25.03.2013 Views

jkdKx

jkdKx

jkdKx

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

jurisdiction of the Municipality." The parties also expressly agreed that "pursuant to Article<br />

2386 [current Article 2362] of the Civil Code, this settlement shall have for the parties the effect<br />

of res judicata before the highest court." Each settlement agreement represented that the<br />

municipal government had consulted "with the entities and organizations representing the<br />

community of its inhabitants" in order to choose an appropriate reparation project. According to<br />

sworn statements of the relevant government officials, each agreement met "the interests of The<br />

Community and of its citizens as to any claims they may have against TEXPET." All of these<br />

settlements were "approve[ d] ... in full" by Ecuadorian courts because they "d[id] not violate<br />

any legal provision" and "cover[ed] all issues described in the [municipality] complaint[s]."<br />

53. In addition to the national and municipal governments, two Provinces also<br />

settled their potential claims against TexPet in the name of their residents and of the ecosystems<br />

within their respective territories. In 1996, the provincial government of Sucumbfos conferred<br />

"with entities and organizations representing the community of its inhabitants" in order to select<br />

an acceptable reparation project and avoid a potential lawsuit with TexPet. It ultimately<br />

demanded, "according to the interests of the community," that TexPet fund "social interest<br />

works," viz., "provincial eco-production projects." A Consortium of Municipal Mayors in the<br />

Napo Province also endorsed a settlement contract that identified their potential disputes with<br />

TexPet relating to "the oil concession," and, especially, to "the impact or damages possibly<br />

caused to the environment." Like its counterparts in Sucumbfos and at the national level, it<br />

negotiated and settled with TexPet in order to safeguard environmental and communal<br />

entitlements. These agreements with the municipalities and provinces shall be referred to herein<br />

collectively as the "1996 Municipality Releases."<br />

54. Pursuant to the terms of the 1995 Settlement Agreement with Ecuador, TexPet<br />

selected Woodward-Clyde, one of the largest environmental engineering firms in the world at the<br />

time, from a list provided by Ecuador of acceptable contractors to perform the remediation.<br />

Woodward-Clyde conducted additional investigations of the well sites listed in the Scope of<br />

Work and developed a Remedial Action Plan, which identified the specific pits at each well site<br />

26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!