18.02.2013 Views

VOWELS IN STANDARD AUSTRIAN GERMAN - Acoustics ...

VOWELS IN STANDARD AUSTRIAN GERMAN - Acoustics ...

VOWELS IN STANDARD AUSTRIAN GERMAN - Acoustics ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Sylvia Moosmüller<br />

back cavity affiliation of F3. Figure 4.9 also displays the stepwise change in vowel<br />

quality in dependence on the speaking task or degree of formality.<br />

The [–constricted] unrounded pre-palatal vowel /ç/ is not affected by this problem,<br />

since the originally higher constriction degree prevents a switch in cavity affiliation. It<br />

can be seen from Figure 4.10 that F2, F3, and F4 are approximately evenly spaced.<br />

Figure 4.10: Average spectrum of the vowel /ç/ taken from the logatome “pibbe”, speaker sp012.<br />

The primary difference between /i/ and /ç/ is tongue-palate distance, i.e. constriction<br />

degree. This parameter affects all formants; as constriction is widened, F1 increases 76 ,<br />

and F2 and F3 decrease monotonously. Therefore, F1 has to be higher for /ç/ than for /i/,<br />

F2 has to be lower or equal 77 , and F3 has to be lower within each speaking task or<br />

prosodic position. However, Pouplier et al. (2004) pointed out that tongue-palate<br />

distances were neutralized between the pair /i/ – /ç/ for all three subjects. Tables 4.12 –<br />

4.14 give the mean F1, F2, and F3 values for the pair /i/ – /ç/.<br />

76 However, the degree of lip aperture is the most obvious correlate of F1 (Hoole 1997).<br />

77 Depending on the cavity affiliation of F2.<br />

88

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!