15.02.2013 Views

world cancer report - iarc

world cancer report - iarc

world cancer report - iarc

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Climbing plants on trellis at end<br />

reduces indirect UV radiation whilst<br />

admitting cooling breezes.<br />

Side flap<br />

reduces indirect<br />

UVR<br />

Means of sun protection include the provision<br />

of shade that falls in the right place at<br />

the right time of day (Fig. 4.13). Shade barriers,<br />

which may be either structures or<br />

trees, need to be of sufficient size, and provide<br />

at least 94% protection against direct<br />

ultraviolet radiation [9]. Natural shade is<br />

attractive because of its aesthetic appeal,<br />

cooling effect and fewer disposal problems<br />

than with built shade. Advantages of the<br />

latter include the precision with which<br />

shade needs can be met and other uses<br />

including rainwater collection and solar<br />

power generation. Provision of adequate<br />

and appropriate shade requires planning,<br />

an aspect of which is a “shade audit” to<br />

determine the adequacy of existing shade.<br />

Planning additional shade requires consideration<br />

of safety, site usage patterns, climatic<br />

conditions, aesthetics, sightlines and<br />

the possibility of vandalism.<br />

Most summer clothing provides protection<br />

factors against sunburn of greater than 10;<br />

more than 85% of fabrics tested have protection<br />

factors of 20 or more. Factors that<br />

affect the protection offered by fabrics<br />

against sunlight include weave, colour,<br />

weight, stretch and wetness [10]. By comparison<br />

with other options, scant attention<br />

142 Prevention and screening<br />

Low reflective soft fall matting<br />

Front extension<br />

increases size of<br />

shaded area<br />

Low reflective<br />

grass surface<br />

Fig. 4.13 Structural and other design features of a garden shelter designed to provide protection from<br />

exposure to the sun.<br />

is given to sun-protective clothing in relevant<br />

groups [11].<br />

Sunscreens are available <strong>world</strong>wide as<br />

consumer products; the European Union<br />

and USA account for 75% of the <strong>world</strong><br />

market. Sunscreens are regulated either<br />

as cosmetics (European Union, Japan,<br />

South Africa and South America) or as<br />

drugs (USA, Canada and Australia).<br />

Investigations of sunscreen usage have<br />

included determination of who uses them,<br />

in what circumstances are they used, why<br />

sunscreens are used, and what has been<br />

the experience of users. It is evident that<br />

sunscreen usage affects other sun-related<br />

behaviour, such as deliberate engagement<br />

in sun exposure, the duration of such<br />

exposure, and the duration of incidental or<br />

intentional sun exposure [12].<br />

Sunscreens absorb ultraviolet radiation<br />

across the 290-400 nm spectrum.<br />

Efficacy is expressed through the “sunscreen<br />

protection factor” (SPF) which is<br />

the ratio of the least amount of ultraviolet<br />

energy required to produce minimal erythema<br />

on skin protected by the sunscreen<br />

in question to the energy required for the<br />

same effect on unprotected skin. Most<br />

commercial preparations are presented as<br />

having SPF values of up to 15-20. “Active”<br />

ingredients of sunscreens are the chemicals<br />

included to reduce the amount of<br />

ultraviolet radiation that reaches viable<br />

cells of the skin. Sunscreen formulations<br />

typically contain UVA absorbers (examples<br />

being cinnamates and derivatives of<br />

para-aminobenzoic acid) and UVB<br />

absorbers (such as the benzophenones)<br />

together with solvents, wetting and suspending<br />

agents and preservatives [13].<br />

Outcome<br />

A range of end-points may be employed to<br />

assess the efficacy of sun-protective activity<br />

as a means of preventing skin <strong>cancer</strong>. A<br />

high proportion of sun protection campaigns<br />

incorporate some measure of outcome,<br />

although few studies of large-scale<br />

community interventions have been<br />

<strong>report</strong>ed. In assessing the results of particular<br />

campaigns, it is important to consider<br />

whether people change their behaviour<br />

in ways that counteract the benefits of<br />

a sun protection campaign [13].<br />

The efficacy of particular interventions in<br />

reducing risk of <strong>cancer</strong> has been most<br />

comprehensively studied in relation to sunscreens.<br />

Sunscreens undoubtedly prevent<br />

sunburn. In experimental studies, sunscreens<br />

have been definitively shown to<br />

prevent squamous cell carcinoma induced<br />

by solar-simulated radiation in mice. The<br />

prevention of skin <strong>cancer</strong> in humans is less<br />

clearly established, determination of the<br />

issue being complicated by a number of<br />

factors. These include the consideration<br />

that use of the sunscreen may determine<br />

(and perhaps even encourage) sun exposure.<br />

Approximately half the relevant casecontrol<br />

studies recently reviewed by IARC<br />

(8/15) recorded significantly higher risks<br />

for melanoma in users of sunscreens than<br />

in non-users, while a minority of such studies<br />

showed lower risk for melanoma in<br />

users compared to non-users [13]. Some<br />

findings imply that sunscreen use may<br />

encourage prolonged sun exposure, a scenario<br />

which obviously complicates<br />

attempts to demonstrate protective<br />

effects of sunscreens. In contrast to the<br />

data concerning risk of melanoma, corresponding<br />

studies in relation to squamous<br />

cell carcinoma constituted “limited” evi-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!