VOWELS IN STANDARD AUSTRIAN GERMAN - Acoustics ...
VOWELS IN STANDARD AUSTRIAN GERMAN - Acoustics ...
VOWELS IN STANDARD AUSTRIAN GERMAN - Acoustics ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
53<br />
Vowels in Standard Austrian German<br />
Figure 4.1 reveals that the /e/ – vowels dominate the Austrian German vowel system,<br />
followed by the /i/ – vowels and the /a/ – vowels. Dividing the vowels according to two<br />
stress levels, the /e/ – vowels, with 21.9%, lose their predominant position for the<br />
stressed vowels and are relegated to the third place after the /a/ – vowels and the /i/ –<br />
vowels (with 26.3% and 25.5% respectively). In unstressed positions, however, they<br />
come first and, with 34.4%, outclass the /a/ – vowels and the /i/ – vowels by more than<br />
10% (24% and 22.7% respectively). The /u/ – vowels and the /o/ – vowels are evenly<br />
distributed over stress positions: 9.8 % and 8% for the /u/ – vowels in stressed and<br />
unstressed positions, and 11.7% and 9.6% for the /o/ – vowels.<br />
features:<br />
The 14 vowels are usually discriminated according to the following distinctive<br />
Tongue height [±high]: /i:, ç, y:, Y, u:, ï, o:, O/ vs. /e:, E, ë:, ê/ vs. /a, A:/<br />
Tongue position [±front]: /i:, ç, y:, Y, e:, E, ë:, ê, a/ vs. /u:, ï, o:, O, A:/<br />
Lip position [±round]: /u:, ï, o:, O, y:, Y, ë:, ê / vs. /i:, ç, e:, E, a, A:/<br />
Tenseness [±tense]: /i:, y:, e:, ë:, u:, o:, A:/ vs. /ç, Y, E, ê, ï, O, a/<br />
The last of the four categories has been and still is the subject of extensive controversy.<br />
First of all, it is not quite clear what the exact articulatory correlates to tenseness should<br />
be. Is it tenseness of the vocal tract walls, or tenseness of lip articulation triggering a<br />
more spread or more protruded articulation of the tense vowels as compared to the lax<br />
vowels? Is it tenseness of the tongue, resulting in a tighter constriction and a longer<br />
constriction area for the tense vowels as compared to their lax counterparts? Or does<br />
tenseness correlate with settings of the pharyngeal region, resulting in an advancement<br />
of the tongue root as has been described for several African languages like Igbo<br />
(Ladefoged 1964), Akan (Tiede 1996), Degema (Fulop et al. 1998), Maa (Guion et al.<br />
2004)?<br />
The observed opposition might also be the result of distinctive jaw position, the<br />
tense vowels being more closed than their lax counterparts. In this case, the feature