08.05.2013 Views

10/05/2012 - Myclipp

10/05/2012 - Myclipp

10/05/2012 - Myclipp

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Bizjournais/ - News, Sex, 11 de Maio de <strong>2012</strong><br />

CLIPPING INTERNACIONAL (Supreme Court)<br />

State board accuses Minneapolis lawyer<br />

Peter Nickitas of bullying opposing<br />

attorney<br />

Lawyers have been known to get verbally aggressive<br />

with each other in the courtroom. But a state board is<br />

saying one Minneapolis attorney went too far and<br />

wants him publicly disciplined for "harassing and<br />

bullying" another lawyer.The Office of Lawyers<br />

Professional Responsibility, which monitors attorney<br />

ethics, has asked the Minnesota Supreme Court<br />

Minnesota Supreme Court Latest from The Business<br />

Journals Ethics group: Lawyer's excessive fees<br />

depleted trust nun set up for her children and<br />

grandchildrenMinnesota Supreme Court rules against<br />

Burlington Northern in million verdictTwin Cities<br />

attorney convicted of M mortgage fraud is disbarred<br />

Follow this company to suspend Minneapolis attorney<br />

Peter James Nickitas, partially for insulting statements<br />

he allegedly made to lawyer Michelle Hurley.Nickitas<br />

said in an interview Friday that "the allegation of<br />

bullying is false."Nickitas has been in the news<br />

recently as the lawyer representing three same-sex<br />

couples seeking marriage licenses in Hennepin<br />

County. Earlier this year, the Minnesota Court of<br />

Appeals revived their challenge to a state law that bars<br />

same-sex couples from marrying.Nickitas and Hurley<br />

opposed each other in a 2009 case in which an<br />

arbitrator was asked to decide who owed who how<br />

much money in a traffic accident that damaged a taxi<br />

cab.The first time Nickitas and Hurley met in a hearing,<br />

Nickitas said as part of his presentation that "Hurley<br />

could not read and needed glasses," the ethics group<br />

said in its petition to the Supreme Court."After the<br />

arbitration hearing concluded, respondent told Hurley<br />

that he knew of a good place for her to get the glasses<br />

she needs," according to the petition.After a second<br />

hearing several months later, the petition says Nickitas<br />

made multiple threatening and insulting comments to<br />

Hurley."As Hurley was leaving the courtroom,<br />

respondent yelled at her that he hoped she "sleep(s)<br />

with the fishes," the petition said. "As Hurley was about<br />

to exit the building, respondent, who was trailing,<br />

caught up to Hurley, got in front of her and went<br />

nose-to-nose to her and began screaming at Hurley.<br />

Respondent had to be pulled away by an associate of<br />

his as a bailiff approached."<br />

72

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!