VOWELS IN STANDARD AUSTRIAN GERMAN - Acoustics ...
VOWELS IN STANDARD AUSTRIAN GERMAN - Acoustics ...
VOWELS IN STANDARD AUSTRIAN GERMAN - Acoustics ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
77<br />
Vowels in Standard Austrian German<br />
below that point differences between tense and lax variants are inconsistent in sign and<br />
considerably smaller in magnitude. (Tiede 1996: 415f)<br />
And he continues:<br />
The English sagittal measurements showing smaller differences in magnitude for both<br />
tongue root advancement and laryngeal lowering than Akan, and greater differences in<br />
tongue dorsum height, suggest a relatively more significant role for tongue height in<br />
maintaining the English contrast. (Tiede 1996: 418)<br />
Tiede (1996) also elaborates on the relationship between dorsum height and tongue root<br />
advancement, two adjustments that may be intrinsically linked. Whereas Akan,<br />
however, controls the muscle responsible for a concomitant change in tongue height for<br />
[+ATR] vowels, tongue height is accompanied with tongue root advancement in<br />
English. Therefore, it can be inferred that the primary feature used to express the<br />
tense/lax distinction in English is tongue height with facultative accompanying tongue<br />
root advancement, whereas in Akan the distinction is expressed primarily by tongue<br />
root advancement. The accompanying raise of the tongue dorsum is suppressed.<br />
Ladefoged and Maddieson (1996) come to similar conclusions:<br />
In Igbo and Akan the tongue height is not correlated with the tongue root position. In English<br />
the position of the tongue root is correlated with the tongue height…..We conclude that the<br />
advancement of the tongue root is a separable tongue gesture in languages such as Igbo and<br />
Akan. In Germanic languages, however, it is simply one of the concomitants of vowel<br />
height. (Ladefoged & Maddieson 1996: 303f)<br />
Recently, following up the hypothesis proposed by Halle & Stevens (1969), Slifka<br />
(2003) tested F1 slope (indicating breathiness) and point in time of the energy peak for<br />
tense/lax vowel pairs in English. Although 88,9% of all tense vowels exposed a falling<br />
slope and 91,7% of all lax vowels exposed a rising slope, indicating more breathiness in<br />
the tense vowels, her results are not consistent across the speakers tested and ultimately<br />
fail to classify vowels correctly. It has to be noted, furthermore, that breathiness is not<br />
only a facultative consequence of advanced tongue root, but also of tongue fronting and<br />
tongue heightening. Therefore, the feature ATR cannot be inferred from increased<br />
breathiness. Consequently, the feature [± ATR] is not responsible for the opposition<br />
termed [± tense] in the Germanic languages.