18.02.2013 Views

VOWELS IN STANDARD AUSTRIAN GERMAN - Acoustics ...

VOWELS IN STANDARD AUSTRIAN GERMAN - Acoustics ...

VOWELS IN STANDARD AUSTRIAN GERMAN - Acoustics ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

185<br />

Vowels in Standard Austrian German<br />

already been observed elsewhere (e.g. Abbs 1986). Vaissière (1986) attributes this lack<br />

of invariance partly to non-linguistic factors and partly to “context-dependent<br />

articulatory “weights” assigned by the speaker to different parts of the syllable.”<br />

(Vaissière 1986: 222). The results of Scarborough (2004) are in the same vein: “hard” 120<br />

words expose a higher degree of coarticulation than “easy” words. Moreover, she<br />

proved that the presence of coarticulation facilitates perception, and that, consequently,<br />

listeners make use of coarticulatory information. These findings together with the<br />

observed language-specific differences rule out biomechanical factors and suggest that<br />

processes are at work. Moreover, within the figure-ground preference of Natural<br />

Phonology (Dressler 1984, 1986, 1996), the analysed phenomenon can be characterized<br />

as a foregrounding process.<br />

6.3. Phoneme, allophone, target, and processes<br />

The examples discussed in 6.2 show that the target is variant and has to be<br />

conceptualized differently from the phoneme which is invariant (see 1.2). The phoneme<br />

is the mental representation of a sound and can be modified by processes. The final<br />

output of the phoneme is usually hit by speakers with no speaking or hearing deficits<br />

and under normal speaking conditions. In this way, the final output is an invariant<br />

target, cf. Keating (1990):<br />

“… any single given context reduces, not introduces, variability in a segment” (Keating<br />

1990: 461).<br />

However, since Keating does not assume processes or rules, she allows “arbitrary<br />

variation” (1990: 467). The example given for arbitrary variation is Russian, “with<br />

extensive vowel allophony and reduction” (1990: 467), modelled by defining wide<br />

120 Hard words are words, which, with respect to their intelligibility, expose a low frequency<br />

relative to the sum of the frequencies of all their neighbours and are therefore obscured by<br />

their neighbours, whereas easy words have a high frequency relative to the sum of the<br />

frequencies of all their neighbours and – consequently – stand out against their<br />

neighbours.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!