23.03.2013 Views

jjR0b

jjR0b

jjR0b

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

39. TexPet's total profits over the life of the consortium were a small fraction of<br />

those realized by Ecuador-less than US$500 million.<br />

40. Since Petroecuador took over operational control in 1990, it has drilled 414 new<br />

wells-almost 30% more than were drilled during TexPet's 25 years as the operator-and,<br />

according to Ecuadorian public media sources, was responsible for more than 1,400 disclosed<br />

spills from 2000 to 2008 alone. Petroecuador's environmental record has prompted Ecuador's<br />

current President, Rafael Correa to comment that Petroecuador "has dreadful environmental<br />

management practices."<br />

41. Defendant Fajardo-before he realized that such candor might undercut the<br />

conspiracy's attempts to extort Chevron-also spoke out against Petroecuador's environmental<br />

record:<br />

[Petroecuador is] unreliable because what Petro[ecuador] says is one thing and<br />

what it does is the complete opposite. Since Texaco left here, Petro[ ecuador] has<br />

inflicted more damage and many more disasters than Texaco itself. But they'd<br />

never, ever say that. So there's one spill after another; there's broken pipes,<br />

there's contamination of wetlands, of rivers, of streams in great magnitude. But<br />

since it's a state-owned company, since it's the same people involved in the laws<br />

and all, no one says a thing.<br />

42. When Petroecuador took over as operator of the consortium in 1990, TexPet<br />

consented to Ecuador's request that it collaborate with Petroecuador to conduct an environmental<br />

audit of the consortium's oil fields. TexPet insisted, however, that Petroecuador, as majority<br />

owner of the consortium, share responsibility for any necessary remediation that the audit<br />

identified in the same manner as the parties had shared all operating costs. Ecuador<br />

acknowledged that TexPet was responsible for only its 37.5% share ofthe costs of remediating<br />

the environmental impact ofthe consortium's operations, and the parties recognized that TexPet<br />

could not be held responsible for the environmental impact of oil field operations conducted after<br />

its concession rights expired in 1992.<br />

43. In 1994, Ecuador publicly rejected the preliminary findings of the independent,<br />

joint audit and threatened to bring suit against TexPet for injuries to Ecuador's environment.<br />

21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!