You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
38 Hiroshi Nagata kaj Renato Corsetti<br />
Komatsu, M. 1996. An X ′ bar analysis of Esperanto. LING 602 term paper. University<br />
of Alberta.<br />
Lado, R. 1957. Linguistics across culture. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.<br />
Lakoff, R. 1977. You say what you are: Acceptability and gender-related language. En:<br />
Greenbaum, red., (1977:73 86).<br />
MacWhinney, B.; Bates, E. 1989. The crosslinguistic study of language processing. New<br />
York: Cambridge University Press.<br />
Maxwell, D. 1985. Genera modelo de Esperanto: Ĝeneralaj rimarkoj kaj specifa analizo.<br />
En: R. Ryszard, red., Acta interlingvistica: 12-a Scienca Interlingvistika Simpozio<br />
Varsovio, p. 47 56. Varsovio: Akademickie Centrum Interlingwistiyczne.<br />
Miyamoto, M. 1982. Vortaro Japana-Esperanta. Tokyo: Japana Esperanto-Instituto.<br />
Nagata, H. 1988. The relativity of linguistic intuitions: The effect of repetition on grammaticality<br />
judgments. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 17, 1 17.<br />
Nagata, H. 1989. Effects of repetition on grammaticality judgments under objective<br />
and subjective self-awareness conditions. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18,<br />
255 269.<br />
Nagata, H. 1992. Anchoring effects in judging grammaticality of sentences. Perceptual<br />
and Motor Skills, 75, 159 164.<br />
Nagata, H. 1997a. An assimilation effect in judging grammaticality of sentences violating<br />
the subjacency condition. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 84, 755 767.<br />
Nagata, H. 1997b. Anchoring effects in judging grammaticality of sentences violating<br />
the subjacency condition. Psychologia, 40, 163 171.<br />
Nagata, H. 1997c. Kernvorto-parametro en genera gramatiko: Apliko al eldiroj de<br />
infanoj denaske lernantaj Esperanton. Scienca Revuo, 48(1), 34 43.<br />
Nagata, H. 2001. Judgments of grammaticality of Japanese bitransitive sentences with<br />
a differing number of arguments. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 92, 993 1001.<br />
Nagata, H.; Bain, B. 2000. Judgments of grammaticality of sentences with a differing<br />
number of arguments: A comparison of English and Japanese speakers. Perceptual<br />
and Motor Skills, 91, 503 511.<br />
Newmeyer, F. J. 1983. Grammatical theory: Its limits and its possibilities. Chicago, IL: The<br />
University of Chicago Press.<br />
van Oostendorp, M. 1991. The syntax of a language without grammar. MA Thesis, Tilburg<br />
University.<br />
Otsuka, T.; Nakajima, F., red., 1982. The Kenkyusha Dictionary of English Linguistics and<br />
Philology. Tokyo: Kenkyusha.<br />
Pienemann, M. 1989. Is language teachable? Applied Linguistics, 10, 52 79.<br />
Radford, A. 1997 Syntactic theory and the structure of English: A minimalist approach.<br />
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.<br />
Ritchie, W. C.; Bhatia, T. K. red., 1996. Handbook of second language acquisition. San<br />
Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Change language