14.02.2013 Views

SOBIBÓR - Holocaust Handbooks

SOBIBÓR - Holocaust Handbooks

SOBIBÓR - Holocaust Handbooks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

J. GRAF, T. KUES, C. MATTOGNO, <strong>SOBIBÓR</strong> 139<br />

tial average of 69.4 kg to 52.6 kg at the end of the period. On average<br />

they lost 16.8 kg or 24.4%, split up in the following manner: 411<br />

� Water: 37% of total loss or 6.2 kg<br />

� Proteins: 9% of total loss or 1.5 kg<br />

� Fat: 54% of total loss or 9.1 kg<br />

As we have seen above, the heat loss brought about by the loss of<br />

1.5 kg of proteins is the equivalent of the heat necessary to evaporate<br />

(1.5×5.5=) 8.2 kg of water, whereas the 9.1 kg of fat lost would have<br />

evaporated (9.1×9.6=) 86.3 kg of water, for a total of 94.5 kg of water.<br />

Since body water dropped by only 6.2 kg during the emaciation<br />

process, the negative effect of the loss of fat and proteins is enormous,<br />

corresponding as it does to the heat of vaporization of (94.5 – 6.2 =)<br />

88.3 kg of water.<br />

In other words, the loss of 6.2 kg of body water saves some<br />

6.2×(640+0.493×700) � 6,100 kcal in terms of fuel requirements, as<br />

opposed to a loss of available fuel of (9.1×9,500+1.5×5,400) � 94,500<br />

kcal caused by the loss of body fat and proteins. This results in a negative<br />

balance of some 88,400 kcal, the equivalent of 23 kg of dry wood.<br />

In conclusion it may be said that, even though the average weight of<br />

the deportees may actually have been lower 412 than the values computed<br />

above, this would not have brought about any benefit as far as the thermal<br />

balance is concerned; on the contrary, it would have constituted a<br />

disadvantage, as it would have raised the fuel requirements.<br />

5.3.6. Factors Influencing the Cremation<br />

Available information on the burning of carcasses tells us that there<br />

are two factors favoring the combustion: the fat content of the carcasses<br />

and the dryness of the wood:<br />

“A very important factor observed during the incineration<br />

process was that carcass body fat added significantly to the incineration<br />

rate. It was observed that the small carcasses weighing less<br />

than 100 pounds [45 kg] were not incinerated as quickly as the carcasses<br />

with increased body fat. The body fat appeared to increase<br />

the incineration rate and provide higher burn temperatures.” 413<br />

411 Flamini Fidanza, “Effects of starvation on body composition,”<br />

www.ajcn.org/cgi/reprint/33/7/1562.pdf<br />

412 But T. Blatt writes: “There was no end to the quest for efficiency: it was found that the<br />

pyres burned hotter if fat women were alternated with the wood.” T. Blatt, op. cit. (note<br />

17), p. 18.<br />

413 “Swine carcass disposal evaluation using Air Curtain Incinerator System, Model T-359,”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!