08.05.2013 Views

10/05/2012 - Myclipp

10/05/2012 - Myclipp

10/05/2012 - Myclipp

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

El País/ - Sociedad, Dom, 13 de Maio de <strong>2012</strong><br />

CLIPPING INTERNACIONAL (Supreme Court)<br />

Weekend-jaunt judge under scrutiny<br />

When, in 2008, Prime Minister José Luis Rodríguez<br />

Zapatero appointed Carlos Dívar to head the General<br />

Council of the Judiciary (CGPJ) legal watchdog - a<br />

position that automatically includes the post of<br />

Supreme Court chief justice - there were a lot of<br />

grumblings on the bench.Dívar was practically an<br />

unknown. The Málaga-born judge wasn"t recognized<br />

for any important decisions; he had never issued a<br />

written opinion. Serving seven years as chief judge on<br />

the national High Court, he had never been on any<br />

multi-judge panel that ruled on high-profile cases -<br />

another important requisite for anyone named to<br />

preside over the Supreme Court. His role was more<br />

that of an administrative judge.The other justices on<br />

the Supreme Court were upset by Zapatero"s<br />

decision because they felt that the appointment should<br />

have been made from within. So it comes as no<br />

surprise that no other bench member rushed to his<br />

defense this week when a fellow CGPJ member filed a<br />

complaint against Dívar with Attorney General<br />

Eduardo Torres-Dulce for alleged misuse of public<br />

funds.Dívar was first accused of charging 5,658 euros<br />

to the judiciary to pay for six long weekend getaways<br />

in Marbella between September 20<strong>10</strong> and November<br />

2011. A complaint filed by José Manuel Gómez<br />

Benítez, a CGPJ member, alleges that none of the<br />

four-day trips were for official business.Then on<br />

Thursday, Gómez Benítez expanded his complaint<br />

when he discovered 14 other trips Dívar took from<br />

2008 until March of this year, with a grand total of<br />

18,654 euros charged to the judiciary.Dívar stayed in a<br />

luxurious hotel in Puerto Banús, and charged<br />

expensive dinners for two to the judiciary"s coffers, the<br />

complaint states. Even though he took the AVE<br />

high-speed train, riding in business class, the judiciary<br />

had to pay for lodgings and meals for his bodyguards,<br />

and also dispatched official vehicles to Marbella for his<br />

use.In a radio interview on Wednesday, the chief<br />

justice denied that he misused his expense account,<br />

explaining that there was a difference between<br />

personal expenses, which he says he paid out of his<br />

own pocket, and official expenses, "which are perfectly<br />

documented and justified," and were submitted to a<br />

government accountant for review. He called the<br />

5,658-euro amount in question "chicken<br />

feed."Nevertheless, the Attorney General"s Office said<br />

that it would make a decision by next week whether to<br />

file charges against Dívar with the Supreme Court,<br />

which by law has the power to investigate and try him.<br />

The entire affair has cast a bad light on one of the<br />

nation"s top judicial officers, who considers himself<br />

upright and deeply religious.The 70-year-old chief<br />

justice didn"t have any enemies before coming to the<br />

Supreme Court bench. After studying law in Deusto<br />

and Valladolid, he served as a judge in Castuera<br />

(Badajoz) and Orgaz (Toledo) and was later appointed<br />

to the High Court, where he served for 28 years<br />

investigating organized crime and terrorism. But<br />

journalists who have covered the court for three<br />

decades say that Dívar"s work never produced any big<br />

news.But in 2009, he finally made headlines when he<br />

broke a historic deadlock among the members of the<br />

CGPJ over Zapatero"s proposed abortion bill by voting<br />

against it. Sources at the CGPJ at the time said that it<br />

was Dívar"s religious convictions that prompted him to<br />

cast his vote against the relaxation of the law<br />

submitted by the government. One of the most<br />

controversial points was to allow 16-year-old girls<br />

access to the procedure without having to obtain the<br />

consent of their parents. The bill was redrafted by the<br />

executive.A lifelong bachelor, Dívar doesn"t belong to<br />

any professional associations but engages in activities<br />

where he can express his strong Catholic convictions.<br />

He makes trips to the Holy Land, often returning with<br />

wooden rosaries for his co-workers.Like many who<br />

have served on the High Court, Dívar was on terrorist<br />

group ETA"s list of targets. Some years ago, on May<br />

13, an ETA commando unit placed a car bomb along<br />

one of the two routes Dívar usually took to get to the<br />

High Court in Madrid. But that day he went a different<br />

way, and the bomb was discovered and deactivated<br />

before it went off.The judge has since attributed this<br />

failure of this attempt on his life to a miracle performed<br />

by the Virgin of Fatima, because it was her feast on<br />

the day of the incident - a parallel interpretation given<br />

by Pope John Paul II after the pontiff barely survived<br />

an assassin"s bullet on the virgin"s feast day in<br />

1981.Dívar has given religious conferences at the<br />

Madrid Archdiocese concerning how to be a good<br />

Christian while leading a public life. In a paper posted<br />

on the Brotherhood of the Valley of the Fallen"s<br />

website entitled "Justice and John Paul II," the judge<br />

touches on such themes as divine justice, God"s law,<br />

judicial independence, matrimony, family and<br />

abortion.In the end he writes: "You will find the only<br />

true justice by solely loving God and letting him love<br />

you while leading a coherent and upright life."<br />

177

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!