24.02.2013 Views

hRb7u

hRb7u

hRb7u

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

attempt to apply it retroactively, the Lago Agrio Litigation is unusual in structure. The<br />

ostensible plaintiffs in the Lago Agrio Litigation are forty-eight named individuals, but it is<br />

unknown whether these individuals consented to have the litigation brought in their names, as<br />

twenty of their signatures were forged in the very document that purported to provide authority<br />

to Ecuadorian counsel to file the complaint.<br />

65. The Lago Agrio Litigation does not seek damages based on personal injuries to<br />

the named Plaintiffs, which, along with claims for individual property damage, is the only type<br />

of claim individuals could bring (see paragraph 57, supra). Rather, relying on the EMA, the<br />

complaint seeks the costs ofremediating broadly defined "environmental damages," the proceeds<br />

of which will not directly benefit the Lago Agrio Plaintiffs. Defendants Donziger, Fajardo and<br />

the other U.S. and Ecuadorian lawyers and investors reportedly expect up to 30% of the<br />

judgment. The Republic of Ecuador reportedly expects 90% of the benefit, although the RICO<br />

Defendants with assistance from Patton Boggs, H5 and other co-conspirators have already laid<br />

out plans to "keep the proceeds out of Ecuador," by placing the funds in a "trust" outside of the<br />

country, under the exclusive control of a trustee they approve. The RICO Defendants requested<br />

that the Front receive an additional amount equal to 10% of the judgment (a fact that Donziger<br />

thought "best if Chevron did not know" out of concern that it "could harm the image" of the<br />

litigation), and the trial court granted that request in its judgment. The individual Lago Agrio<br />

Plaintiffs, on the other hand, will not receive any portion of the judgment, and thus are at most<br />

only nominal plaintiffs.<br />

66. In effect, the RICO Defendants are planning to control nearly all of the proceeds<br />

from the judgment, shutting out the Lago Agrio Plaintiffs, the Republic of Ecuador, and<br />

Petroecuador and setting themselves up as a source of patronage through billions of dollars in<br />

remediation contracts that will be issued following an adverse judgment against Chevron, in a<br />

country whose entire annual Gross Domestic Product is just over $64 billion. In an email<br />

exchange with Fajardo and Donziger, for example, co-conspirator Julio Prieto noted that<br />

"Petroecuador is NOT the one who must contract the remediation companies .... That's our<br />

30

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!