18.02.2013 Views

VOWELS IN STANDARD AUSTRIAN GERMAN - Acoustics ...

VOWELS IN STANDARD AUSTRIAN GERMAN - Acoustics ...

VOWELS IN STANDARD AUSTRIAN GERMAN - Acoustics ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Sylvia Moosmüller<br />

7. Speaker-specific traits<br />

Throughout the analysis on vowels in Standard Austrian German, speaker-specific traits<br />

emerged. These especially showed up in the dealing with variation, but speaker-specific<br />

traits also occurred in the phonemic representation ([±constricted] vs. [±open]).<br />

Therefore, if one wants to look at speaker-specific traits, one has to go into detail.<br />

Approaches which pool together all vowels (Grigoras & Nolan 2005) 157 , run the risk of<br />

blurring most of the speaker-specific information and might arrive at correspondences<br />

where there are none. For example, one-way ANOVA calculated over all stressed<br />

vowels of spontaneous speech renders no differences between the three male speakers<br />

for F2 (F2,371 = 0.33, p = 0.72). As regards F3, differences show up for speaker sp127,<br />

but none between sp012 and sp126. F1 renders no differences between speaker sp012<br />

and sp127, but differences for speaker sp126. Given the fact that in true forensic cases,<br />

F1 can hardly ever be mobilised because of the frequency band limitation of the<br />

telephone (see Künzel 2001 and Nolan 2002 on the usability of formants in speaker<br />

identification), an analysis of the three male speakers would result in a correspondence<br />

of speaker sp012 and speaker126. As concerns the female speakers, all three speakers<br />

differ for F1, but, again, two speakers (sp129 and sp082) cannot be kept apart with<br />

respect to F2 and F3 in spontaneous speech.<br />

The situation is slightly better for the unstressed vowels of spontaneous speech.<br />

All three male speakers are kept apart via F3. As concerns F2, speakers sp126 and<br />

sp127 are differentiated, whilst speaker sp012 is not. The three female speakers are kept<br />

apart by F1, F2, and F3. Therefore, as has been pointed out in Moosmüller (2002),<br />

based on the theoretical considerations put forward in Dressler (1979), in forensic<br />

157<br />

Grigoras & Nolan (2005) point out themselves that such an analysis has to be extended by<br />

an additional detailed analysis.<br />

234

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!