14.02.2013 Views

SOBIBÓR - Holocaust Handbooks

SOBIBÓR - Holocaust Handbooks

SOBIBÓR - Holocaust Handbooks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

176 J. GRAF, T. KUES, C. MATTOGNO, <strong>SOBIBÓR</strong><br />

provided under oath by the witnesses L. and R., former Sobibór detainees.<br />

Both of them have identified the defendant as having been<br />

the man who was acting as Gasmeister in the Sobibór camp.”<br />

Sensing the extremely hostile position of the court, Erich Bauer apparently<br />

did not deem advisable to deny the alleged mass murders at<br />

Sobibór, as he feared that such a stand would be regarded as “persistent<br />

disavowal” and held against him. He thus limited himself to “deny the<br />

atrocities and inhuman acts with few exceptions.” In later years, countless<br />

defendants in NS trial would adopt the same strategy.<br />

The man ‘Toni’ identified by Bauer as having been the Gasmeister<br />

was most probably the SS man Anton Getzinger, who did guard duty at<br />

camp III and was killed in late summer or fall of 1943 while trying to<br />

defuse a Soviet tank grenade, which exploded in his hands. 505 As the<br />

court could no longer indict Getzinger, Bauer apparently decided to<br />

blacken a dead man by nominating him Gasmeister posthumously. It<br />

did not help him in any way, though.<br />

As we have already stated, Bauer’s lawyer wanted to have Gomerski<br />

and Klier – awaiting trial in their Frankfurt jail at the time – testify on<br />

his client’s behalf. The court, however, refused to hear them, not only<br />

because of the impending emigration of the witnesses Lerer and Raab,<br />

but also because it a priori held them to be untrustworthy: 506<br />

“The witnesses G. and K. are SS men who were leaders of the<br />

Sobibór camp at the same time as the defendant; both of them have<br />

been indicted for having committed crimes against humanity in the<br />

Sobibór camp and are presently held awaiting trial or were formerly<br />

so held at the time of their provisional interrogation by the Frankfurt<br />

local court […] and this court thus did not hesitate in deciding<br />

that it had to accept the depositions of witnesses L. and R. rather<br />

than the untrue depositions of witnesses G. and K.”<br />

This means the court believed that witnesses for the prosecution<br />

were, by definition, always telling the truth whereas former SS men<br />

were, by the same token, always lying – except, of course, in those cases<br />

where they testified against themselves or against their former comrades.<br />

The Berlin court was of the opinion that “hundreds of thousands of<br />

Jews” had been gassed at Sobibór. 507 The judges accepted as “proof” of<br />

505 J. Schelvis, op. cit. (note 71), p. 255.<br />

506 LG Berlin, op. cit. (note 277), p. 6.<br />

507 Ibid., p. 10.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!