11.05.2013 Views

Richard Serra - Literal

Richard Serra - Literal

Richard Serra - Literal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

For thirty-odd years I dedicated myself to collecting and one night, I found myself at dinner with these<br />

two guys. I told them what I was gathering and they offered to help me and I thought, well, maybe they<br />

really mean it, right? One was the city mayor, Andrés Manuel López Obrador,<br />

and the other a businessman, Carlos Slim.<br />

para el museo era una mezcla de alta cultura y cultura<br />

popular, no para contraponerlas, sino para mostrar<br />

cómo van integradas dentro de un gusto popular, pues<br />

el aprecio a lo que a uno lo rodea es lo que descubre<br />

su calidad artística.<br />

r<br />

24 4 L ITERAL. LATIN AMERICAN VOICES • FALL, 2007<br />

Carlos Slim. Both of them came to an agreement, and<br />

they helped me with the museum project. López Obrador<br />

gave us a magnifi cent site, a neoclassical building,<br />

and Slim gave us the profi ts from a record store he<br />

owns to help us pay the salaries of museum employees.<br />

That was our starting point. This alternative curatorial<br />

concept really works, as demonstrated by the fact that<br />

“El Estanquillo” was inaugurated four months ago and<br />

already 65,000 people have visited it, which is quite a<br />

lot for Mexico City. And “El Estanquillo” isn’t the only<br />

museum in this regard, there’s a museum of Economic<br />

History that is doing extraordinarily well; there’s a place<br />

called Indianilla Station for new, postmodern art that<br />

is also working optimally, which demonstrates that<br />

there’s a public for this sort of less traditional museum.<br />

However, the museum par excellence in Mexico City<br />

continues to be the Museum of Anthropology because<br />

it founded an idea, slanted if you will, on a historic<br />

trend of tradition and national patrimony. The next<br />

museum in order of importance is Frida Kahlo’s, due<br />

to any explanation you prefer: she’s a great painter, a<br />

woman who suffered, of feminist attitudes. The third<br />

in terms of visitors is the National Museum of Art, and<br />

then comes us, which is really saying something. The<br />

fact is that between the Museum of Anthropology, the<br />

Frida Kahlo, the National and the other museums in<br />

Mexico City there’s a historic gap; but what the example<br />

of “El Estanquillo” shows us is that there’s also<br />

room for places that young people visit. The recreation<br />

of Mexican taste at “El Estanquillo,” has caught a lot<br />

of attention. Now there are going to be ten traveling<br />

shows, because there are 15,000 pieces in storage and<br />

480 being exhibited, so the idea is to have traveling<br />

shows of José Guadalupe Posada, Miguel Covarrubias,<br />

and Diego and Frida—on a minor scale—, because<br />

basically it consists of representations of both fi gures.<br />

However, this example doesn’t speak to us about cultural<br />

policy so much as a desire to demonstrate that<br />

taste has a way of imposing itself over big budgets.<br />

Taste that requires a minimal investment because it’s<br />

popular taste, but not in the sense of being the opposite<br />

of Art with a capital “A,” given that what I proposed<br />

for the museum was a blend of high and pop<br />

culture. Not to set them at odds, but in order to show<br />

how they’re integrated within popular taste, because<br />

an appreciation for what surrounds us is what reveals<br />

its artistic quality.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!