24.02.2013 Views

hRb7u

hRb7u

hRb7u

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

fraudulent reports," and "the fabrication of evidence." And the Southern District of New York<br />

noted that "there is more than a little evidence" that the activities of the RICO Defendants "come<br />

within the crime-fraud exception."<br />

2. Making False Statements to Deceive New York Courts in Connection<br />

With Chevron's Section 1782 Applications and Other Actions<br />

304. The RICO Defendants' and their co-conspirators' deliberate misrepresentations<br />

to federal courts have not been limited to lies about their relationship with Cabrera and the<br />

authorship of the Cabrera Report. Rather, the RICO Defendants and their co-conspirators have<br />

made, or caused to be made, a number of false statements before federal courts in New York in<br />

connection with their attempt to prevent the discovery of certain Crude outtakes in a Section<br />

1782 proceeding and in the case the Lago Agrio Plaintiffs filed, through co-conspirator Emery<br />

Celli, to stop Chevron's arbitration with Ecuador in a bilateral investment treaty proceeding.<br />

305. Before the Southern District of New York, the RICO Defendants and their co-<br />

conspirators made a series offalse statements regarding Crude and the contents of the outtakes<br />

from filming sought by Chevron pursuant to Section 1782. When Chevron discovered evidence<br />

that a scene in Crude had been modified at the RICO Defendants' request in order to suppress<br />

evidence of meetings between the RICO Defendants and Cabrera team member Carlos Beristain,<br />

the RICO Defendants told the court that the meeting was "innocuous" and "of no relevance to<br />

anything." Similarly, on appeal of the district court's order requiring production of the Crude<br />

outtakes, the RICO Defendants and their co-conspirators claimed that they had requested<br />

Berlinger to delete the scene from the DVD version of the film only to "avoid the misimpression,<br />

cynically tostered by Chevron below, that [the Lago Agrio] plaintiffs participated in one of Dr.<br />

Beristain's focus groups after he was a court expert" (emphasis in original). In fact, however,<br />

the meeting from which Beristain was carefully edited out of the picture was a meeting arranged<br />

and funded by the RICO Defendants and their co-conspirators as part of their scheme to control<br />

the content of the Cabrera Report. Nor was that the only evidence of wrongdoing that disclosure<br />

of the video would record. And the attorney who signed the brief in the Second Circuit, I1ann<br />

121

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!