24.02.2013 Views

hRb7u

hRb7u

hRb7u

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

RICO Defendants and their co-conspirators actually wrote the Cabrera Report, that would have<br />

"bother[ ed]" him and affected his expert opinions.<br />

195. Similarly, another "new" expert, Dr. Lawrence Barnthouse, relied on the<br />

standards contained in the Cabrera Report, and "assume[d] [Cabrera] was correctly<br />

characterizing what they were." Indeed, he has admitted that he was not retained to create a new,<br />

independent report, and further acknowledged that he "couldn't be completely independent" and<br />

he had not "independently performed all the [necessary] calculations" in his own report because<br />

most of the information he needed was "only available from the Cabrera Report." Like Allen,<br />

Barnthouse has admitted that he relied on the Cabrera Report despite the fact that he had reached<br />

the conclusion that Cabrera's numbers were "uncertain" and that methodology he adopted from<br />

Cabrera was an "an unreliable indicator" and was "[s]uboptimal, [and] inadequate."<br />

196. Jonathan Shefftz, another of these experts, did no independent work and<br />

repackaged portions of the fraudulent Cabrera Report. For example, Shefftz assumed without<br />

doing any independent research or analysis that TexPet was required to incur costs and to<br />

remediate pits based solely on the Cabrera Report's assertion that these costs were necessary.<br />

Shefftz admitted that his report as a whole depends upon "data and cost figures from the Cabrera<br />

Report" and that he had "simply taken [Cabrera's] volume figures and ... cost figures and used<br />

those as inputs to [his] calculations." He explained that he "was not engaging in any exercise to<br />

verify [Cabrera's] data series or his cost figures. [Shefftz] was just using them in [his] report."<br />

Shefftz also conceded that his reliance on the Cabrera Report and its flawed numbers could "lend<br />

an upward bias" to his own results. Furthermore, an annex of Shefftz's draft report relies heavily<br />

on annex T to the Cabrera report-an annex that was drafted by Stratus, the consultants who<br />

ghostwrote the Cabrera Report.<br />

197. The reports of other experts, such as Carlos Picone, Robert Paolo Scardina, and<br />

Daniel Rourke were written "in collaboration with the Weinberg Group," the group that had been<br />

hired not to create new reports but rather to repackage the Cabrera Report. Sections of Picone's<br />

report were written entirely by the Weinberg Group, with only "minimal" editing by Picone.<br />

78

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!