24.02.2013 Views

hRb7u

hRb7u

hRb7u

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chevron, working closely with the other RICO Defendants in this action. For Chevron's claims<br />

for violations of 18 U .S.C. § 1962 and New York state law, exercise of jurisdiction over<br />

Donziger is proper pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1965(a) and N.Y. C.P.L.R. 301.<br />

26. Exercise of jurisdiction over the Law Offices of Steven R. Donziger and<br />

Donziger & Associates, PLLC is reasonable and proper in this District because the Law Offices<br />

of Steven R. Donziger and Donziger & Associates, PLLC are citizens of New York, and because<br />

they conduct extensive business activities in the State. Further, by and through the activities of<br />

Donziger described above, the Law Offices of Steven R. Donziger and Donziger & Associates<br />

PLLC have served as key players in the conspiracy against Chevron. For Chevron's claims for<br />

violations of 18 U .S.C. § 1962 and New York state law, exercise of jurisdiction over the Law<br />

Offices of Steven R. Donziger and Donziger & Associates, PLLC is proper pursuant to 18 U .S.c.<br />

§ 1965(a) and N.Y. C.P.L.R. 301.<br />

27. Defendants Stratus, Beltman, and Maest are all residents of the United States.<br />

For Chevron's claims for violations of 18 u.s.c. § 1962, the exercise of jurisdiction over each of<br />

these defendants is proper in this District pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1965(b). The ends of justice<br />

require application of the nationwide service provisions of 18 U.S.c. § 1965(b) because there is<br />

no district in which all of the RICO Defendants could otherwise be tried together. For Chevron's<br />

claims under New York state law, exercise of jurisdiction over Defendants Stratus, Beitman, and<br />

Maest is proper pursuant to N.Y. C.P.L.R. 301 and 302. Through their agents and co­<br />

conspirators, Defendants Stratus, Beltman, and Maest have transacted and continue to transact<br />

business in the State of New York, and there is a substantial nexus between Defendants Stratus,<br />

Beltman, and Maest's purposeful availment of the New York forum and Chevron's claims.<br />

28. Exercise of jurisdiction over Fajardo is proper pursuant to 18 U .S.c. § 1965(b)<br />

and N.Y. C.P.L.R. 301 and 302. Fajardo has transacted business and engaged in tortious conduct<br />

in the United States and New York which gives rise in part to Chevron's claims. Among other<br />

things, Fajardo (i) met with his co-conspirators in the United States multiple times to plan the<br />

ghostwriting of the Cabrera Report, including trips to New York to meet with Donziger and to<br />

14

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!