18.02.2013 Views

VOWELS IN STANDARD AUSTRIAN GERMAN - Acoustics ...

VOWELS IN STANDARD AUSTRIAN GERMAN - Acoustics ...

VOWELS IN STANDARD AUSTRIAN GERMAN - Acoustics ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

109<br />

Vowels in Standard Austrian German<br />

“gugge”, gukke” (2x), “puppe”, and “kukke” 80 . T-tests render no differences with the<br />

vowel /u/ for F1 and F2, and a slight difference for F3, the value being lower for the<br />

phonologically [–constricted] vowel, pointing to a difference in constriction degree.<br />

4.4.4. The upper pharyngeal vowels<br />

A constriction in the upper pharyngeal region leads to a low F1, low F2, and a high F3.<br />

Accompanied by lip protrusion, a low F2 value is maintained over long stretches of<br />

constriction locations (quantal region, Stevens 1972, 1989); consequently, there is<br />

hardly any difference in F2 between /u/ and /o/. Acoustically, the difference between /u/<br />

and /o/ is carried out by F1 and F3, which are both higher for /o/ (see Figure 4.24 as<br />

compared to Figure 4.22).<br />

Figure 4.24: Average spectrum of the vowel /o/ taken from the logatome “pobe”, speaker sp012.<br />

Both constriction degree and degree of lip opening are higher for the unconstricted<br />

cognate /O/. Degree of lip protrusion, however, does not differ substantially (Valaczkai<br />

1998). Pouplier et al. (2004) report higher tongue-palate distance for unconstricted /O/.<br />

Consequently, F1 and F2 are higher for /O/, and F3 is lower than for /o/ (Figure 4.25).<br />

80 Interestingly, Pouplier et al. (2004), who observed neutralization of tongue-palate<br />

distance for the /u/-vowels, analyzed their vowels in velar context.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!