El relojero ciego - Fieras, alimañas y sabandijas

50. LANDE, R.: «Sexual dimorphism, sexual selection, and adaptation
in polygenic characters», Evolution, 34 (1980), 292-305.
51. LANDE, R.: «Models of specialion by sexual selection of poly¬
genic traits», Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
78 (1981), 3721-3725.
52. LEIGH, E. G.: «How does selection reconcile individual ad¬
vanlage with the good of the group?», Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences, 74 (1977), 4542-4546.
53. LEWONTIN, R. C y LEVINS, R.: «The Problcm of Lysen¬
koism», en ROSE, H. y S. ROSE (eds.), The Radicalization of
Science, Londres, Macmillan, 1976.
54. MACKIE, J. L.; The Miracle of Theism, Oxford, Clarendon
Press, 1982.
55. MARGULIS, L.: Symbiosis in Cell Evolution. San Francisco,
W. H. Freeman, 1981.
56. MAYNARD SMITH, J.; «Current controversies in evolutionary
biology», en GRENE, M. (ed.), Dimensions of Darwinism, Cambridge,
Cambridge University Press, 1983, pp. 273-286.
57. MAYNARD SMITH, J.: The Prohlems of Biology, Oxford, Oxford
University Press, 1986.
58. MAYNARD SMITH, J. et al.: «Developmental constraints and
evolution», Quarterly Review of Biology, 60 (1986), 265-287.
59. MAYR, E.: Animal Species and Evolution, Cambridge, Mass.,
Harvard University Press, 1963.
60. MAYR, E.: Principies of Systematic Zoology, Nueva York,
McGraw-Hill, 1969.
61. MAYR, E.: The Growth of Biological Thought, Cambridge,
Mass., Harvard University Press, 1982.
62. MONOD, J.: Chance and Necessity, Londres, Fontana, 1972.
(Trad. esp.: El azar y la necesidad, 2. a edición, Barcelona,
Orbis, 1987.)
63. MONTEFIORE, H.: The Probability of God, Londres, SCM
Press, 1985.
64. MORRISON, P., P. MORRISON, C. EAMES y R. EAMES: Powers
of Ten, Nueva York, Scientific American, 1982. (Trad. esp.: Potencias
de diez, 2. a edición, Barcelona, Prensa Científica, 1984.)
65. NAGEL, T.: «(What is it like to be a bat?», Philosophical Review,
reimpreso en HOFSTADTER, D. R. y D. C. DENNETT
(eds.), The Mind's I, Brighton, Harvestcr Press, 1974, pp.
391-403.
66. NELKIN, D.: «The science textbook controversies», Scientific
American, 234 (4) (1976), 33-39.
67. NELSON, G. y N. I. PLATNICK: «Systematics and evolution»,
en Ho, M.-W. y P. SAUNDERS (eds.), Beyond Neo-Darwinism,
Londres, Academic Press, 1984.
68. O'DONALD, P.: «Sexual selection by female choice», en BA-
TESON, P. P. G. (ed.), Mate Choice, Cambridge, Cambridge
University Press, 1983, pp. 53-66.
69. ORGEL, L. E.: The Origins of Life, Nueva York, Wiley, 1973.
(Trad. esp.: Los orígenes de la vida, 3. a edición, Madrid, Alianza.
1984.)
70. ORGEL, L. E.: «Selection in vitro», Proceedings of the Royal
Society of London, B, 205 (1979), 435442.
71. PALEY, W.: Natural Theology, 2. a edición, Oxford, J. Vincent,
1828.
72. PENNEY, D., L. R. FOULDS y M. D. HENDY: «Testing the
theory of evolution by comparing phylogenetic trees cons¬
tructed from five different protein sequences», Nature, 191
(1982), 197-200.
73. RIDLEY, M.: «Coadaptation and the inadequacy of natural
selekoon», British Journal for the History of Science, 15 (1982),
45-68.
74. RlDLEY, M.: The Prohlems of Evolution, Oxford, Oxford University
Press, 1986. (Trad. esp.: La evolución y sus problemas,
Madrid, Pirámide, 1987.)
75. RlDLEY, M.: Evolution and Classification: the reformation of
cladism, Londres, Longman, 1986.
76. RUSE, M.: Darwinism Defended, Londres, Addison-Wesley,
1982.
77. SALES, G. y D. PYE: Ultrasonic Communication by Animals,
Londres, Chapman & Hall, 1974.
78. SIMPSON, G. G.: Splendid isolation, New Haven, Yale University
Press, 1980.
79. SINGER, P.: Animal Liberation, Londres, Cape, 1976.
80. SMITH, J. L. B.: Old Fourlegs: the story of the Coelacanth, Londres,
Longmans, Green, 1956.
81. SNEATH, P. H. A. y R. R. SOKAL: Numerical Taxonomy, San
Francisco, W. H. Freeman, 1973.
82. SPIEGELMAN, S.: «An in vitro analysis of a replicating mole¬
cule», American Scientist, 55 (1967), 63-68.
83. STEBBINS, G. L.: Darwin to DNA, Molecules to Humanity, San
Francisco, W. H. Freeman, 1982.
84. THOMPSON, S. P.: Calculus Made Easy, Londres, Macmillan,
1910.
85. TRIVERS, R. L.: Social Evolution, Menlo Park, Benjamin-
Cummings, 1985.
86. TURNER, J. R. G.: «"The hypothesis that explains mimetic
resemblance explains evolution": the gradualist-saltationist
schism», en GRENE, M. (ed.), Dimensions of Darwinism, Cambridge,
Cambridge University Press, 1983, pp. 129-169.