25.03.2013 Views

jkdKx

jkdKx

jkdKx

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

eports under the name of another oftheir U.S. experts, Dr. Charles Calm bacher, that<br />

contradicted his conclusions that he had found no evidence of harm.<br />

110. In 2004, the conspirators selected Dr. Calmbacher to be the expert in charge of<br />

their inspection and to act as the Lago Agrio Plaintiffs' testifying expert for four ofthe sites that<br />

were being inspected.<br />

111. Shortly after Dr. Calmbacher began his work in the field, Donziger informed<br />

him and the other members of the technical team that "[t]he goal is to win the legal case, not to<br />

produce an independent scientific report." Much to the RICO Defendants' dismay,<br />

Dr. Calmbacher did not abide by this admonition when he informed the RICO Defendants and<br />

their co-conspirators that, in his professional opinion, the sites he inspected did not require<br />

further remediation and did not pose a risk to human health or the environment. This, of course,<br />

was not what the RICO Defendants and their co-conspirators wanted to hear. Indeed,Donziger<br />

had instructed Dr. Calmbacher to find contamination during his site inspections.<br />

112. Dr. Calmbacher was uneasy with Donziger's instructions and the level of control<br />

the RICO Defendants tried to exert over his work. He was concerned regarding the methods and<br />

scope of analysis that the RICO Defendants and their co-conspirators planned to perform on the<br />

samples they collected. In his opinion, the analysis was insufficient to test all the aspects ofthe<br />

oil that he felt should be tested. When Dr. Calmbacher informed Donziger of his concerns,<br />

however, Donziger brushed them aside and decided to proceed with the limited and inadequate<br />

analysis he already had planned.<br />

113. When it became clear that Dr. Calmbacher's conclusions were unsatisfactory to<br />

the RICO Defendants and their co-conspirators, they submitted to the Lago Agrio Court judicial<br />

inspection samples bearing the name "Selva Viva Laboratory" on the chain of custody forms.<br />

But there is no Selva Viva Laboratory; rather, the "analysis" was performed-if it was<br />

performed at all-in the RICO Defendants' and their co-conspirators' team hotel room, and they<br />

borrowed the name "Selva Viva"-the same name as the RICO Defendant who was "created"<br />

"simply as a pass thru mechanism to administer funds for the litigation" in Ecuador-to lend<br />

47

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!