18.02.2013 Views

VOWELS IN STANDARD AUSTRIAN GERMAN - Acoustics ...

VOWELS IN STANDARD AUSTRIAN GERMAN - Acoustics ...

VOWELS IN STANDARD AUSTRIAN GERMAN - Acoustics ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Sylvia Moosmüller<br />

the following consonant (in English, for example, “im+possible”, Italian<br />

“im+possibile”, or German “un+möglich” (impossible) etc.). These sequences are<br />

caused by morphology. The “difficulty”, which has arisen through a prelexically<br />

excluded combination of phonemes (alveolar + bilabial), is eliminated by a prelexical<br />

process in English and Italian 6 , and by a postlexical process in German. A similar<br />

treatment can be observed for /s#S/ sequences in German, e.g. /hAOs#SuE/ “Hausschuhe”<br />

(slippers). These processes aim at restoring a “pronounceable” sequence in the given<br />

language, whereby “pronounceability” is defined by the prelexical processes of a given<br />

language. These processes, which repair the sequential order of a language, are not<br />

restricted to informal speech situations.<br />

The situation where the nasal and the preceding consonant are separated by a<br />

vowel, as in /tragEn/ “tragen” (to carry) etc., is slightly different. In order to meet the<br />

same condition as above, the vowel has to be deleted first. In Standard Austrian<br />

German, vowel deletion is restricted to less formal speech situations. Consequently,<br />

nasal assimilation experiences the same situational restrictions 7 . But as soon as the<br />

vowel is deleted, the nasal has to be assimilated.<br />

Casual speech processes therefore have to be kept apart from processes which<br />

repair disallowed phoneme combinations. The latter are independent of the speech<br />

situation and cannot be classified as casual speech processes. Casual speech processes<br />

serve other principles. In Austrian German, a typical process often seen as ease of<br />

articulation is the spirantization of lenis plosives in the intervocalic position. In the<br />

intervocalic position, /b, d, g/ can become /B, D, V/, as in [A:Ba] “aber” (but), [laEDa]<br />

“leider” (unfortunately), or [he:Ve] “hege: 1 st P.” (to take care). Since the air can flow<br />

6 Italian also has postlexical processes for sequences, e.g. “un bacio” (a kiss), which might<br />

even further assimilate to “um masu” in Sicilian (Hyman 2001). The same process might<br />

occur in English “non#basic”.<br />

7 In the Bavarian variants of German, including Standard Austrian German, vowel deletion<br />

between two nasal consonants (e.g. /SvçmEn/ “schwimmen” (to swim)) is supressed. This<br />

corroborates the assumption that process application is not primarily lead by ease of<br />

articulation.<br />

6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!