2010 apuntes sobre modelación de nichos ecológicos - Instituto de ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Apuntes sobre modelación de nichos ecológicos Table 4 (Ejemplo). Test of niche equivalency and niche similarity. Results of tests are followed by an assessment of statistical significance (p ≤ 0.05 = *; p ≤ 0.01 = **; p > 0.05 = ns). The statistical significance in the Backround similarity test from the measured overlap between species pair is given as the first species listed in the column predicting the second and the second species predicting the first. Species Pair Identity test concolor - d. coahuilensis concolor - d. duranguensis concolor- religiosa concolor - guatemalensis concolor- hickelli concolor - flincklii concolor - mexicana d. coahuilensis - d. duranguensis d. coahuilensis - religiosa d. coahuilensis - guatemalensis d. coahuilensis - hickelli d. coahuilensis - flincklii d. coahuilensis - mexicana d. duranguensis - religiosa d. duranguensis - guatemalensis d. duranguensis - hickelli d. duranguensis - flincklii (niche equivalency) Background test (niche similarity) I D I D 0.517 ** 0.288 ** 0.517 ns ns 0.288 ns ns 0.409 ** 0.094 ** 0.409 ns ** 0.094 * ** 0.310 ** 0.011 ** 0.310 ns ** 0.011 ns ** 0.329 ** 0.030 ** 0.329 * ** 0.030 ns ** 0.304 ** 0.007 ** 0.304 ** ** 0.007 ** ** 0.306 ** 0.008 ** 0.306 ** ** 0.008 ** ** 0.406 ** 0.143 ** 0.406 ns ** 0.143 ns ** 0.450 ** 0.159 ** 0.450 ns * 0.159 ns * 0.400 ** 0.120 ** 0.400 ** ns 0.120 ** ns 0.497 ** 0.251 ** 0.497 ns ns 0.251 ns ns 0.391 ** 0.116 ** 0.391 ** ns 0.116 ** ns 0.436 ** 0.168 ** 0.436 ** ns 0.168 ** ns 0.535 ns 0.295 Laboratorio de Evolución Molecular y Experimental 64 ** 0.535 ns ns 0.295 ns ns 0.456 ** 0.177 ** 0.456 ** ns 0.177 ** ns 0.500 ** 0.253 ** 0.500 ns ns 0.253 ns ns 0.424 ** 0.149 ** 0.424 ** ns 0.149 ** ns 0.550 ** 0.293 ** 0.550 ns ns 0.293 ns ns
Apuntes sobre modelación de nichos ecológicos Literatura citada y recomendada Graham, C. H., Ron, S. R., Juan, C., Schneider, C. J. y Moritz, C. (2004). ''Integrating phylogenetics and environmental niche models to explore speciation mechanisms in dendrobatid frogs. Evolution 58(8): 1781-1793. Harmon, J. E. y S. J. Anderson. 2003. The Design and Implementation of Geographic Information System, Editorial: John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey. Losos, J.B. (2008). Phylogenetic niche conservatism, phylogeneticsignal and the relationship between phylogenetic relatedness and ecological similarity among species. Ecol. Lett., 11, 995–1003. Peterson, A. T., J. Soberón, y V. Sánchez-Cordero. 1999. Conservatism of ecological niches in evolutionary time. Science 285:1265–1267. Phillips, S. J. y Dudík, M. 2008. Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. _ Ecography 31: 161_175. Phillips, S. J. et al. 2006. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. _ Ecol. Model. 190: 231_259. Soberón, J. y M. Nakamura. 2009. Niches and distributional areas: Concepts, methods,and assumptions. PNAS, 17: 19644-19650. Warren, D. L., R. E. Glor y M. Turelli. 2008. Environmental niche equivalency versus conservatism: Quantitative aproches to niche evolution. Evolution 62: 2868- 2883. Laboratorio de Evolución Molecular y Experimental 65
Page 1 and 2:
2010 Laboratorio de Evolución Mole
Page 3 and 4:
Apuntes sobre modelación de nichos
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14: Apuntes sobre modelación de nichos
Page 63: Apuntes sobre modelación de nichos
show all

2010 apuntes sobre modelación de nichos ecológicos - Instituto de ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?