08.05.2013 Views

10/05/2012 - Myclipp

10/05/2012 - Myclipp

10/05/2012 - Myclipp

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Alabamians should see on Wednesday, the last day of<br />

the legislative session, just how badly the Republicans<br />

who control the Statehouse want to continue down the<br />

path of anti-immigrant extremism.The lawmakers’<br />

challenge was to fix last year’s terrible immigration law,<br />

House Bill 56, which turned state and local police<br />

officers into papers-checking immigration agents and<br />

imposed a grab bag of criminal punishments and<br />

deterrents on undocumented immigrants and on<br />

businesses and charitable organizations that help or<br />

hire them. The only real solution is the full repeal of the<br />

law, but bills to do that have died. Republican leaders<br />

have said they want to make the law more “efficient,”<br />

but have vowed not to weaken it. So the question as<br />

time runs out is whether the Legislature will approve<br />

any “tweaks” through a new measure, House Bill 658,<br />

that has already passed the House, or some other bill<br />

originating in the Senate. It may be that only the courts<br />

can rescue Alabama from itself. Some parts of the<br />

current law are temporarily on hold awaiting the<br />

outcome of a federal lawsuit, including the requirement<br />

that schools collect students’ immigration data and<br />

sections criminalizing “business transactions” by the<br />

undocumented and nullifying contracts they enter. But<br />

other sections are still in force, including the one<br />

directing police to check the papers of those they stop.<br />

Alabama’s Disgrace<br />

The New York Times/ - Politics, Qua, 16 de Maio de <strong>2012</strong><br />

CLIPPING INTERNACIONAL (Constitutionality.)<br />

House Bill 658 preserves the malign intent of the<br />

earlier law and makes some of its provisions worse. It<br />

expands the “papers, please” requirement to target<br />

passengers in a stopped car as well as the driver. It<br />

doubles, to 48 hours, the time someone can be jailed<br />

while awaiting an immigration check. It increases jail<br />

time and fines for newly created — and surely<br />

unconstitutional — state immigration crimes. It does<br />

nothing meaningful to shield from prosecution those<br />

who “harbor” or “transport” immigrants for religious or<br />

humanitarian reasons. As for the expense of litigation,<br />

the harm to public safety as crime victims avoid the<br />

police, and the misery inflicted on the working poor —<br />

all of those ill-effects seem quite intact. The Supreme<br />

Court recently heard oral arguments on the<br />

constitutionality of Arizona’s immigration law, whose<br />

noxious spirit and letter Alabama has copied. A ruling<br />

in that case is expected in June, and could unleash<br />

more Arizona-style damage in other states.<br />

Meanwhile, the two Republican architects of<br />

Alabama’s immigration law, Micky Hammon in the<br />

House and Scott Beason in the Senate, are pressing<br />

on. And The Associated Press reported this month that<br />

Alabama farmers are planting less and shifting to<br />

mechanized crops as the reality of an immigrant labor<br />

shortage — the high price of xenophobia — sinks in.<br />

358

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!