Guía de Práctica Clínica sobre la atención al parto normal
Guía de Práctica Clínica sobre la atención al parto normal
Guía de Práctica Clínica sobre la atención al parto normal
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
97. Andrews V, Sultan AH, Thakar R, Jones PW. Risk factors for obstetric an<strong>al</strong><br />
sphincter injury: a prospective study. Birth 2006; 2006;33(2):117-22.<br />
98. Dandolu V, Gaughan JP, Chatwani AJ, et <strong>al</strong>. Risk of recurrence of an<strong>al</strong> sphincter<br />
<strong>la</strong>cerations. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105(4):831-5.<br />
99. Harkin R, Fitzpatrick M, O’Connell PR, et <strong>al</strong>. An<strong>al</strong> sphincter disruption at<br />
vagin<strong>al</strong> <strong>de</strong>livery: Is recurrence predictable? European Journ<strong>al</strong> of Obstetrics,<br />
Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 2003;109(2):149-52.<br />
100. Sang<strong>al</strong>li MR, Floris L, F<strong>al</strong>tin D, et <strong>al</strong>. An<strong>al</strong> incontinence in women with third<br />
or fourth <strong>de</strong>gree perine<strong>al</strong> tears and subsequent vagin<strong>al</strong> <strong>de</strong>liveries. Aust N Z J<br />
Obstet Gynaecol 2000;40(3):244-8.<br />
101. Fleming VE, Hagen S, Niven C. Does perine<strong>al</strong> suturing make a difference?<br />
The SUNS tri<strong>al</strong>. BJOG 2003;110(7):684-9.<br />
102. Kettle C, James DC. Continuous versus interrupted sutures for perine<strong>al</strong> repair.<br />
(Cochrane Review). In: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 1,<br />
2006 Oxford: Update Software 2006.<br />
103. Gordon B, Mackrodt C, Fern E, Truesd<strong>al</strong>e A, Ayers S, Grant A. The Ipswich<br />
Childbirth Study: 1. A randomised ev<strong>al</strong>uation of two stage postpartum perine<strong>al</strong><br />
repair leaving the skin unsutured. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998;105:435-40.<br />
104. Kettle C, Hills RK, Jones P, Darby L, Gray R, Johanson R. Continuous versus<br />
interrupted perine<strong>al</strong> repair with standard or rapidly absorbed sutures after<br />
spontaneous vagin<strong>al</strong> birth: a randomised controlled tri<strong>al</strong>. Lancet<br />
2002;359():(9325):2217-23.<br />
105. Oboro VO, Tabowei TO, Loto OM, Bosah JO. A multicentre ev<strong>al</strong>uation of<br />
the two-<strong>la</strong>yered repair of postpartum perine<strong>al</strong> trauma. J Obstet Gynaecol<br />
2003;23(1):5-8.<br />
106. Grant A, Gordon B, Mackrodat C, Fern E, Truesd<strong>al</strong>e A, Ayers S. The Ipswich<br />
childbirth study: one year follow up of <strong>al</strong>ternative methods used in perine<strong>al</strong><br />
repair. BJOG 2001;108(1):34-40.<br />
107. Kettle C, Hills RK, Ismail KMK. Suturas continuas versus interrumpidas para<br />
<strong>la</strong> reparación <strong>de</strong> <strong>la</strong> episiotomía o los <strong>de</strong>sgarros <strong>de</strong> segundo grado (Revisión<br />
Cochrane traducida). En: La Biblioteca Cochrane Plus, 2008 Número 1 OxfORd:<br />
Update Software Ltd Disponible en: http://www.update-software.com (Traducida<br />
<strong>de</strong> The Cochrane Library, 2008 Issue 1 Chichester, UK: John Wiley &<br />
Sons, Ltd ) 2008.<br />
108. Kindberg S, Stehouwer M, Hvidman L, Henriksen TB. Postpartum perine<strong>al</strong><br />
repair performed by midwives: a randomised tri<strong>al</strong> comparing two suture techniques<br />
leaving the skin unsutured. BJOG 2008;115(4):472-9.<br />
109. Kettle C, Johanson RB. Absorbable synthetic versus catgut suture materi<strong>al</strong> for<br />
perine<strong>al</strong> repair.(Cochrane Reiew). In: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews,<br />
Issue 1, 2006;Oxford: Update Software.<br />
158<br />
GUÍAS DE PRÁCTICA CLÍNICA EN EL SNS
Change language