14.02.2013 Views

SOBIBÓR - Holocaust Handbooks

SOBIBÓR - Holocaust Handbooks

SOBIBÓR - Holocaust Handbooks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

J. GRAF, T. KUES, C. MATTOGNO, <strong>SOBIBÓR</strong> 287<br />

In the preceding chapter we have noted that the Sobibór camp could<br />

not have lacked an delousing facility with baths, if only to protect the<br />

health of the German and Ukrainian personnel. Such a sanitary installation,<br />

however, is not found on any map drawn by former detainees or<br />

SS men. It was probably located in the hut labeled Object E by Kola, in<br />

which toilet articles were found. 871<br />

Jan Piwonski relates that an SS man addressed the crowd at the<br />

camp stating that “now you have arrived at Sobibór, this is a transit station;<br />

so now, you are going to pass through a series of high pressure sanitary<br />

systems, you will then be directed to areas where you will set<br />

yourselves up permanently and work,” 872 which reminds us of an installation<br />

for the production of steam used for disinfection and/or disinfestation.<br />

In any case, it is a known fact that real showers and disinfestation<br />

facilities were claimed by <strong>Holocaust</strong> propaganda immediately after the<br />

war to have been merely fictitious installations designed to fool the victims.<br />

It is hard to believe that Richard David Breitman would write as<br />

late as 1991: 873<br />

“At Majdanek, Globocnik’s realm, a large quantity of installations<br />

have been saved from destruction. The building which housed<br />

the gas chambers still exists – with its outside inscription Entrance<br />

to baths, and one can see the showers and pipes which were not put<br />

in to supply water but to fool the victims.”<br />

If a famous historian could have gone as far as that, what can we expect<br />

from ordinary deportees?<br />

A similar account of the function of Sobibór was given by Judith<br />

Eliazer in her testimony at Rotterdam on 5 February 1946, in which she<br />

said: 874<br />

“On 10 March 1943 we went directly from Westerbork to Sobibór,<br />

where we arrived on 13 or 15 March. There we were selected.<br />

Thirty girls and 44 men were taken out. The remainder were gassed<br />

and burned. (We have seen that the others were moved away in tilting<br />

trolleys. They may have been dumped into pits.) Sobibór was not<br />

a camp. It was a transit camp.” (Emph. added)<br />

871<br />

Cf. chapter 5.4.2.5., p. 157.<br />

872<br />

Emph. added. J. Piwonski, op. cit. (note 221).<br />

873<br />

R.D. Breitman, Himmler. Il burocrate dello sterminio, Mondadori, Milano 1991, p. 318.<br />

874<br />

ROD [Rijksinstituut voor Oorlogsdocumentatie, Amsterdam], 200AR-Z251/59 0V, p.<br />

904.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!