VOWELS IN STANDARD AUSTRIAN GERMAN - Acoustics ...
VOWELS IN STANDARD AUSTRIAN GERMAN - Acoustics ...
VOWELS IN STANDARD AUSTRIAN GERMAN - Acoustics ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Sylvia Moosmüller<br />
windows for Russian vowels. Russian vowel allophony already highly challenged, if not<br />
defeated by Öhmann’s (1966) vowel-to-vowel coarticualtory model. Yet,<br />
conceptualizing as residual “arbitrariness” that which cannot be explained in the same<br />
way as for Germanic languages, should be avoided in linguistic theories.<br />
Russian vowel allophony, however, is highly systematic:<br />
“We agree that the variability of Russian vowels is tremendous but at the same time is of<br />
systematic character that must and can be captured by systematic and scrupulous study of all<br />
the aspects of vowel functioning in speech under strict control of relevant variables.”<br />
(Kouznetsov 2001: 439)<br />
It has been shown in the previous chapter that the vowel /i/, which is usually attributed a<br />
high coarticulatory resistance (Recasens 1999, Fowler & Brancazio 2000), palatalizes<br />
the previous plosive in Standard Austrian German. Therefore, the vowel /i/ is not<br />
affected by the preceding plosive.<br />
In Russian, with its palatalised and non-palatalised consonants, the situation is<br />
inverse. The palatalised – non-palatalised opposition has to be preserved, irrespective of<br />
the vocalic environment. If, in the same way as in Standard Austrian German, /i/ would<br />
palatalize the non-palatalised consonant, a phonemic contrast would be lost. Therefore,<br />
it is the consonant that changes the vowel. In a palatalised context, the quality of /i/ is of<br />
course preserved. But,<br />
“/i/ following a nonpalatalized consonant is repelled from the high-front position in the<br />
vowel quadrilateral and acquires a [I]-like (or even [ì]-like) onglide. It is usually said that<br />
Russian /i/ has the allophone [I] following a nonpalatalized consonant, […] F2 of /i/ tends to<br />
follow a rather sigmoid course following a nonpalatalized consonant, having only a slight<br />
slope at the release of the consonant, then rising fairly steeply, then, finally, leveling off<br />
again toward its target.” (Howie 2001: 18)<br />
The difference between Standard Austrian German and Russian 121 lies in the language<br />
specific phonologies with resulting different processes. A process which changes the<br />
quality of the vowel /i/ preceded by a non-palatal consonant (Russian) is as “natural” as<br />
a process changing the quality of the consonant preceding the vowel /i/ (Standard<br />
Austrian German). The phonology of a language decides which processes have to be<br />
121 Kouznetsov (2001) analyzes speakers from Moscow, Howie (2001) does not further<br />
specify the variety he analyses and models.<br />
186