world cancer report - iarc
world cancer report - iarc
world cancer report - iarc
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
cating that exposure to asbestos caused<br />
lung <strong>cancer</strong> accumulated from the 1930s<br />
and the evidence became conclusive during<br />
the 1950s and 1960s. However, only<br />
during the late 1970s were effective steps<br />
for limiting exposure initiated in some<br />
countries [4]. Even so, relatively little<br />
action concerning asbestos-induced <strong>cancer</strong><br />
has been taken in many countries<br />
(notably in the developing <strong>world</strong>, see<br />
below) until recently.<br />
After introduction of preventive measures,<br />
a progressive decrease in the risk of <strong>cancer</strong><br />
among relevant workers may be evident.<br />
This may be seen by comparing<br />
groups of workers who were employed in<br />
different time periods. For example, the<br />
risk of lung <strong>cancer</strong> decreased among<br />
cohorts of American workers who were<br />
potentially exposed to chloromethyl<br />
ethers. This hazard was reduced after<br />
1971, when a closed manufacturing system<br />
was introduced [5]. Among relevant<br />
workers, lung <strong>cancer</strong> incidence was greatest<br />
in the 1960s, and decreased after<br />
1974. Change in risk of <strong>cancer</strong> is also evident<br />
amongst Norwegian workers<br />
employed in a nickel refinery smelter from<br />
the beginning of operation in the 1910s<br />
until the 1960s [6] (Fig. 4.9). Major<br />
changes in the process occurred during<br />
this time, particularly after 1950. [7]. Risk<br />
of nasal <strong>cancer</strong> has decreased; excess<br />
risk of lung <strong>cancer</strong> has also decreased but<br />
to a lesser degree, which may be attributable<br />
to the effects of increased smoking.<br />
The situation in developing countries<br />
Most documented examples of successful<br />
prevention of occupational <strong>cancer</strong> involve<br />
developed countries. To some extent, these<br />
examples have also led to improvement in<br />
conditions of occupational hygiene in developing<br />
countries. The quality of industrial<br />
hygiene in the Chinese chemical industry<br />
improved markedly during the 1970s such<br />
that by 1981, air concentrations of vinyl<br />
chloride monomer were similar to those in<br />
industries in Europe and North America [8].<br />
However, lack of economic resources and<br />
health services may limit the adoption of<br />
preventive measures. Often, exposure levels<br />
in the informal employment sector and<br />
in small workshops, where a large propor-<br />
Fig. 4.9 Risk of lung <strong>cancer</strong> among nickel refinery workers, by year of first employment.<br />
Fig. 4.10 UK asbestos imports and predicted mesothelioma deaths in British men. Mortality from<br />
mesothelioma reflects past exposure to asbestos. Despite the ban on the use of asbestos in the early<br />
1990s, mesothelioma cases will continue to increase, with approximately 250,000 expected deaths in<br />
Europe over the next 35 years.<br />
tion of workers are located in developing<br />
countries, are high compared to “best practice”<br />
adopted in large facilities [9].<br />
Protective clothing may have limited effectiveness<br />
in some developing countries<br />
because of discomfort arising from its use<br />
in hot, humid climates. Exposure to<br />
asbestos, crystalline silica and pesticides<br />
are recognized priorities for control of occupational<br />
<strong>cancer</strong> hazards in developing countries.<br />
The greatest impact in terms of pre-<br />
vention of disease is likely to come from the<br />
establishment and enforcement of national<br />
and international regulatory controls.<br />
Child labour is another cause for concern.<br />
Even where regulations to protect workers<br />
from exposures to carcinogens are adopted,<br />
such regulations may not apply to children,<br />
who are often not employed legally [8].<br />
Some nations have established legislation<br />
that applies specifically to the employment<br />
of children: for example, a detailed list of<br />
Reduction of occupational and environmental exposures 137