18.02.2013 Views

VOWELS IN STANDARD AUSTRIAN GERMAN - Acoustics ...

VOWELS IN STANDARD AUSTRIAN GERMAN - Acoustics ...

VOWELS IN STANDARD AUSTRIAN GERMAN - Acoustics ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Sylvia Moosmüller<br />

comprises both phonology and phonetics. Since both the phoneme and the final product<br />

of the phoneme are intended, the target has often been confused with the phoneme (see<br />

6.1). The difficulty keeping phonetics and phonology apart has occupied phonological<br />

theory ever since Baudouin de Courtenay disunited phonetics into “Anthropophonik”<br />

and “Psychophonetik” (see Häusler 1976), and still tempts linguists to give up the<br />

distinction between phonetics and phonology (e.g. Port to appear). I will show in 6.3<br />

that a phonological analysis is indispensible for a thorough understanding by which<br />

principles the final appearance of an utterance is lead (see also Moosmüller 2007a).<br />

In order to avoid confusion, both a phonetic and a phonological analysis have to<br />

be performed. An output realization is, in any case, the result of the application of<br />

postlexical processes which more or less modify the phoneme. Where the output<br />

realization is identical with the phoneme 19 , no process is applied. Therefore, the<br />

application of no process is included in the plan (one could also speak of a zero<br />

process). Our knowledge about processes allows us to backtrace a phonetic output to its<br />

phoneme.<br />

What then, is a phoneme? According to the most cited definition of Baudouin de<br />

Courteney, it is<br />

“eine einheitliche 20 , der phonetischen Welt angehörende Vorstellung, welche mittelst<br />

psychischer Verschmelzung der durch die Aussprache eines und desselben Lautes erhaltenen<br />

Eindrücke in der Seele entsteht = psychischer Äquivalent des Sprachlautes. Mit der<br />

einheitlichen Vorstellung des Phonems verknüpft sich (associiert sich) eine gewisse Summe<br />

einzelner anthropophonischer Vorstellungen, welche einerseits Articulations-Vorstellungen,<br />

andererseits aber akustische Vorstellungen, d. h. Vorstellungen gehörter oder im Gehörtwerden<br />

begriffener Resultate jener physiologischen Arbeiten, sind.“ (Baudouin de Courtenay<br />

1895/1984: 65)<br />

Whereas talking is impermanent, the phoneme is not. According to this definition, the<br />

phoneme is a mental imprint (“Eindrücke in der Seele”) which is altered according to<br />

our phonetic habits:<br />

19<br />

For example in sustained vowel production tasks.<br />

20<br />

Later on, Baudouin de Courtenay replaces “einheitlich” (uniform) with “ständig”<br />

(permanent) (Häusler 1976: 61).<br />

12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!