14.02.2013 Views

SOBIBÓR - Holocaust Handbooks

SOBIBÓR - Holocaust Handbooks

SOBIBÓR - Holocaust Handbooks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

280 J. GRAF, T. KUES, C. MATTOGNO, <strong>SOBIBÓR</strong><br />

correspond to the elusive Führerbefehl, the only reasonable conclusion<br />

which mainstream historiography could draw from the transfer of a portion<br />

of the T4 staff to the Aktion Reinhardt camps would be the extension<br />

of the euthanasia program to the Jews who were to be moved to the<br />

East. 850<br />

In such a case, however, the deportees in the camps would not all<br />

have been assassinated (except for a handful selected for work), but only<br />

a small fraction of them. One could thus no longer speak of pure extermination<br />

camps. Be��ec, Sobibór, and Treblinka would thus have had<br />

a double function: a principal function as a transit camp for the resettlement<br />

to the East, and a secondary function as a euthanasia center for<br />

the mentally ill or the incurably sick.<br />

This conclusion would also explain the double chain of command<br />

applying to those camps:<br />

Führer chancellery � Wirth: for euthanasia<br />

Himmler � Globocnik: for the deportation.<br />

It would also be in agreement with the (low) quantitative material<br />

findings at Be��ec and Sobibór (mass graves and ash) which cannot be<br />

integrated in any way into the thesis of extermination.<br />

The official thesis discussed above contains, moreover, a fundamental<br />

incongruity. The reasoning of the verdict for the Sobibór trial<br />

states: 851<br />

“This command had the task of helping the sick and the disabled<br />

as well as the children which were not accompanying the women on<br />

the normal path to extermination to climb into vehicles. German<br />

guards, in an effort to make them or keep them unsuspicious as to<br />

the killing plan, explained to these arrivals that they would be taken<br />

to the camp ‘sick-bay.’ They were taken to the stretch of woods east<br />

of camp III and were then shot and interred by members of the Ger-<br />

850 According to mainstream <strong>Holocaust</strong> historiography, the Poles were subjected to euthanasia<br />

from autumn of 1939 onwards, but on a very limited scale (a few thousand persons).<br />

Stanis�aw Batavia, “Zag�ada chorych psychicznie,” in: Biuletyn G�ównej Komisji Badania<br />

Zbrodni Niemieckich w Polsce, III, Pozna� 1947, pp. 91-106; Willi Dressen, op. cit.<br />

(note 762), pp. 62-65. However, the case of the 25,000-30,000 Poles suffering from incurable<br />

tuberculosis in the Warthegau raises doubts on this point. On 1 st May 1942 (NO-<br />

246) Gauleiter Greiser proposed to Himmler to kill them, but on 18 November this problem<br />

was still being discussed (NO-249), and in the end these patients were not killed.<br />

(“The Medical Case,” op. cit. (note 828), pp. 759-794, “Project To Kill Tubercular Polish<br />

Nationals”), although it would have been easy to send them to Che�mno.<br />

851 A. Rückerl (ed.), op. cit. (note 36), p. 168.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!