18.02.2013 Views

VOWELS IN STANDARD AUSTRIAN GERMAN - Acoustics ...

VOWELS IN STANDARD AUSTRIAN GERMAN - Acoustics ...

VOWELS IN STANDARD AUSTRIAN GERMAN - Acoustics ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Sylvia Moosmüller<br />

Although Figure 7.2 suggests significant differences between the three speakers by<br />

means of F3, these differences cannot withstand a statistical analysis. Neither a two-<br />

tailed t-test nor the z-deviation renders differences for F3 between sp126 and sp127.<br />

One could argue that a visual comparison of the distributions might suffice to<br />

keep the speakers apart. However, in a cross-check comparison of one and the same<br />

speaker in different speaking tasks, the distribution of formants need not result in a<br />

satisfying overlap either. Figure 7.3 shows a density plot of all vowels /ç/ from “nicht”<br />

(not) of one speaker (sp126) in the sentence reading task and in spontaneous speech:<br />

c(xmin, xmax)<br />

0.000 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.005 0.006 0.007<br />

1500 2000 2500 3000 3500<br />

Figure 7.3: Density plot of F2 and F3 of the vowel /ç/ from “nicht” (not), sentence reading task<br />

(red) and spontaneous speech (black), n = 18.<br />

Index<br />

A visual inspection would render differences for F3. Calculated z-scores, however,<br />

correctly prove accordance for the /ç/ of spontaneous speech with the /ç/ of the sentence<br />

reading task with respect to both F2 and F3.<br />

240

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!