14.02.2013 Views

SOBIBÓR - Holocaust Handbooks

SOBIBÓR - Holocaust Handbooks

SOBIBÓR - Holocaust Handbooks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

J. GRAF, T. KUES, C. MATTOGNO, <strong>SOBIBÓR</strong> 97<br />

that the corpses were burnt “with the help of firebombs, wood, and<br />

coal.” 233 In another account, published in Novitch’s anthology, Thomas<br />

mentions only coal as fuel. 234<br />

Many of the witnesses describe a stench supposedly emanating from<br />

decomposing corpses. It is a well known fact among police and people<br />

working in the field of forensics that the odor of putrefying corpses,<br />

which appears during the bloat stage of decomposition and is caused by<br />

the release of gases such as hydrogen sulfide and mercaptans (which, in<br />

turn, are the final products of bacterial metabolism) is “terrible” and<br />

overwhelming. 235 In the case of open or shallow mass graves, the smell<br />

can spread over large areas, depending on weather and wind conditions.<br />

American journalist Elizabeth Neuffer has described a visit to a mass<br />

grave in Bosnia thus: 236<br />

“You could smell the mass grave at Cerska long before you could<br />

see it. The sickly, sweet smell of the bodies came wafting through the<br />

trees lining the dirt track up to the grave.”<br />

In this case the mass grave contained only a few dozen corpses. 237 It<br />

seems highly doubtful that the inmates at Sobibór would have been able<br />

to determine by their olfactory senses alone if the decomposing bodies<br />

causing the stench numbered a few dozen, hundreds, thousands, or tens<br />

of thousands. In this context it is worth noting that the odor of decomposition<br />

is extremely persistent and may linger for months or even years<br />

after the disappearance of soft tissues or the removal of the decomposing<br />

corpse(s). 238<br />

Finally we come to the “evidence” that “no-one ever came out<br />

alive.” The problem of this argument becomes evident by even a cursory<br />

glance at the various maps of Sobibór. The most “correct” map, 239<br />

drawn by Bill Rutherford in 2002 and partially based on air photos,<br />

shows that the northern, eastern, and western borders of the vaguely<br />

trapezoidal camp III area hardly could have been observed from other<br />

233 “mit Hilfe von Brandbom[b]en, Holz u. Kohle”; Statement by Kurt Ticho (Thomas),<br />

ROD, c[23.62]09, p. 4.<br />

234 M. Novitch, op. cit. (note 39), p. 78.<br />

235 Cf. Alan Gunn, Essential Forensic Biology, 2nd ed., Wiley-Blackwell, New York 2009,<br />

p. 23.<br />

236 Elizabeth Neuffer, The key to my neighbor’s house. Seeking justice in Bosnia and Rwanda,<br />

Picador, New York 2002, p. 215.<br />

237 “U.N. Starts Digging Up Mass Grave in Bosnia,” The New York Times, 10 July 1996, p.<br />

6.<br />

238 Linda L. Klepinger, Fundamentals of forensic anthropology, John Wiley & Sons, Hobo-<br />

ken (NJ) 2006, p. 119.<br />

239 Online: www.deathcamps.org/sobibor/pic/bmap21.jpg

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!