14.02.2013 Views

SOBIBÓR - Holocaust Handbooks

SOBIBÓR - Holocaust Handbooks

SOBIBÓR - Holocaust Handbooks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

J. GRAF, T. KUES, C. MATTOGNO, <strong>SOBIBÓR</strong> 183<br />

We have already said that J. Schelvis believes some 170,000 Jews<br />

were deported to Sobibór, but his figure is probably too high by about<br />

10,000 and should be reduced accordingly. 521 Hence, the conclusion of<br />

the Hagen court regarding the number of deportees (150,000) was absolutely<br />

realistic. At the same time, their dogmatic conviction that the deportees<br />

were all murdered immediately on arrival (except for laborers<br />

directly employed at Sobibór or a small number that were sent to work<br />

camps) is clearly apparent. The judges never even thought that the documentary<br />

evidence cried out for different interpretations.<br />

Listed below are the names of the persons convicted, together with<br />

their respective sentence and offense:<br />

� Karl Frenzel: Life imprisonment for aiding and abetting with others<br />

the murder of at least 150,000 persons and for the murder of nine<br />

persons;<br />

� Franz Wolf: Eight years imprisonment for aiding and abetting with<br />

others the murder of at least 39,000 persons;<br />

� Alfred Ittner: Four years imprisonment for aiding and abetting with<br />

others the murder of at least 68,000 persons;<br />

� Werner Dubois: Three years imprisonment for aiding and abetting<br />

with others the murder of at least 15,000 persons;<br />

� Erwin Lambert: Three years imprisonment for aiding and abetting<br />

with others the murder of at least 57,000 persons;<br />

� Erich Fuchs: Four years imprisonment for aiding and abetting with<br />

others the murder of at least 79,000 persons. 521<br />

Except in the case of Frenzel, these sentences were surprisingly<br />

mild. This can be explained by the general reasoning valid for all trials<br />

of personnel having worked in the “extermination camps”: The judges<br />

assumed that the defendants had not volunteered for serving in these<br />

camps and that a refusal to participate in the maintenance of the “machinery<br />

of murder” could have exposed them to sanctions, including the<br />

death penalty. Thus, the court did not a priori attribute to them base<br />

motives – a condition which was and still is necessary in Germany for a<br />

murder charge. Base motives only came into play if a defendant had<br />

committed unrequested crimes, for example killing or ill-treating Jewish<br />

laborers, or whipping Jews on their way to the gas chamber. In such<br />

cases of “excesses,” the defendants could face the toughest sanctions.<br />

521 Cf. chapter 2.3.19.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!