18.02.2013 Views

VOWELS IN STANDARD AUSTRIAN GERMAN - Acoustics ...

VOWELS IN STANDARD AUSTRIAN GERMAN - Acoustics ...

VOWELS IN STANDARD AUSTRIAN GERMAN - Acoustics ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

103<br />

Vowels in Standard Austrian German<br />

It can be read from Figure 4.19 that, with the exception of speaker sp082, all speakers<br />

differentiate /e/ – /ç/ at least with one formant in spontaneous speech in the stressed<br />

position. These results hold also for the logatome reading task. Therefore, in Standard<br />

Austrian German, these two vowels are clearly kept apart. It is interesting, however, that<br />

for unstressed positions in the sentence reading task, all speakers discriminate the two<br />

vowels by all three formants, and for unstressed positions in spontaneous speech, five<br />

speakers discriminate the two vowels by means of all three formants, and one speaker<br />

(sp082) by means of F2 and F3. This means that, contrary to expectations and contrary<br />

to the results presented so far, the discriminatory power is stronger in unstressed<br />

positions. Although no explanation can be presented for this behaviour, it clearly shows,<br />

at least, that /e/ is by no means the cognate of /ç/.<br />

For the mid-palatal vowel /ë/, moderate lip protrusion with compensatory larynx<br />

lowering leads to an approximation of F2 and F3. Contrary to /y/, the two peaks could,<br />

however, be dissolved in most cases (see Figure 4.20).<br />

Figure 4.20: Average spectrum of the vowel /ë/ taken from the logatome “pöbe”, speaker sp012.<br />

Following the articulatory description given in Valaczkai (1998), the unconstricted /ê/<br />

is – as compared to its constricted cognate – produced with a higher degree of lip<br />

opening (although some overlap is reported), an approximately equal degree of lip<br />

protrusion, and a wider constriction degree 79 , leading to a higher coupling of the front<br />

79 In Pouplier et al. (2004), no tongue-palate distances for the constricted vowel /ë/ are<br />

given.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!