cm -2 , close to<br />
55 Valparaíso, Chile