14.02.2013 Views

SOBIBÓR - Holocaust Handbooks

SOBIBÓR - Holocaust Handbooks

SOBIBÓR - Holocaust Handbooks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

26 J. GRAF, T. KUES, C. MATTOGNO, <strong>SOBIBÓR</strong><br />

unnoticed. We will discuss the Pechersky report in chapter 4.2. in more<br />

detail.<br />

2.3.4. Adam Rutkowski (1968)<br />

It took 23 years after the end of the war for anything to be published<br />

about Sobibór by a historian. Although it was not a book, at least it was<br />

a 40-page article. Its author was Adam Rutkowski, a staff member of<br />

the Jewish Historical Institute in Warsaw. The title can be translated as<br />

“The resistance movement in the Hitlerian execution camp of Sobibór.”<br />

27 Rutkowski’s article exhibits most clearly certain fundamental<br />

contradictions and absurdities which reappear throughout the later literature<br />

about the camp. We will now discuss two of them.<br />

2.3.4.1. The knowledge of the “working Jews” about the fate of the<br />

other deportees<br />

Rutkowski writes:<br />

“Initially not even those detainees who had been in Sobibór for<br />

some time knew what Sobibór really was due to the internal structure<br />

and organization of the camp (the complete isolation of the individual<br />

camp sections, especially of section 3 where the gas chambers<br />

stood).” (p. 5)<br />

A few pages further on, we read:<br />

“The ‘old’ detainees who wanted to spare the new arrivals any<br />

overly violent discoveries did not tell them the whole truth about Sobibór,<br />

especially about section 3, hermetically closed-off, but introduced<br />

them only slowly, in a stepwise fashion, to what Sobibór<br />

was.” (p. 10)<br />

In contrast to this we have Rutkowski’s description of the arrival of<br />

new transports:<br />

“We must stress that the deportees, after having travelled for a<br />

long time (e.g. from Holland), were immediately made part of the efficient<br />

machinery of annihilation; this machinery would herd the victims<br />

from the first into the second barbed-wire cage, accompanied<br />

by deafening shouts on part of the SS men as well as by shooting,<br />

and would finally chase them into the gas chambers.” (p. 4)<br />

Other authors report that the SS received the new arrivals in a soothing<br />

manner, with an SS man giving a deceptive speech describing So-<br />

27 Adam Rutkowski, “Ruch Oporu w Hitlerwoskim Obozie Strace� Sobibór,” in: Biuletyn<br />

�ydowskiego Instytutu Historycznego, No. 65-66, Warsaw 1968.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!