14.02.2013 Views

SOBIBÓR - Holocaust Handbooks

SOBIBÓR - Holocaust Handbooks

SOBIBÓR - Holocaust Handbooks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

J. GRAF, T. KUES, C. MATTOGNO, <strong>SOBIBÓR</strong> 219<br />

8. The Führerbefehl and the Origins of the<br />

“Extermination Camps” in the East<br />

8.1. The Führerbefehl and <strong>Holocaust</strong> Historiography<br />

During the Nuremberg trial, at the morning hearing of 15 April<br />

1946, the former commander of the Auschwitz camp, Rudolf Höß, declared<br />

that, in the summer of 1941, he was ordered, by Reichsführer SS<br />

Heinrich Himmler to come to Berlin and that Himmler told him on that<br />

occasion that Hitler had given the order to exterminate the Jews. 633 This<br />

Führerbefehl immediately became the cornerstone of mainstream <strong>Holocaust</strong><br />

historiography then taking shape but still lacking any kind of documentation.<br />

Over the following decades these historians went on to<br />

build upon this meager foundation a fortress of assertions and hypotheses<br />

so full of internal inconsistencies that in the late seventies David<br />

Irving would go so far as to question whether Hitler was even aware of<br />

the alleged genocide. 634 The ensuing debate of these theses, moved<br />

along by Martin Broszat, then director of the Munich Institut für Zeitgeschichte,<br />

592 generated new points of view which brought with them a<br />

new historiographic concept, known as the functionalist or structuralist<br />

concept. Right from the start and in a way inevitably, this concept was<br />

at odds with the ailing Nuremberg concept – which we may call intentionalist<br />

– because at heart it constituted a critical reaction to the teachings<br />

of this “courtroom-based” historiography, the historiographic failings<br />

of which it exposed all too clearly. Hitler’s role in the alleged genocide<br />

was reassessed along entirely different perspectives, becoming<br />

more and more obscure in the process and finally ending up in a “nod”<br />

by Hitler or in a “meeting of minds.”<br />

Mainstream <strong>Holocaust</strong> historians dedicated two major meetings to<br />

these burning problems.<br />

The first of them was an international congress on the topic “Nazi<br />

Germany and the extermination of the Jews,” organized by the Ecole<br />

633 IMT, vol. XI, p. 398.<br />

634 D. Irving, Hitler’s War. Wiking Press, New York, 1977.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!