18.02.2013 Views

VOWELS IN STANDARD AUSTRIAN GERMAN - Acoustics ...

VOWELS IN STANDARD AUSTRIAN GERMAN - Acoustics ...

VOWELS IN STANDARD AUSTRIAN GERMAN - Acoustics ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Sylvia Moosmüller<br />

the same way: listeners discriminated tense and lax vowel pairs much better when<br />

temporal information was additionally available in the silence center stimuli 58 . The<br />

vowel chart presented in Sendlmeier (1981: 302) only displays spectral differences in<br />

one dimension (either F1 or F2) for those vowels, which were judged primarily for<br />

duration, whereas the other vowels, which were judged on the basis of spectral<br />

differences, differ for both F1 and F2.<br />

In Swedish, a language which also discerns long/tense vs. short/lax vowels<br />

(Schaeffler & Wretling 2002), on the other hand, listeners contrast the vowel pairs /i:/-/ç/<br />

and /o:/-/O/ primarily on the basis of durational information, whereas they use additional<br />

spectral information for the pair /A:/-/a/ (Behne et al. 1999). Schaeffler & Wretling<br />

(2002), who compared long and short /a/ in Northern Swedish dialects, proved the<br />

hypothesis that stronger quality differences only go along with minor durational<br />

differences and vice versa for some dialects.<br />

No spectral information is used for the discrimination of long and short vowel<br />

pairs in Japanese (Behne et al. 1999), although vowel duration is not robust across<br />

speech styles (Kozasa 2002) and spectral differences can be observed (Hirata &<br />

Tsukada 2004). In discriminating long vs. short vowels in Japanese, listeners make use<br />

of word/vowel ratios, which proved to be very stable across speech styles (Hirata 2004).<br />

Therefore, the primary feature contrasting vowel pairs in a given language can<br />

either be a temporal or a spectral one. The respective other – secondary – feature might<br />

or might not be made relevant, when the other either fails to convey the required<br />

opposition or starts to become neutralized. Perception tests reveal that Japanese and<br />

Swedish contrast their vowels along a temporal dimension. The primary contrastive<br />

feature therefore is [± long]. In English and German, on the other hand, listeners<br />

primarily use spectral information to contrast the vowels. Vowel duration only becomes<br />

relevant when spectral information is blurred. Therefore, it can be concluded that<br />

58 The main aim of the Strange & Bohn (1998) study was to test the relevance of dynamic<br />

information in the perception of coarticulated vowels.<br />

58

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!