14.02.2013 Views

SOBIBÓR - Holocaust Handbooks

SOBIBÓR - Holocaust Handbooks

SOBIBÓR - Holocaust Handbooks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

174 J. GRAF, T. KUES, C. MATTOGNO, <strong>SOBIBÓR</strong><br />

which, as we have already mentioned, is based exclusively on Esther<br />

Raab’s statements. 498<br />

“One day before his departure [to America], Samuel suddenly<br />

burst into Esther’s apartment, his face flushed with excitement. ‘Esther,<br />

come quick! It’s him!’[ 499 …] Since Samuel was scheduled to<br />

leave Germany the next day, he followed the police to the station<br />

and gave them a brief statement about the crimes committed by SS<br />

Oberscharführer Erich Bauer in Sobibór.’[ 495 …] ‘Samuel’s testimony<br />

stretched into the late afternoon, and it was already early evening<br />

when he finally left the station. He ran home to finish packing his belongings,<br />

and the next day he left the country as planned. Now, Esther<br />

remained the only person to witness against the notorious Bademeister.”<br />

The wording of the sentence against Erich Bauer squarely contradicts<br />

this account. When Bauer’s lawyer asked to have the two witnesses<br />

“L.” and “R.” (Lerer and Raab) confront the two former SS men<br />

“G.” (Hubert Gomerski) and “K.” (Johann Klier), the court struck down<br />

the request, saying i.a.: 500<br />

“An adjournment of the proceedings would also disallow another<br />

objective of the defense, i.e. a confrontation of these witnesses with<br />

the witnesses L. and R., because the latter have announced that they<br />

are about to emigrate; thus a new main hearing would have to take<br />

place without them.”<br />

Hence, Samuel Lerer, at the time of the trial, had not yet emigrated<br />

at all and was still in Berlin, continuing to be a witness for the prosecution<br />

against Bauer. The arrest of the latter had incidentally taken place<br />

in 1949, 501 which means that several months had passed between Bauer’s<br />

identification by Lerer and the trial. It is inconceivable that Esther<br />

Raab could have forgotten these circumstances and Lerer’s participation<br />

in the trial, which means that she lied to Shaindy Perl on purpose. The<br />

only motive for this would be egocentricity: Esther Raab apparently<br />

wanted to be the only person to have tracked down Bauer all by herself<br />

and without any help from Lerer.<br />

498 S. Perl, op. cit. (note 62), p. 222.<br />

499 S. Perl, op. cit. (note 62), p. 219.<br />

500 LG Berlin, op. cit. (note 277), p. 7.<br />

501 http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sobibor-Prozess. J. Schelvis confirms on p. 236 that Bauer’s<br />

arrest took place in 1949. On p. 247, though, he asserts that Bauer was arrested as early<br />

as 1946 (op. cit. (note 71)). We assume that the former date, and not the latter, is in accordance<br />

with the facts.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!