24.02.2013 Views

hRb7u

hRb7u

hRb7u

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

job." And when the RICO Defendants heard that the Republic of Ecuador might be considering<br />

negotiating with Chevron directly, they pushed to have those conversations shut down, urging<br />

that no "representative ofthe Ecuadorian government ... meet face to face with a representative<br />

of Chevron at this j uncture[.]"<br />

67. The Lago Agrio complaint does not name the entity that has been responsible for<br />

environmental harm in the Oriente region since at least 1992: Petroecuador. Pursuant to their<br />

agreement not to bring any claims against Petroecuador or the Republic of Ecuador itself, the<br />

Lago Agrio Plaintiffs' U.S. representatives caused Chevron to be named as the only defendant in<br />

the Lago Agrio Litigation, despite the fact that Chevron has never operated in Ecuador. (Years<br />

after TexPet ceased operations in Ecuador, one of Chevron's subsidiaries merged with Texaco,<br />

TexPet's ultimate parent company. Chevron thereby became an indirect shareholder ofTexPet.)<br />

B. The Conspirators Are Corrupting the Judicial Process to Extort a Payment<br />

From Chevron<br />

68. The support of the Republic of Ecuador, the manipulation of the EMA, and the<br />

filing of the Lago Agrio Litigation provided the U.S. lawyers with the foundation for their<br />

criminal scheme. Through the conduct oftheir criminal enterprise, the conspirators set about to<br />

manufacture false evidence and a fake "history" that they would repeat in every media outlet,<br />

before Congress, in front of state and federal investigative and administrative agencies, and with<br />

which they would seek to scare and mislead Chevron shareholders and investors. All of this was<br />

done in furtherance oftheir scheme to coerce Chevron into making a massive payoff to the<br />

criminal enterprise. As part ofthis scheme, the conspirators keep "jack[ing] up," in Donziger's<br />

words, their demand. In 2003, they thought $6 billion was an aggressive number. In 2008, they<br />

raised the stakes to $16 billion, then to $27 billion, and finally, to an outrageous $113 billion,<br />

before ultimately obtaining an $18.2 billion judgment in Lago Agrio.<br />

69. The RI CO Defendants' criminal scheme has three main lines of attack: One,<br />

intimidate or corrupt the Lago Agrio court and obtain a fraudulent judgment against Chevron<br />

based on manufactured evidence of liability. Two, collude with the Republic of Ecuador to<br />

31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!