25.03.2013 Views

jkdKx

jkdKx

jkdKx

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

that the Lago Agrio Plaintiffs who signed the powers of attorney in November 2010 "affirmed<br />

that as lead counsel I have the authority to make and sign contracts, hire and retain legal<br />

consultants, and designate to others all or part of my power to represent the [Lago Agrio]<br />

Plaintiffs." He also stated that he retained several u.s. law firms to assist with the representation<br />

of the Lago Agrio Plaintiffs, including Patton Boggs, Emery Celli, and Motley Rice.<br />

22. Whether or not the individual Lago Agrio Plaintiffs were or are aware of the<br />

fraud that has been perpetrated by the RICO Defendants and their co-conspirators in their names,<br />

the Lago Agrio Plaintiffs cannot benefit from the fraud and corrupt acts perpetrated ostensibly on<br />

their behalf.<br />

SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION AND VENUE<br />

23. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over Chevron's claims under<br />

28 U.S.c. §§ 1331 and 1332, and under 18 U.S.C. § 1964(c). Chevron's first claim for relief<br />

arises under 18 U .S.c. § 1961 et seq., as hereinafter more fully appears. There is also complete<br />

diversity of citizenship between the parties, and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000,<br />

exclusive of interest and costs. Chevron's state law claims arise out of the same case or<br />

controversy as its federal law claims, as all claims in this action arise out of a common nucleus<br />

of operative facts. Thus, this Court also has supplemental jurisdiction over Chevron's state law<br />

claims under 28 U.S.C. § 1367.<br />

24. Venue is proper in this District under 28 U.S.c. § 1391 (b)(2), as a substantial<br />

number of the events giving rise to this action occurred in this District, and also under 18 U.S.C.<br />

§ 1965.<br />

PERSONAL JURISDICTION<br />

25. Exercise of jurisdiction over Defendant Donziger is reasonable and proper in this<br />

District because Donziger is a citizen of the State of New York and because he conducts<br />

extensive business activities within the State. Donziger is the sole proprietor ofthe Law Offices<br />

of Steven R. Donziger, which is located and does business in New York. Through his activities<br />

in New York, Donziger has served as the ringleader in the enterprise to defraud and extort<br />

13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!