15.02.2013 Views

world cancer report - iarc

world cancer report - iarc

world cancer report - iarc

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

co-induced disease, including the impact<br />

of environmental tobacco smoke. However,<br />

such limitations do not detract from the<br />

value of initiatives to reduce environmental<br />

pollution. Such measures may reasonably<br />

be presumed to contribute to prevention of<br />

<strong>cancer</strong>, even in the absence of definitive<br />

data.<br />

Air pollution<br />

Air pollution has decreased in most developed<br />

countries during recent decades. In<br />

some Central and Eastern European countries,<br />

such as Poland, there has been a<br />

significant reduction in emissions of air<br />

pollutants as a result of the implementation<br />

of environmental protection programmes<br />

[10]. However, even when an<br />

increased risk of <strong>cancer</strong> is attributable to<br />

environmental pollution, appropriate preventive<br />

measures may not be adopted.<br />

People living in villages in Cappadocia,<br />

Central Turkey, where the local stone used<br />

for house construction was contaminated<br />

with the carcinogenic fibre, erionite, were<br />

burdened with a very high incidence of<br />

pleural mesothelioma [11]. Attempts to<br />

relocate exposed individuals away from<br />

contaminated houses were hampered by<br />

economic constraints and there is anecdotal<br />

evidence that migrants from poorer<br />

parts of the country moved into some of<br />

the houses left empty.<br />

Regulation is the primary approach to<br />

preventing pollution-induced <strong>cancer</strong>.<br />

Improvements in air quality have been<br />

achieved by means of adopting guidelines<br />

and legislation, examples of which include<br />

the WHO Air Quality Guidelines for<br />

Europe, the National Ambient Air Quality<br />

Standards (US Environmental Protection<br />

Agency) and Council Directives on Air<br />

Quality (European Union). The Environmental<br />

Health Criteria series of the<br />

International Programme on Chemical<br />

Safety currently assesses the health risks<br />

of some 120 chemical compounds and<br />

mixtures. Limits have been set on motor<br />

vehicle exhaust emissions in many parts<br />

of the <strong>world</strong>. The Council of the European<br />

Communities has adopted a phased programme<br />

for the implementation of emission<br />

standards for carbon monoxide,<br />

hydrocarbons and nitrogen oxides from<br />

gasoline and diesel-powered vehicles [12].<br />

One aspect of the control of atmospheric<br />

pollution in relation to <strong>cancer</strong> concerns<br />

the limiting of ozone depletion. The 1987<br />

Montreal Protocol (mediated by United<br />

Nations Environment Programme and<br />

signed by 150 countries) has resulted in<br />

the cessation of production and consumption<br />

of a significant proportion of all<br />

ozone-depleting substances in industrialized<br />

countries. The <strong>world</strong>wide consumption<br />

of ozone-depleting substances<br />

decreased by nearly 75% in the seven<br />

years to 1996. As a result of the subsequent<br />

decline in the rate at which global<br />

ultraviolet radiation is increasing, it has<br />

been estimated that 1.5 million cases of<br />

melanoma may be prevented in the next<br />

60 years [13].<br />

Indoor air pollution is a major public<br />

health challenge, which demands action in<br />

terms of research and policy-making [14].<br />

The greatest burden of disease resulting<br />

from exposure to smoke from cooking<br />

Standard (mg/L) Countries<br />

(concentration and date standard was established, if known)<br />

< 0.01 Australia (0.007, 1996), European Union (1998),<br />

Japan (1993), Jordan (1991), Laos (1999), Mongolia (1999),<br />

Namibia, Syria (1994)<br />

0.01 -0.05 Canada (0.025, 1999)<br />

0.05 United States (considering lowering standard from<br />

0.05, 1986), Mexico (considering lowering standard, 1994)<br />

Operative measure Examples<br />

Bahrain, Bangladesh, Bolivia (1997), China, Egypt (1995),<br />

Indonesia (1990), Oman, Philippines (1978), Saudi Arabia,<br />

Sri Lanka (1983), Viet Nam (1989), Zimbabwe<br />

Table 4.7 Currently accepted national standards for arsenic in drinking water.<br />

Preventing exposure<br />

Use of gloves and face mask Pharmacists handling cytotoxic drugs<br />

Full respirator Specified emergency procedure for spillage of<br />

hazardous material<br />

Controlling exposure<br />

Environmental monitoring Measurement of asbestos fibre level in<br />

breathing zone<br />

Film badge to assess radiation exposure<br />

Assessing uptake and excretion Urinary measurement of metabolite, e.g.<br />

dimethylphosphate in workers exposed to<br />

dichlorvos<br />

Urine analysis for haematuria<br />

Determination of protein adducts and screening<br />

for preneoplastic lesions in MOCA {4,4'methylenebis(2-chloroaniline)}-exposed<br />

workers<br />

Determination of DNA adducts in coke oven<br />

workers exposed to polycyclic aromatic<br />

hydrocarbons<br />

Table 4.8 Means to either prevent or determine the level of exposure to occupational carcinogens.<br />

Reduction of occupational and environmental exposures 139

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!